I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of

I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of

22/09/2025
03/11/2025

I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.

I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music. There are some interesting, dynamic voices in rap. But I find most of it irresponsible in its overt violence and commercialization of anger. As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that's the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of
I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of

Host: The night was thick with neon haze and the faint hum of the city. A streetlamp flickered outside the diner, painting the cracked sidewalk in strokes of amber and shadow. Inside, the air smelled of fried oil, coffee, and a faint trace of loneliness. A half-broken jukebox played a soft, melancholic jazz riff, a sound that didn’t belong in this hour but somehow made sense.

Jack sat in the corner booth, a black coat draped over his shoulders, grey eyes fixed on the window where the rain blurred the city lights into trembling smears of color. Across from him, Jeeny sat with her hair damp, strands clinging to her cheek, her fingers tracing circles on a cup gone cold. The weight between them was almost visible — the kind that comes before a conversation about art, truth, and guilt.

Jeeny: “I read something by Yusef Komunyakaa today. He said he wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of rap music, but found most of it irresponsible in its violence and commercialization of anger. And then — the part that got me — ‘As artists, we believe we can will action through language. If that’s the case, we have to take responsibility for what we say.’”

Jack: (leans back, voice low, measured) “Ah. Responsibility. The favorite word of people who’ve never had to fight for a microphone.”

Host: His tone was dry, but not cruel. There was a weariness in it, a kind of truth sharpened by years of seeing art tangled with commerce. Jeeny’s eyes lifted, and for a moment, the fluorescent light caught in them like embers refusing to die.

Jeeny: “You think responsibility is a luxury?”

Jack: “It is — for anyone who’s never had their voice dismissed. When you’re at the bottom, anger isn’t a choice. It’s oxygen. And if the only way the world listens is when you scream, then you scream.”

Jeeny: “But what happens when the screaming becomes a product? When pain turns into a brand?”

Host: The rain outside grew stronger, raindrops tapping against the glass like tiny, restless fingers. The diner seemed to shrink, the space between them tightening, like a string drawn to its limit.

Jack: “That’s not on the artist. That’s on the system. The record labels, the media, the market — they take authentic rage and turn it into a commodity. You can’t blame the fire for the way people sell its heat.”

Jeeny: “Maybe not. But you can ask the fire to know what it’s burning. When someone puts violence into words, over and over, it becomes normalized. A 13-year-old kid hears it, sees it glorified — and it becomes part of how they understand power.”

Jack: (leans forward, brows furrowed) “So you want censorship? You want poets and rappers to write like they’re priests? Art isn’t a sermon, Jeeny — it’s a mirror. And sometimes the world is just that ugly.”

Jeeny: “No. I don’t want saints. I want truth with integrity. There’s a difference between showing violence and selling it. Between naming pain and profiting from it.”

Host: A flash of lightning split the sky, the light washing over their faces — Jack’s sharp, almost stone-like, Jeeny’s soft, but fierce with conviction. The thunder rolled like a heartbeat behind their words.

Jack: “You sound like you think words can save people.”

Jeeny: (quietly) “I do.”

Jack: (half-smile, almost bitter) “That’s idealistic.”

Jeeny: “Maybe. But idealism built every civil rights movement, every revolution, every change we still quote in history books. Martin Luther King’s words weren’t songs, but they were music that moved a nation. Don’t tell me language doesn’t change things.”

Host: Her voice carried a quiet ferocity, the kind that came not from youthful belief but from moral fatigue — the insistence that even if the world doesn’t listen, you must still speak honestly.

Jack: “Sure. But King wasn’t selling records. He wasn’t signed to a label that wanted his message wrapped in beats and bling. Today, outrage has a price tag. Every time someone raps about guns, or hate, or dominance, it sells. Because people buy what reflects their own rage. You can’t blame an artist for feeding what’s already there.”

Jeeny: “But if they believe language has power — if they know words can move people — then yes, they must be held accountable for the direction of that movement. You can’t light a torch and then act surprised when someone uses it to burn.”

Host: Jack’s hands clenched, not in anger, but in frustration. A car horn wailed outside, echoing off the wet pavement like a cry from another world. The city seemed to pulse in rhythm with their voices — both part of a larger argument between creation and consequence.

Jack: “You’re talking about moral purity. But art isn’t meant to be safe. It’s meant to make people feel, to make them see. You think Goya painted those wars because he enjoyed the violence? No. He painted it because it was real, because someone had to look.”

Jeeny: “But even Goya didn’t sell his work as entertainment. He made people confront the horror, not consume it. That’s the difference between witnessing and weaponizing.”

Host: Jeeny’s eyes glistened — not from tears, but from that burning empathy that made her both fragile and invincible. Jack looked at her, and for the first time, his expression softened, as if the armor of logic he wore so tightly had cracked just enough for light to slip through.

Jack: (quietly) “So where’s the line, then? Between truth and responsibility? Between expression and exploitation?”

Jeeny: “The line’s inside the artist. Only they can see it. It’s the moment you ask yourself, ‘Am I creating to heal or to sell?’”

Host: The rain eased into a soft drizzle. The diners in the background spoke in low voices, the sizzle of a grill marking the slow return of normality. But in the booth by the window, the air remained charged — the kind of stillness that comes after lightning, when the world holds its breath.

Jack: “You know… I used to write lyrics when I was younger. Angry ones. I thought the more I cursed, the more real I sounded. But all I was doing was echoing the noise. Nothing changed. It just felt good to shout.”

Jeeny: (smiles faintly) “Maybe that’s where every artist begins — in the noise. But the ones who grow start to listen to what’s beneath it.”

Host: The words lingered between them — tender, heavy, and full of the weight of experience. Outside, the neon sign of the diner flickered, the word “OPEN” blinking like a tired heart refusing to stop.

Jack: (nods slowly) “Komunyakaa’s right, then. If we really believe words can move people — then we’re not just writers. We’re engineers of emotion. And engineers should know the consequences of what they build.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. Because if language can start a war, it can also end one. The question is — which do we choose?”

Host: The camera of the mind panned out — the two figures in a diner, the world outside still wet, reflections trembling on the street. The light above their booth hummed softly, a faint halo over their quiet agreement.

And as the night deepened, their voices faded into the hum of the city — two souls speaking the oldest language there is: the one that asks whether what we say can still make the world better.

Yusef Komunyakaa
Yusef Komunyakaa

American - Poet Born: April 29, 1947

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment I originally wanted to embrace the imagery and forthrightness of

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender