All sorts of computer errors are now turning up. You'd be

Host: The night was a cathedral of screens. Rows of monitors flickered like stained glass windows of the new religion — the church of data.
In the quiet hum of a late-shift research lab, the air vibrated with the whir of servers, the faint scent of coffee gone cold, and the soft pulse of machines that never slept.

Beyond the glass, rain drizzled against the neon skyline, turning each drop into a shard of light. Inside, Jack leaned over a keyboard, his face lit by the sterile blue glow of the monitor — eyes sharp, tired, unblinking.
Across the desk, Jeeny sat cross-legged on a swivel chair, a paper cup in her hand, her long black hair spilling forward as she watched him with a kind of weary amusement.

On one of the monitors, a news ticker scrolled by: Hospital AI reports 42 cases of male pregnancy — software glitch under investigation.

Jeeny smirked.
And the conversation began.

Jeeny: “Isaac Asimov once said, ‘All sorts of computer errors are now turning up. You’d be surprised to know the number of doctors who claim they are treating pregnant men.’”

Jack: (chuckling) “Asimov — the prophet of irony. He saw this mess coming before we even built it.”

Jeeny: “You say mess, I say evolution. Errors are just the growing pains of progress.”

Jack: “That’s the problem. We’ve started calling mistakes ‘progress.’ Machines misread reality, and instead of fixing them, we adjust our definitions.”

Jeeny: (teasingly) “You sound jealous, Jack. Maybe it’s hard watching algorithms make decisions faster than you ever could.”

Jack: “Faster, yes. Better, no. A machine can’t blush, can’t hesitate, can’t wonder if it’s wrong. Humanity’s only saving grace was doubt — and we’ve outsourced that too.”

Host: The lights flickered faintly, the servers humming like a distant choir. The rain outside grew heavier, blurring the glass — a veil between man and machine, between certainty and chaos.

Jeeny: “So you think Asimov was mocking us?”

Jack: “He was warning us. When doctors start believing data over bodies, something fundamental dies — the part of medicine that still requires touch.”

Jeeny: “But data is the new anatomy, Jack. You can scan a body, predict disease, simulate organs — all before a human hand even intervenes. That’s not death; that’s precision.”

Jack: “Precision without intuition is just calculation. You can’t quantify suffering, Jeeny. You can’t code empathy.”

Jeeny: “You can simulate it. Maybe that’s enough.”

Host: The blue light from the monitors bathed them both — Jack’s face carved in angles of resistance, Jeeny’s eyes soft, reflecting pixels like constellations. Between them, a cup of untouched coffee steamed faintly — a small, human rebellion against perfection.

Jack: “Simulated empathy. That’s the saddest phrase I’ve heard this week.”

Jeeny: “You underestimate imitation. Half of what we call compassion is learned performance anyway. Machines are just better at consistency.”

Jack: “Consistency isn’t morality. It’s programming. A machine can’t choose kindness — it just executes it. That’s not virtue. That’s obedience.”

Jeeny: “And humans? We fail at kindness all the time, but call it complexity.”

Jack: “Because it is complexity. Real compassion hurts. It costs something.”

Host: A single beep sounded from the monitor — a soft, mechanical heartbeat. The screen displayed a row of error codes, red and insistent.
Jack’s fingers flew across the keyboard. Jeeny watched — not anxious, just curious — the way a philosopher watches an argument unravel.

Jeeny: “You know what’s funny? Those doctors Asimov talked about — the ones treating pregnant men? They probably blamed the system, not themselves. Just like you.”

Jack: “Blame’s not the point. Accountability is. Machines make errors, but humans let them pass because the screen said so.”

Jeeny: “And yet, we designed those screens. Every mistake is a mirror.”

Jack: “Maybe that’s why it hurts. We built perfection, and it keeps reflecting our flaws.”

Host: The rain outside softened, and the world seemed to lean in — as if listening. A neon sign across the street flickered: TRUST THE SYSTEM. The irony hung in the air like perfume — sharp, artificial, intoxicating.

Jeeny: “Do you ever think Asimov’s quote was more about human arrogance than machine failure?”

Jack: “It’s about both. We create systems smarter than ourselves, then act shocked when they start to outgrow our morality.”

Jeeny: “Outgrow, or reveal?”

Jack: “Reveal what?”

Jeeny: “That our morality was never as logical as we pretended. Machines make errors, yes — but they don’t lie. Only humans do that.”

Jack: (quietly) “Maybe lying is the last human freedom.”

Host: The server lights blinked in synchronized rhythm, little green eyes winking in approval — or warning. Jack leaned back, rubbing his temples. Jeeny’s voice softened, taking on a quiet intensity, like someone addressing the future.

Jeeny: “You know, I think Asimov laughed when he wrote that line. Not because he feared machines, but because he knew humans would still be the weakest link. We can invent intelligence, but we can’t teach it conscience.”

Jack: “Or humility.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. The computer says a man is pregnant, and instead of questioning the data, the doctor doubts the man. That’s not technology’s fault — that’s faith misplaced.”

Jack: “Faith in the wrong god.”

Jeeny: (smiling faintly) “Data is just the new deity. Cold, absolute, and worshipped through screens.”

Jack: “And we — the new priests — too proud to admit the gospel has glitches.”

Host: The clock on the wall ticked with surgical precision, each second cutting deeper into their silence. The room pulsed with the faint hum of current — a rhythm like breath, like thought.

Jeeny: “You ever wonder if one day machines will look back on this era the way we look back on alchemy? Primitive faith dressed as science.”

Jack: “If they do, I hope they remember we meant well.”

Jeeny: “Meaning well is the oldest human error.”

Jack: “And the most beautiful one.”

Host: A sudden buzz filled the room — the monitor clearing the last of its errors. The message blinked: System restored. No anomalies detected.
But both of them knew better. The real anomalies weren’t in the circuits. They were in the species that built them.

Jeeny: (whispering) “Maybe that’s what Asimov was really saying — that technology won’t destroy us. It’ll just hold a mirror up until we can’t stand the reflection.”

Jack: “And by then, we’ll call that reflection intelligence.”

Jeeny: “Or god.”

Host: The rain stopped. The city lights burned steady now, their glow casting long reflections across the wet glass — the illusion of movement, of life still learning itself.
Jack turned off the monitor. For a moment, the darkness felt alive — not empty, but aware.

Jack: “Maybe errors aren’t the problem, Jeeny. Maybe they’re the proof we’re still human.”

Jeeny: “Then may the machines never stop making them.”

Host: The camera lingered on their silhouettes — two minds framed by the pale glow of technology’s quiet hum.
Outside, the sky began to clear, and a thin line of dawn cut through the dark — a sterile, beautiful horizon, where faith and code, error and intention, still tried to coexist.

And as the world blinked awake, Asimov’s laughter seemed to echo somewhere in the circuitry — soft, knowing, infinite — reminding them both that in the pursuit of perfection,
the most dangerous malfunction is still the human heart.