Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to

Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to

22/09/2025
03/11/2025

Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.

Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices.
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to
Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to

Host: The factory’s roof moans beneath the weight of the storm. Lightning cuts the sky into shards of silver, each flash revealing the outlines of machines, steel, and loneliness. The city sleeps beyond the fog, but inside this abandoned industrial hall, two silhouettes stand in the half-lightJack, with his coat thrown over his shoulder, and Jeeny, her hair soaked, her eyes burning through the dark like truths that refuse to die.

The air smells of rust and memory.
The rain taps on the metal roof like an old clock, counting the seconds between confession and understanding.

Jeeny: “Do you ever think, Jack, that maybe freedom isn’t about what we choose, but about what we refuse?”

Jack: “You mean that Adorno line you sent me — about not choosing between black and white? I’ve been thinking about it. Sounds poetic, sure. But in the real world, you don’t get to abjure choices. You make one, or someone makes it for you.”

Host: The light from a broken window casts a stripe across Jack’s face, dividing it between shadow and illumination — a literal portrait of his argument.

Jeeny: “That’s exactly it. We’ve been trained to believe that choice equals freedom. But what if every choice they give us is already rigged? Black or white, left or right, rich or poor — all illusions of control inside a machine that already knows how we’ll move.”

Jack: “You sound like a philosopher who’s never had to pay rent. Try standing at a grocery store at midnight deciding between two brands of instant noodles. That’s not a system — that’s survival.”

Jeeny: “No, Jack. That’s exactly the system. It’s how they keep you busy, choosing between trivialities, so you never look up and ask who’s deciding the menu.”

Host: The wind howls through a crack in the roof. A single lightbulb sways, flickering. Their shadows move like ghosts debating in an old theatre, long after the audience has gone.

Jack: “So you’re saying not choosing is freedom? That’s naive. Refuse long enough and the world makes the choice for you. You get left behind.”

Jeeny: “Or you get free. Look at people who walked away from systems — monks, poets, revolutionaries. They didn’t just reject power; they rejected the terms of its game. Think of Thoreau. He left society for a cabin, not to escape it, but to see it from the outside. Isn’t that freedom?”

Jack: “And what did that change? Society kept going. He came back, wrote a book, and the system turned him into a brand of rebellion. That’s how it works, Jeeny. The system eats even its own critics.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe freedom isn’t a result, Jack. Maybe it’s a stance. A refusal to let the system define your language of choice.”

Host: A pause. The rain slows. In the distance, the sound of a train fades into the fog, its horn echoing like an unanswered question. Jeeny steps closer. Jack’s breathing steadies. His eyes, grey and stormlit, meet hers.

Jack: “So what does that mean in practice? Do we stop voting? Stop working? Stop caring?”

Jeeny: “It means we start seeing. Really seeing. How often do you vote between two names that serve the same master? How often do you buy what you think you’ve chosen, when you’ve just picked the more marketed illusion?”

Jack: “We can’t all live outside the system. Someone has to keep the lights on.”

Jeeny: “But we can choose how deeply we participate. Adorno wasn’t telling us to abandon life — he was warning us not to mistake complicity for freedom.”

Host: The lightbulb above them buzzes. A moth circles it, its wings beating against heat it can’t understand. The metaphor hovers — too obvious, too perfect.

Jack: “You know what I think? Freedom is choice. The more choices we have, the more free we feel. Even if they’re imperfect.”

Jeeny: “That’s the trick, Jack. They’ve made you believe multiplicity equals liberation. But even ten thousand choices can still be the same script, just in different fonts.”

Jack: “Then what’s the alternative? To sit still and pretend the game doesn’t exist?”

Jeeny: “To write your own rules. To ask questions they didn’t plan for. To be a third color in a world obsessed with contrast.”

Host: A flash of lightning cuts through the window, and for a second, both their faces are the same — neither in black nor white, but caught in the blur between — where definition fails, and truth begins.

Jack: “You always talk in riddles, Jeeny. But maybe you’re right. Maybe freedom is the moment before the system can label you.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. Once they can label you — liberal, conservative, artist, worker — they can predict you. Control you. But if you stay undefined, you stay dangerous.”

Host: Jack laughs, low and tired, like a man remembering something he’d forgotten — a childhood before the world had categories. He picks up a rusted gear from the floor, turns it in his hand.

Jack: “You ever think maybe we need the system, though? People crave order. They fear grayness — it’s too big, too uncertain. Maybe that’s why we invented gods and governments.”

Jeeny: “Yes. Because chaos frightens us. But what if grayness isn’t chaos? What if it’s truth — the space where opposites meet and speak instead of fight?”

Jack: “Sounds romantic.”

Jeeny: “It’s not romance. It’s evolution.”

Host: The storm outside begins to fade, leaving a thick mist that seeps into the room. The machines, silent and ancient, stand like monuments to an era of certainty. The world they built ran on binaries — on/off, worker/boss, male/female, win/lose. But now, in this ruin, those definitions feel obsolete.

Jack: “So, what do we do, Jeeny? How do we live in grayness without losing ourselves?”

Jeeny: “We learn to listen instead of label. To see shades instead of sides. To exist where meaning is still being made.”

Jack: “You make it sound almost... holy.”

Jeeny: “Maybe it is. Maybe freedom is the most sacred thing because it can’t be owned.”

Host: A moment of stillness. The rain stops completely. The roof drips. Outside, the first hint of dawn bleeds through the fog, soft and colorless, like the world before definition. Jack takes a breath, as if the air has changed.

Jack: “You know, I used to think freedom meant being able to do whatever I want. Now I think it means not needing to prove that I can.”

Jeeny: “That’s it. To live beyond permission. To exist without being told what you are.”

Host: The morning seeps in slowly. Light crawls over the machinery, the walls, their faces. It doesn’t choose a side — it simply touches everything.

Jack and Jeeny stand in it — no longer divided, no longer arguing — just two figures in the gray, finally whole.

Jack: “Maybe that’s what Adorno meant all along. Not black, not white — but the courage to stand where colors fade, and still call it beautiful.”

Jeeny: “Yes, Jack. To abjure prescribed choices is to start painting your own.”

Host: The camera pulls back. The factory becomes a speck in the vast, quiet morning. The sky clears, leaving only the echo of their voices, and the soft, eternal hum of freedom — neither black nor white, but something infinite, unwritten, and alive.

Theodor W. Adorno
Theodor W. Adorno

German - Philosopher September 11, 1903 - August 6, 1969

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender