Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built

Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.

Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built in a way that disadvantages Democrats. Unfair as it may be, voter participation is the one power individuals can wield against those headwinds.
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built
Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built

Jonathan Capehart, speaking with the urgency of a watchman on the walls of democracy, warns that gerrymandering and the structure of the Senate create forces that bend the scales of power. These injustices may be real, and the field of battle may be uneven, yet he declares that the true strength of the people lies still in their voter participation. For though systems may be designed to disadvantage, the collective voice of citizens remains the one weapon that cannot be stolen unless they surrender it themselves.

The ancients knew that when power tilts unfairly, the people’s resolve becomes the deciding factor. In the days of the Roman Republic, when patricians sought to dominate, the plebeians withdrew to the Sacred Mount, refusing to fight in Rome’s wars until their voices were acknowledged. By their unity and persistence, they secured the office of the Tribune, a safeguard for the common people. So too does Capehart remind us that participation—unyielding, determined—is the key to overcoming imbalance.

History gives us a modern echo in the struggle for civil rights. In the American South, unjust laws and intimidation sought to silence Black voters. Yet through courage, marches, and relentless participation, men and women overcame those headwinds. The march from Selma to Montgomery, led by voices like John Lewis and Martin Luther King Jr., demonstrated that even against rigged systems, the ballot—claimed with sacrifice—could transform a nation.

Capehart’s teaching is both sobering and empowering: though unfairness exists, lamentation alone avails nothing. To dwell on injustice without action is to concede defeat. But each act of participation, each ballot cast, is a defiance against forces that would mute the people’s will. Just as one drop of water may seem small, yet millions together carve valleys through stone, so does the collective vote shape the destiny of nations.

Let future generations remember: no system, however bent, can silence a people who refuse to abandon their power. Gerrymandering may twist districts, the Senate may tilt unfairly, but the voice of the citizen, multiplied in unity, is still the surest defense of liberty. To abstain is to surrender; to vote is to fight. And in that fight lies the hope of justice, not only for one party or one age, but for the enduring health of democracy itself.

Jonathan Capehart
Jonathan Capehart

American - Journalist Born: July 2, 1967

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 4 Comment Gerrymandering is a problem, of course, and the Senate is built

CT39. Hoang Cuong Thinh

This quote prompts me to think about the interplay between structural and individual power in democracy. How do obstacles like the Senate design or gerrymandered districts shape political strategy and policy outcomes? I’m curious whether Capehart sees voter participation as a sufficient counterbalance, or if he envisions it as part of a broader toolkit that includes activism, legal challenges, and reform efforts. How might citizens maximize their impact within such constrained systems?

Reply.
Information sender

Mmiphahahaha

Reading this, I wonder about the balance between acknowledging systemic unfairness and encouraging action. Does emphasizing voter participation risk oversimplifying complex structural problems like gerrymandering, or is it a pragmatic way to empower citizens? I’d like to consider how messaging around political participation can maintain hope without downplaying the need for institutional reform. Could civic education and awareness campaigns make a meaningful difference in overcoming these structural headwinds?

Reply.
Information sender

HNHon Nguyen

I find myself questioning the role of civic responsibility in the face of structural disadvantage. Does Capehart imply that individuals bear a moral duty to vote even when the system is stacked against them? How can citizens stay motivated to participate when their efforts feel limited by institutional biases? I’d like to explore strategies to strengthen voter engagement and collective action that might complement individual voting efforts.

Reply.
Information sender

CLNguyen Thi Cam Ly

This statement makes me think about the tension between systemic barriers and individual agency in politics. If gerrymandering and Senate structures disadvantage certain groups, how much can voter participation realistically counteract these obstacles? I’m curious whether increased turnout alone is sufficient to overcome structural inequalities, or if additional reforms, such as redistricting or Senate expansion, are necessary to ensure fair representation and meaningful influence for all voters.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender