Few businessmen are capable of being in politics, they don't
Few businessmen are capable of being in politics, they don't understand the democratic process, they have neither the tolerance or the depth it takes. Democracy isn't a business.
The words of Malcolm Forbes, "Few businessmen are capable of being in politics, they don't understand the democratic process, they have neither the tolerance or the depth it takes. Democracy isn't a business," fall like a solemn warning carved into stone. Here is revealed a truth: the ways of the marketplace and the ways of the republic are not the same path. One is ruled by profit and gain, the other by patience, justice, and the slow weaving of voices into unity. To mistake one for the other is to endanger the very soul of the people.
Consider the ancient tale of Pericles, who led Athens not as a merchant seeking wealth but as a steward of the polis. He understood that democracy demanded more than transactions; it demanded listening, debate, sacrifice, and a spirit that embraced even dissent. Had he ruled as a trader rules a market stall, weighing only coin against coin, Athens would not have flowered into the beacon of philosophy, art, and freedom that it became. His greatness lay not in gain, but in the depth of vision he bore for his people.
Yet history shows also the ruin when rulers treat democracy as though it were a business. The robber barons of the industrial age sought to wield their fortunes in the halls of politics, imagining nations could be run as they ran their empires of steel and oil. But the people are not mere workers on a ledger, nor citizens mere customers to be bought and sold. Where such men held sway, corruption festered, rights withered, and the voice of the many was silenced by the gold of the few.
For the heart of democracy is tolerance, the willingness to endure the long argument, to honor the voice of one’s adversary, and to value the dignity of every soul. This requires a depth that no coin may measure. It is a labor of patience, often without profit, and sometimes without glory. To those who think only in gains and losses, this labor seems folly. But to those who understand the sacred weight of freedom, it is the highest calling.
So let these words be carried forward as a shield for future generations: guard the realm of democracy from those who would turn it into a marketplace. For the republic is not for sale, nor are its people merchandise. It belongs to the many, not the few; to those who listen, not only to those who command. And in this truth lies the strength of nations that endure beyond the passing of empires.
TPThanh Pham
Malcolm Forbes’ statement seems to imply that businessmen, with their focus on efficiency and profit, may not always have the temperament required for democratic governance. But do you think there are aspects of business that could be beneficial in politics, such as strategic thinking and problem-solving? How can we ensure that those entering politics from the business world are prepared for the complexities of governance while maintaining their effectiveness?
LULe Uyen
Forbes suggests that businessmen often struggle with the democratic process because they prioritize results over collaboration and tolerance. This resonates with the idea that business leaders may lack the patience for the messy, consensus-driven nature of politics. Can we blame them for struggling in politics, or should they be expected to adjust to a system that requires more diplomacy and inclusivity? How do we create better paths for such individuals in politics?
TMNguyen Thi May
Malcolm Forbes’ critique of businessmen in politics feels like a reminder that democracy is about public service, not corporate strategy. Businessmen may excel at making decisions that benefit shareholders, but democracy requires broader thinking and the ability to consider diverse perspectives. Do you think this creates a challenge for the government when corporate leaders enter politics, or is it possible for them to adapt to the demands of democratic leadership?
PLphuong long
Forbes' quote raises an important point about the potential disconnect between business leadership and political leadership. While businessmen often prioritize results and control, politics requires collaboration, tolerance, and long-term thinking. Can business leaders successfully transition into politics, or does the nature of the two fields require fundamentally different skills? How can the political system better accommodate individuals with corporate backgrounds?
TCHoang T Chuc
Malcolm Forbes’ statement about businessmen in politics highlights the differences between the corporate world and democratic governance. It’s interesting to think that business-driven approaches may clash with the nuances of democracy, where compromise and public engagement are key. Do you think businessmen’s focus on efficiency and profit can sometimes hinder the democratic process? Can business-minded individuals be successful politicians if they adapt their mindset?