An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the

An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the

22/09/2025
12/10/2025

An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.

An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the
An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the

John J. Sirica, the judge who dared to challenge the shadowed corridors of power, once declared: “An attempt is already underway to revise history — to leave the impression that the former president had nothing to do with Watergate. But there is no doubt about his obstruction of justice after the Watergate break-in.” These words, heavy as stone and bright as lightning, are not merely an observation of his time; they are a warning to all ages. They echo across centuries to remind mankind that truth is a fragile monument, easily defaced by those who seek to rewrite it for comfort, for power, or for pride.

The meaning of this quote lies in the eternal struggle between truth and revision, between those who remember honestly and those who distort conveniently. Judge Sirica, who presided over the trials that unveiled the dark secrets of the Watergate scandal, saw firsthand how men of influence sought to cloak their sins beneath the silk of deception. His voice, stern and righteous, rose against the tide of falsehood, proclaiming that history must not be cleansed by the guilty. For to erase the past is to wound the future, to strip coming generations of the wisdom born from truth.

To understand the origin of these words, we must return to the early 1970s, when America’s faith in its leaders was tested as never before. The Watergate scandal began with a break-in — a small act of political espionage — but it grew into a revelation of corruption, lies, and abuse of power that reached the highest office in the land. When the evidence emerged, Judge Sirica stood not as a mere adjudicator, but as a guardian of integrity, refusing to let the truth be buried under the rubble of political convenience. His quote reflects not only his judgment of one man but his defense of the moral order itself — that even kings and presidents must answer to the law.

The ancient world knew this truth well. When Thucydides, the great historian of Greece, wrote of the Peloponnesian War, he warned that men would “receive the lessons of history through the deceitful mirror of words.” He understood that power fears memory, that rulers often attempt to sculpt their own legacies by erasing their errors. Yet Thucydides, like Sirica, believed that only by confronting wrongdoing can a people remain free. When those in authority seek to rewrite history, it is the duty of the brave — historians, judges, and ordinary citizens alike — to guard the truth with vigilance.

Sirica’s words also carry the weight of moral courage. It is not easy to stand against the tide, especially when the tide flows from the halls of power. But truth, once spoken with conviction, becomes a light that cannot be hidden. His declaration is both an accusation and a command: that no one, not even a president, stands above the law; that justice must be preserved even when memory is threatened. This principle, as ancient as Hammurabi and as sacred as Solon’s code, forms the very foundation of civilization — that truth must not bend before might.

Consider, too, the countless times in history when truth was silenced — when empires burned the scrolls that shamed them, when kings erased the names of their rivals from stone, when tyrants rewrote chronicles to glorify themselves. Yet the truth always returns, as a whisper, a fragment, a surviving witness. Just as the papyrus of Egypt and the tablets of Babylon outlasted their rulers, so too did the truth of Watergate endure — because men like Sirica refused to let lies triumph. His words remind us that while time may fade ink, courage preserves meaning.

The lesson, then, is eternal: guard truth as you would guard your soul. When others seek to soften the past or distort the record, do not remain silent. Speak as Sirica spoke — with conviction born not of anger, but of duty. For history is not merely the story of what happened; it is the conscience of humanity. When we permit it to be altered, we lose not only accuracy, but honor. The rewriting of history is the slow death of truth — and truth, once slain, rarely rises again.

Therefore, let his words stand as both a flame and a shield: a flame to burn away deceit, and a shield to protect what is sacred. Remember that truth does not defend itself — it depends on the vigilance of the just, the courage of those who would rather face scorn than accept lies. Be such a guardian. For as long as even one person stands to speak the truth, history cannot be erased, and justice will yet find its voice.

John J. Sirica
John J. Sirica

American - Judge March 19, 1904 - August 14, 1992

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment An attempt is already underway to revise history - to leave the

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender