An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be

An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be

22/09/2025
11/10/2025

An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.

An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be
An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be

In the fiery and immortal words of Susan B. Anthony, the great champion of liberty and equality, we hear the sound of righteous thunder: “An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters of every household... carries discord and rebellion into every home of the nation.” Here speaks not merely a reformer, but a prophetess — a voice echoing through the corridors of time, crying out against a system so insidious that it poisons not only the halls of government, but the hearths of every home. Her words are a call to conscience, a warning that injustice in the public realm breeds tyranny in the private, and that the oppression of women is not merely a wrong against them, but a blight upon the soul of the nation itself.

Susan B. Anthony, born in the 19th century amid the moral tempests of abolition and reform, fought not only against slavery, but against the deeper and older bondage — the subjugation of women. Her quote was born in the aftermath of the Civil War, when the nation debated who should possess the right to vote. Many believed the struggle for freedom was finished once the enslaved were liberated. But Anthony, with the clarity of a seer, saw another chain still clinging — the “oligarchy of sex,” wherein men, even those who spoke of liberty, still ruled over their wives, their mothers, their daughters. She compared this hierarchy of gender to the “oligarchy of race” that had justified slavery, warning that one form of domination could not be defeated while another was preserved. For tyranny, like a weed, grows again wherever the soil of inequality remains unturned.

Her words cut to the core of the family, that sacred unit upon which society rests. By naming “father, brothers, husband, sons” as the rulers over “mother and sisters, wife and daughters,” she revealed the hypocrisy of a nation that proclaimed freedom but practiced servitude in its most intimate spaces. To her, this was not merely social inequality — it was a spiritual disorder. For how could a nation call itself just when half its people were denied the right to think, speak, and act for themselves? When power is concentrated in one sex, she warned, even love becomes corrupted; it transforms from a bond of mutual respect into a chain of obedience. This, she said, “carries discord and rebellion into every home,” for where there is injustice, there can be no peace — not in the nation, nor in the family.

History bears witness to the truth of her words. In ancient Athens, the birthplace of democracy, women were denied citizenship. Men debated philosophy and governance in the agora, while their wives were confined to the shadows of the home. The same Athens that produced Socrates and Pericles also silenced Aspasia, the brilliant woman who shaped their thought but could never claim her voice in public. Thus, even in the cradle of freedom, the oligarchy of sex endured — and it weakened the very civilization that sought to elevate reason and justice. So too, in Anthony’s America, the Republic proclaimed liberty yet bound women in silence. She saw what others refused to see: that no democracy can stand upon a foundation of inequality, for a nation divided against itself — not by geography, but by gender — must eventually crumble.

Anthony’s words were also born from compassion, for she did not see men as enemies, but as captives of their own privilege. The “oligarchs of sex,” she said, are not merely oppressors, but victims of a false power that blinds the heart to love’s true nature. For to rule over one’s mother or sister is to violate the sacred law of kinship; to silence one’s wife is to extinguish the very voice that could teach tenderness and wisdom. In this sense, her warning transcended politics — it was a plea for the redemption of humanity itself, for the restoration of harmony between man and woman, reason and compassion, strength and grace.

The courage of Susan B. Anthony found its fruit in generations that followed — in the suffragists who marched through jeers and violence, in the countless women who rose from silence to speech. Their struggle was not merely for votes, but for the reclamation of dignity. And yet, her warning still rings true in every age, for the oligarchy of sex does not die easily. It survives in subtle hierarchies — in the unseen assumptions that still shape our homes, our workplaces, our laws. The work she began must be continued by every soul who believes that justice is indivisible.

The lesson of her words, therefore, is both ancient and eternal: liberty cannot coexist with domination. Every form of inequality — whether of race, class, or sex — is a shadow that darkens the whole world. To build a just society, we must begin at the hearth — in our own homes, our own hearts — where love must be partnership, not rule. Let fathers teach their sons that strength is not command, but compassion; let mothers teach their daughters that obedience is not virtue, but silence before tyranny. And let every home become a small republic of mutual respect, where no one reigns and no one bows.

Thus, in the spirit of Susan B. Anthony, we must carry forward the eternal flame of equality — for when the fire of justice burns in the household, it will illuminate the nation. The oligarchy of sex, like that of race, can be defeated only by truth: the truth that every soul, regardless of body or birth, is sovereign, sacred, and free. And when that truth is honored — not just in law, but in love — then at last, the “discord and rebellion” will cease, and humanity will live in harmony with its own divine design.

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment An oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender