Fortunately, I don't talk about politics on stage.
Hear the words of Mike Birbiglia, a teller of stories, who declared with humble wit: “Fortunately, I don’t talk about politics on stage.” This is not merely a jest, but a reflection of wisdom hard-earned. For the stage is a sacred place where laughter binds strangers into kin, and where burdens are lifted, if only for an hour. To bring politics into that sanctuary risks turning joy into division, and shared humanity into quarrel.
Comedy, like the songs of old bards, has always been a lantern in the dark, guiding weary souls toward light. But when that lantern is clouded by the smoke of politics, its glow falters. Many great jesters of history have learned this truth. In the courts of kings, a fool who mocked policy too deeply could meet the sword, while one who lifted spirits without sowing strife was cherished. Thus, Birbiglia stands in a long tradition of performers who chose connection over contention, healing over hostility.
Consider the tale of Aristophanes, the ancient Greek playwright. In his comedies, he often mocked the politics of Athens. Though his wit was sharp, his words left audiences divided, and his plays were sometimes met with wrath. His boldness was admired, but it also revealed the peril of blending laughter with politics. Birbiglia, unlike Aristophanes, chooses the safer yet profound path: to let humor rise above strife, to offer laughter as a bridge rather than a weapon.
To refrain from politics on stage is not cowardice, but a form of discipline. It is to remember that the role of the comedian is not always to persuade, but to unite. In times when nations fracture and arguments rage, the gift of shared laughter becomes more precious than persuasion. The wisdom lies in knowing that not every battleground must be entered, and not every platform is meant for debate.
Therefore, pass on this lesson: there is power in choosing silence on matters that divide, so that the voice may rise clear in what unites. For the art of comedy is not diminished by avoiding politics—it is made timeless, reaching hearts across ages and beliefs. Birbiglia’s words remind us that sometimes the truest courage is not in speaking every thought, but in guarding the space where joy may freely dwell.
KNKim Ngoc
Mike Birbiglia's stance on not talking politics during his performances is definitely understandable. In an age of constant political debate, comedy can serve as a much-needed break from the noise. But I wonder, do comedians have a role in using their voice for more than just humor? Is it possible to entertain and still spark thoughtful political conversations, or is it better to keep those discussions separate from the stage?
DVTran Dinh Van
I get why Mike Birbiglia says he doesn't talk about politics on stage, but part of me feels like comedy could be a powerful way to address political issues. After all, comedians have a unique ability to make people think about serious matters while still keeping things light. By avoiding politics, though, does Birbiglia miss out on using his platform for social change, or is he just keeping his audience's stress level down in a polarized world?
MTHa Mai Trang
Mike Birbiglia’s comment about not talking about politics on stage made me think. In today’s world, it seems almost impossible to avoid political discussions—everything feels connected to politics. Is it even realistic for a comedian to completely steer clear of politics? Maybe Birbiglia is trying to make his comedy more universal by focusing on relatable, everyday topics. But is there a danger in avoiding political discussions, especially when so many people are feeling the impact of current events?
UGUser Google
I think Mike Birbiglia’s approach to avoid political topics is refreshing. Comedy can be a relief from the stress of the news cycle, but does that mean comedians should avoid these tough subjects? Maybe Birbiglia is trying to keep his audience engaged without stirring controversy. Does that mean comedy should remain neutral, or does avoiding politics keep comedians from addressing important societal issues that their audience might appreciate?
NMNguyen Ngoc Mai
Mike Birbiglia’s decision not to talk about politics on stage makes sense in some ways. Comedy can be a space to help people forget about the world’s problems for a while. But what about comedians who do talk about politics? Does that make their humor more relevant or just divisive? It’s curious how some comedians steer clear of political topics, while others dive right in. What’s the right balance between entertainment and commentary?