Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as

Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.

Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics.
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as
Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as

Listen well, O children of the future, for the words of Liz Kendall hold a truth that strikes at the very heart of integrity and authenticity: "Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as you grow up you're wondering, 'What is that going to mean if I ever end up being a politician?' You wouldn't have anybody except ruthlessly ambitious automatons going into politics." These words speak of a world where the quest for power consumes the very soul of individuals, shaping them into machines of ambition, devoid of the genuine qualities that make a leader truly great. Kendall warns against a society where political ambitions overshadow personal growth and authenticity, leading to a generation of leaders who have lost their humanity.

In the ancient world, the great philosophers often spoke of the danger of allowing one’s ambition to overtake the true purpose of life. Socrates taught that true virtue lay in self-examination, in living a life of honesty, and in service to others. If one lived solely with an eye toward political success, with every action weighed by its potential to advance one’s own ambition, that person would become hollow, disconnected from the genuine needs of the people. The wise man, Socrates taught, does not seek power for power’s sake, but seeks to live a virtuous life and serve the common good. Kendall's words echo this ancient truth—if politics becomes a game played only for personal gain, it loses its noble purpose.

Consider the story of Cincinnatus, the Roman general who was called from his plow to serve as a dictator during a time of crisis. When the crisis was resolved, he did not cling to power, nor did he seek to build his own political legacy. Instead, he willingly returned to his farm, rejecting the allure of permanent authority. Cincinnatus’s actions exemplify the ideal that politics should be about service, not ambition. He was a leader who understood that true greatness lies not in accumulating power, but in knowing when to step aside for the greater good. In contrast, if one were to constantly measure their actions by their potential political gain, they would risk becoming a mere tool of ambition, like the automatons Kendall speaks of.

Similarly, the rise of Julius Caesar provides a stark contrast. Caesar’s relentless pursuit of power and his ability to manipulate both the political and military spheres led him to become the dictator of Rome. Though his accomplishments are numerous, his ambition ultimately led to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Caesar became consumed by his desire to rule, and in doing so, he transformed from a leader into a tyrant. His story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition, a lesson that resonates with Kendall's warning that if political ambition becomes the primary focus of one’s life, the world would be left with soulless leaders, driven only by the desire for power.

So, my children, remember Kendall's wisdom: if we allow ambition to rule our hearts, if we measure every action by how it might propel us toward political power, we risk losing the very qualities that make us human. True leadership lies not in the quest for personal gain, but in service, in humility, and in the desire to make the world a better place for others. Let your lives be shaped not by political games, but by the values that endure beyond the machinery of politics—honor, integrity, and a genuine desire to contribute to the common good. Only in this way can you avoid becoming the automatons of ambition and instead become leaders who are truly worthy of the trust placed in them by the people.

Liz Kendall
Liz Kendall

British - Politician Born: June 11, 1971

With the author

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment Can you imagine if it was like that: everything you're doing as

LHLynh Ha

I’d love a comparative angle. In places with stronger privacy norms or the right to be forgotten, does the candidate pool look more diverse and less stage-managed? Conversely, strong transparency laws protect the public but can turn into voyeurism. Where’s the workable middle: shield minor, non-criminal youth behavior; fully disclose patterns of harm, corruption, or hypocrisy? What institutional actors—election commissions, parties, press councils—should set those boundaries, and how do we prevent them from becoming self-serving gatekeepers?

Reply.
Information sender

TPAnh Thu Pham

Practical question for would-be public servants: how do you address past mistakes without feeding a feeding frenzy? Is it wiser to preempt with a “history memo” (what happened, who was affected, what you did to repair), or wait until asked? What’s a credible apology template—acknowledge impact, no excuses, show concrete restitution, explain the guardrails you now use? I also worry about class bias: wealthy candidates can scrub or lawyer up. What equity measures keep honesty from becoming a disadvantage?

Reply.
Information sender

MTMinh Thao

If the only viable candidates are those who optimized their lives for optics at 14, representation skews toward carefully curated personalities. That pushes out people with textured experiences—care work, dead ends, recoveries. How do we structure recruitment and selection so evidence of growth counts more than sterile perfection? I’m thinking open primaries, small-donor financing, and debate formats that reward admitting change. Could parties explicitly value documented learning and restitution over spotless timelines? What criteria would operationalize that?

Reply.
Information sender

QNbui vo quoc ngu

Media incentives seem to supercharge the problem—oppo dumps, outrage cycles, and algorithmic amplification reward the most scandalous framing. Is there any appetite for newsroom standards that discount trivial, old, or contextless youthful behavior? Would you support a kind of “statute of limitations for trivial missteps,” or editorial labels that distinguish pattern from one-off? Yes or no: should platforms add context prompts on viral pile-ons involving decade-old posts? I’m trying to imagine reforms that reward proportion over spectacle.

Reply.
Information sender

TTNguyen Thuy Trinh

This makes me think about the chilling effect of total-life surveillance on future leaders. If every adolescent mistake becomes a permanent exhibit, do we discourage normal experimentation and growth? I’m curious what norms or rules could protect a “right to evolve” without excusing harm. Should we draw a bright line around juvenile years, or time-limit minor embarrassments from dominating vetting? I’d love a perspective on balancing accountability with grace so we cultivate reflective adults rather than airbrushed résumés.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender