Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they

Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.

Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and 'adroit' a little-known concept.
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they
Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they

When Stephen Kinzer observed, “Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they try to imagine how global politics will unfold. In the foreign policy business, however, inertia is a powerful force and ‘adroit’ a little-known concept,” he laid bare the struggle between vision and stagnation. To be adroit is to be skillful, flexible, alive to shifting winds. Yet in the halls of foreign policy, where pride and bureaucracy reign, men often cling to the past, blinded to the new horizons that demand fresh thought.

The ancients knew well this danger. In war and in diplomacy, those who adapted thrived, while those bound to old ways perished. When Hannibal crossed the Alps with elephants, Rome nearly fell, for its leaders could not imagine war waged in such a fashion. It was only when Rome itself learned to be adroit, reshaping its strategies, that it survived. Kinzer reminds us that the same truth holds in global politics—those who fail to adapt are doomed to be overtaken by the tides of history.

Yet, as he laments, the natural state of institutions is inertia. Bureaucracies move slowly, leaders prefer the comfort of the familiar, and nations cling to outdated doctrines long after the world has shifted beneath them. It is easier to repeat the strategies of yesterday than to embrace the perilous work of reimagining tomorrow. In this way, power ossifies, and opportunities for peace, for progress, or for survival itself slip away.

History gives us sobering examples. In the years before World War I, the great powers clung to alliances, military doctrines, and rivalries that no longer served the realities of their age. Their inertia carried them blindly into catastrophe, where millions perished. In contrast, leaders like Franklin D. Roosevelt, facing World War II, practiced the very adroitness Kinzer praises—reshaping alliances, rethinking policies, and embracing innovation to meet unprecedented threats.

Thus, let this lesson be passed down: the world is never still. To lead with wisdom is to see the new realities as they are, not as one wishes them to be. Beware the seductions of inertia, for it is a silent tyrant that binds nations in chains of habit. Honor instead the path of the adroit, for in their skill and flexibility lies the power to guide humanity through storms, to seize opportunities, and to avert ruin. This is the eternal law: only those who adapt endure.

Stephen Kinzer
Stephen Kinzer

American - Author Born: August 4, 1951

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment Adroit geo-strategists take new realities into account as they

KDTran Khanh Duy

I’m struck by Kinzer’s comment about 'adroit' geo-strategists and how the concept seems underutilized in foreign policy. Given how quickly the world is changing, shouldn't the decision-makers be more nimble in their thinking? Why is there such resistance to innovation? Does the inertia in foreign policy mean that countries are more reactive than proactive? How can global powers find a way to move past this resistance to change?

Reply.
Information sender

GDGold D.dragon

Stephen Kinzer’s take on inertia in foreign policy is quite thought-provoking. It makes me wonder if the hesitation to adapt to new realities is more about political risk than a lack of strategy. Could it be that leaders fear the consequences of breaking away from established norms? How can global politics evolve if there’s such a reluctance to embrace new thinking and change? Is this a system built for stability or stagnation?

Reply.
Information sender

MNTran Huyen My Nguyen

This quote brings up an important point: while the world is constantly changing, foreign policy seems stuck in old patterns. If adroit geo-strategists are trying to break away from this inertia, how do they even begin? What would it take for them to convince governments to embrace new strategies? How much of foreign policy is dictated by tradition versus adapting to the present and future realities of global dynamics?

Reply.
Information sender

CC.U.T.M.U.I

Kinzer’s perspective on inertia in the foreign policy world resonates with the frustration many people feel about slow-moving change in global politics. How much of this inertia comes from the influence of powerful countries or longstanding alliances? If geo-strategists are aware of the shifting realities, why is it so difficult to break out of these patterns? Can we ever expect meaningful reform in foreign policy, or is the status quo too powerful to overcome?

Reply.
Information sender

THthu HUYEN

Stephen Kinzer’s comment about the inertia in foreign policy is eye-opening. It seems like global politics is often slow to adapt, even when new realities emerge. Why is that? Is it because of entrenched interests or a reluctance to embrace change? It makes me think about how foreign policy can sometimes be reactive rather than proactive. Can we ever truly expect innovation and flexibility in such a deeply entrenched system?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender