During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts

During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.

During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts
During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts

The words of Ben Shapiro — “During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts only once: after the election of Richard Nixon, during the Vietnam War. The result: Vietnam fell to the Communists, the Russians moved into Afghanistan, and American influence around the globe waned dramatically.” — are a reflection on the peril of weakness in an age of struggle between empires. They speak not merely of armies and weapons, but of the balance of power, the invisible scale on which nations weigh one another. In the long twilight of the Cold War, where neither side dared to strike openly, power was measured in readiness, in strength held in reserve. Shapiro warns that when that strength falters, the rivals of freedom grow bold.

To speak of military cuts is to speak of retreat. When Nixon, weary of the Vietnam quagmire, reduced America’s might, it was not only a drawing down of forces — it was a signal to the world. To allies, it whispered uncertainty; to adversaries, it beckoned opportunity. The fall of Vietnam was not merely the collapse of a government, but the triumph of communist ideology in Southeast Asia. The jungles of Indochina became the grave of American influence, and the world, watching, saw that even the mighty could stumble.

From this stumble, new doors opened for America’s enemies. The Soviet Union, sensing weakness, moved with confidence into Afghanistan in 1979. Their armies marched into the mountains, seeking to extend their dominion and test whether America, humbled in Vietnam, had the will to oppose them. This chain of events is what Shapiro calls our attention to: that weakness in one arena breeds boldness in another, that when one wall of defense crumbles, the floodwaters pour through many gates.

History offers us other examples of this truth. When Rome withdrew legions from its distant provinces to ease its burdens, the tribes beyond the frontiers surged forward. What was meant as economy became calamity, for strength once surrendered is not easily regained, and enemies are quick to seize the moment. So too in the Cold War, where perception was as powerful as weapons themselves. A cut in military might was not only a fact, but a message — and the world read it clearly.

The deeper meaning of Shapiro’s words is this: power abhors a vacuum. When the guardians of freedom lay down their arms, others take them up. When vigilance is abandoned, the ambitious advance. The Cold War was not won by battles alone, but by the unrelenting demonstration that America would not yield. The one time it appeared to falter, adversaries rushed forward, and the world grew darker. In this truth lies the eternal lesson: peace is often preserved not by withdrawal, but by the steady presence of strength.

Yet this wisdom must be tempered with compassion. To cut armies is not always folly, for the burden of war weighs heavily on the people. But the cost of hasty retreat may be far greater than the cost of endurance. In the case of Vietnam, America sought relief from endless loss, but the result was not peace — it was the emboldening of adversaries and the shrinking of influence across the globe. The lesson is harsh, but necessary: the price of leadership in the world is vigilance that does not easily rest.

What, then, should we learn? In our own lives, just as in nations, we must guard the strength we hold. Do not surrender your defenses — whether they be of character, of principle, or of resolve — for the moment you grow complacent, the adversary, whether external or internal, will advance. Stand firm in discipline, in vigilance, and in readiness, and you will find that strength alone can often prevent the need for conflict.

Thus let Shapiro’s words endure as both warning and counsel: a single act of retreat may echo across the world. In the struggles of nations and the battles of life, strength preserved is peace preserved, while weakness invites the storm. Let us therefore learn to measure the cost not only of war, but of surrender, and to hold fast to the strength that guards our freedom.

Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro

American - Author Born: January 15, 1984

With the author

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment During the Cold War, America undertook serious military cuts

ALAnnh Le

This quote brings up a critical issue in geopolitics: the long-term effects of military cuts on a nation’s global standing. Was the U.S. wrong to reduce military expenditure after the Vietnam War? Looking back, did those cuts lead to a weakened position that allowed other powers to step in, or was it a natural consequence of America’s overextension during the Cold War?

Reply.
Information sender

TNTra Nguyen

Shapiro’s take on the Cold War era makes me wonder: was the military retrenchment after Nixon’s election a strategic misstep, or was it a reflection of the changing global landscape? How often do nations have to reassess their military commitments, and what are the consequences when they do? What if America’s decline in global influence was tied to other factors beyond military cuts?

Reply.
Information sender

HPNguyen Hoang Phuc

It’s interesting to think about how decisions made in the past, like military reductions during the Vietnam War, echo through history. Could a shift in America’s military strategy have altered the outcome in Vietnam, or was the situation too complex to influence solely through military means? This raises questions about how we view military power and its true role in foreign policy.

Reply.
Information sender

LHBao Thuyen Le Huynh

Shapiro’s analysis of America’s military cuts and their long-term consequences seems to paint a clear picture of how strategic decisions can shape history. If the U.S. had maintained its military strength, would Vietnam have remained in the West's sphere of influence? But on the flip side, was the cost of maintaining military power in such a turbulent period just too high for America?

Reply.
Information sender

336.Thinh

This quote makes me reflect on the balance between military spending and global influence. Is it possible that the U.S. was too quick to reduce its military presence, which led to significant geopolitical shifts? Could the world have looked very different if America had maintained its military strength during that period, or was the decline inevitable due to other global factors?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender