Christlike communications are expressions of affection and not
Christlike communications are expressions of affection and not anger, truth and not fabrication, compassion and not contention, respect and not ridicule, counsel and not criticism, correction and not condemnation. They are spoken with clarity and not with confusion. They may be tender or they may be tough, but they must always be tempered.
Host: The city lay in a hushed twilight, its streets slick with rain, reflecting neon and moonlight alike. Inside a dim café tucked between bookstores and alleyways, a faint melody of an old piano wandered through the air. The windows were fogged, the air smelled of coffee and memory, and two voices began to rise from a corner booth.
Jack sat with his coat still damp, his hands wrapped around a mug like he needed its warmth to keep his thoughts from freezing. Jeeny sat across, her eyes tender but resolute, a small notebook resting beside her untouched tea.
Host: There was a tension between them, soft yet deliberate — the kind that fills the silence when two people love truth but not the same version of it.
Jeeny: “Do you know this quote, Jack? L. Lionel Kendrick once said, ‘Christlike communications are expressions of affection and not anger, truth and not fabrication, compassion and not contention…’”
Jack: smirks slightly “I’ve heard of it. Sounds… idealistic. Like something people put on church walls but forget once they start talking.”
Jeeny: “You think people can’t speak like that — with affection and truth?”
Jack: “Not in the real world, Jeeny. Out there, people fight to be heard. Affection doesn’t win elections. Truth doesn’t sell products. Compassion doesn’t get you the promotion. Contention does.”
Host: His voice was low, steady, but a certain weariness trembled beneath the cynicism. Jeeny looked at him — not with pity, but with that quiet courage of someone who still believes despite every reason not to.
Jeeny: “And yet, the world is starving for kindness, Jack. You call it idealism — I call it survival. Affection, truth, compassion, respect… those aren’t luxuries. They’re oxygen for the soul.”
Jack: “Oxygen? No, they’re decorations. We hang them on words when we want to feel moral. But try being affectionate to someone who lies to you. Try being compassionate to someone who mocks you. See where it gets you.”
Host: The piano faltered into silence. The rain outside intensified, slapping against the windowpane like unspoken anger.
Jeeny: “You think affection means weakness?”
Jack: “I think affection means pretending the other person deserves it.”
Jeeny: “Then you’ve mistaken affection for approval. Christlike affection isn’t blind. It’s strong enough to face the truth without hatred.”
Host: Jack’s eyes flickered. A small, almost invisible crack ran through his guarded expression.
Jack: “Strong enough? No one’s that strong, Jeeny. Look at history. Every time people tried to build something on love — it collapsed. Gandhi preached peace and got a bullet. Martin Luther King Jr. preached compassion and was murdered for it. Even Christ, the man your quote speaks of — crucified for speaking kindly. So tell me — where’s the strength in that?”
Jeeny: “You see their deaths, Jack. I see their courage. They were condemned, yes — but they changed hearts. You think compassion failed? It moved nations. Anger might start revolutions, but only love rebuilds after them.”
Host: A light flickered above them, humming softly. The shadows shifted across Jack’s face — half in darkness, half in the dim amber glow.
Jack: “So what, Jeeny? You’re saying if everyone just speaks tenderly, the world heals itself?”
Jeeny: “Not tenderly — truthfully. Tenderness without truth is sentimentality. But truth without tenderness is cruelty. Kendrick’s words mean that how we speak can be as holy as what we speak.”
Jack: “Holy words don’t feed the hungry or stop wars.”
Jeeny: “Neither does cynicism.”
Host: Her voice sliced through the air, soft but firm. Jack’s jaw tightened; he looked away, his reflection distorted in the rain-streaked glass.
Jack: “You talk like it’s that simple. Like words are enough.”
Jeeny: “Words are the beginning, Jack. Every act of hate started with one angry word. Every act of healing started with one honest one.”
Jack: “So you believe that if we all just ‘speak like Christ,’ the world will turn into paradise?”
Jeeny: “No. But I believe it might stop becoming hell.”
Host: For a moment, the noise of the rain softened, as though the world paused to listen. Jack let out a slow breath, the kind that carries years of disappointment.
Jack: “You’ve never worked in politics, have you? Or corporate boardrooms? Or places where truth is a liability and affection is laughed at? You can’t survive out there by being Christlike.”
Jeeny: “Then maybe the point isn’t to survive, but to redeem what’s left of our humanity while we do.”
Host: The clock ticked faintly. Jeeny’s eyes glistened — not with tears, but with a certain luminous defiance.
Jeeny: “You know what I think? Anger feels powerful because it’s easy. Affection feels weak because it’s difficult. That’s why few people dare to use it.”
Jack: “And yet anger gets results.”
Jeeny: “So does a scalpel. But you don’t heal a wound by cutting deeper.”
Host: A silence fell again — thick, contemplative. The rain had begun to slow, its rhythm softening like a lullaby.
Jack: “You talk about compassion as if it’s always right. But what about tough love? What about telling someone the truth they don’t want to hear?”
Jeeny: “That’s part of compassion. Kendrick said — they may be tender or tough, but they must always be tempered. It’s not about softness; it’s about control. Christlike communication isn’t silence in the face of evil — it’s the courage to confront, without losing respect.”
Jack: “So, correction without condemnation?”
Jeeny: “Exactly.”
Host: Jack’s eyes softened — just slightly — like a cloud thinning to let in a sliver of light.
Jack: “You make it sound possible. But what about when people twist your kindness? When they take your truth and call it weakness?”
Jeeny: “Then you keep speaking. Because the goal isn’t to win the argument — it’s to keep your soul intact.”
Jack: “And if you lose everything in the process?”
Jeeny: “Then you’ve lost nothing that mattered.”
Host: The café door opened briefly, letting in a gust of cold air and the faint scent of street smoke. Jack turned his head, watching a stranger pass by, shoulders hunched against the storm. Something in that image — the loneliness, the endurance — seemed to reach him.
Jack: “Maybe you’re right. Maybe we’ve confused strength with noise. We shout because we’re afraid no one’s listening.”
Jeeny: “And we listen less because everyone’s shouting.”
Host: A brief smile flickered between them — fragile, but real.
Jack: “So… what does Christlike communication look like between two flawed people, Jeeny?”
Jeeny: “It looks like this — disagreement without hatred. Truth without humiliation. Correction without contempt. It’s the art of speaking as if every word could either break or build someone’s spirit.”
Jack: “And you think that can change the world?”
Jeeny: “No. But it can change a moment. And that’s where the world begins.”
Host: The rain had stopped. The streets shimmered with the last drops of reflected light, and the music returned — faint, distant, like the echo of forgiveness. Jack leaned back, his eyes calmer now, the edge in his voice dissolving into quiet reflection.
Jack: “Maybe affection doesn’t win arguments… but maybe it wins peace.”
Jeeny: “Exactly. Peace isn’t the absence of conflict — it’s the presence of understanding.”
Host: The camera would linger there — two souls, still divided yet somehow closer, framed by the gentle glow of a streetlamp outside. The steam from their cups drifted upward, intertwining like breath meeting breath, warmth meeting warmth.
Host: In that small, flickering moment, between truth and tenderness, between reason and faith, the world — or at least this little corner of it — felt almost Christlike.
AAdministratorAdministrator
Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon