I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies

I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies

22/09/2025
04/11/2025

I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.

I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies, to a noticeable extent on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell, and that all our knowledge of mental processes, like feelings or conscious intellectual activities, is based on a knowledge which we cannot tell.
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies
I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies

Host: The afternoon light filtered through the cracked blinds of an abandoned train station café, turning the dust in the air into tiny golden fragments. The clock above the counter had stopped years ago; still, its hands pointed eternally to 4:07 — as if time itself refused to move. A faint hum of trains could be heard in the distance, but here, in this forgotten corner, the world seemed to hold its breath.

Jack sat by the window, his jacket worn, his eyes sharp but distant. He held a notebook, its pages smudged with half-formed ideas. Across from him, Jeeny stirred a cup of black coffee, her fingers trembling slightly, her eyes thoughtful and warm.

Host: The light shifted, cutting their faces in half — one side bright, one side shadowed — as though truth itself was uncertain in this place.

Jeeny: “Michael Polanyi once said something beautiful — ‘All communication relies, to a noticeable extent, on evoking knowledge that we cannot tell.’” (She looked up, her eyes reflecting light.) “It’s haunting, isn’t it? That so much of what we understand can never quite be said.”

Jack: (He smirked, his voice low, measured) “Haunting, or just inconvenient? You’re talking about the unspoken, the intuition we all pretend to have. But if you can’t explain it, how do you know it’s real?”

Host: A train horn echoed, long and hollow. The air trembled. Jack’s words hung in the space between them — sharp as metal, cold as logic.

Jeeny: “You’ve felt love before, haven’t you, Jack? Or grief? Try to explain those. You can’t measure them, but they’re real. That’s what Polanyi meant — that the most important knowledge lives beneath what we can put into words.”

Jack: “I get that emotions are messy. But that doesn’t make them knowledge. Knowledge is what we can verify — what we can demonstrate. Everything else is… sentiment.”

Jeeny: “And yet even your reasoning rests on what you can’t explain. The way your mind makes leaps between facts, or how you know when an argument feels wrong — that’s tacit knowledge. It’s the silent foundation beneath all thought.”

Host: A faint wind pushed through the cracked window, scattering a few old papers onto the floor. The sound of their flutter filled the silence like a heartbeat — fragile, persistent.

Jack: (Leaning back, lighting a cigarette) “So you’re saying all our clever theories, all our science, rest on something unprovable?”

Jeeny: “Yes. And Polanyi wasn’t denying science — he was humanizing it. Think of how Newton described gravity. He knew how it behaved, but he admitted he didn’t know what it was. Or how musicians play — their fingers know more than their words ever could.”

Jack: (Exhales smoke, eyes narrowing) “That’s muscle memory, not mystery.”

Jeeny: “But where does it come from? Why do some people feel their way through complexity better than others? It’s not data — it’s lived understanding. It’s the kind of knowing that hides behind silence.”

Host: The light dimmed, clouds covering the sun, the station growing darker, more intimate. The faint click of rain began on the roof. The atmosphere thickened, as though the unspoken itself was settling into the room.

Jack: “Alright, say you’re right. We ‘know’ things we can’t say. But that’s useless to communication. If we can’t express it, it’s as if it doesn’t exist.”

Jeeny: “But that’s where communication begins — in trying. Every word is an approximation, a gesture toward something deeper. We never tell the whole truth — we evoke it. Like when you look at someone, and they just… understand.”

Host: Jack paused. The smoke from his cigarette drifted upward, curling like a question without an answer. His eyes flicked toward Jeeny’s — steady, unreadable — but something in them softened.

Jack: “So what — we’re all poets now? Wandering around, speaking in half-truths and hoping someone feels the rest?”

Jeeny: (Smiling faintly) “Maybe that’s what makes us human. We can’t fully tell what we mean — and yet we try. That’s the beauty of it. Every conversation is two souls reaching across the limits of language.”

Jack: (Quietly) “You sound like you believe words are alive.”

Jeeny: “Aren’t they? They breathe when we use them. They carry memories, pain, history. When someone says ‘home,’ it means something different to each of us. Words open doors — but they never show the whole room.”

Host: The rain grew heavier, its sound rhythmic, almost musical. The windowpane fogged, and Jeeny traced a small circle in the condensation. Jack’s gaze followed the motion, his expression unreadable.

Jack: “So communication’s a kind of illusion, then. A trick we play to pretend we understand each other.”

Jeeny: “Not a trick — a miracle. Because even though it’s imperfect, somehow it still works. Even your sarcasm carries truth. Even silence speaks.”

Jack: “Silence speaks?” (He laughed, though softly this time.) “You mean when people stop talking, that’s communication?”

Jeeny: “Sometimes it’s the only honest kind. Think of when you sit by someone grieving — you say nothing, but they know you’re with them. That’s knowledge beyond words. The kind Polanyi meant.”

Host: A pause, deep and delicate. The rain slowed to a whisper, as if listening. A light flickered above them, throwing soft shadows on the table where two cups sat — one empty, one untouched.

Jack: “So maybe we live most of our lives between what can be said and what can only be felt.”

Jeeny: (Nodding slowly) “Exactly. And that’s where meaning hides. Between words. Between looks. Between thoughts we can’t quite name.”

Host: The train station moaned softly as a gust of wind rolled through, carrying the scent of rust and rain-soaked steel. Jack looked out the window, his reflection blurred and ghostly, as though watching a man he didn’t fully know.

Jack: “You know, I used to think communication was about clarity — saying things right. Now I’m wondering if it’s more about courage — daring to say what can never be said perfectly.”

Jeeny: “Yes. To speak despite the limits. To share knowing that most of it will be misunderstood — but to trust that something true will still get through.”

Host: Jeeny’s voice trembled as she spoke, not from fear but from the weight of sincerity. Jack said nothing, only nodded — a slow, unspoken assent.

Host: The rain stopped. Outside, the sky cleared into a pale, washed gold. The station clock, though long broken, seemed almost alive in the fading light.

Jack: (Softly) “Maybe Polanyi was right. Maybe everything we know, everything we feel — all of it rests on what we can’t explain. Maybe words are just the shadow of something larger.”

Jeeny: “And maybe the shadow is the proof that something deeper is there.”

Host: They sat in silence — not empty, but full. Full of shared awareness, unspoken truths, quiet understanding. The light warmed, touching their faces like a benediction.

Host: Outside, the train began to move, its wheels humming low, as if echoing their thought. The sound grew and faded — a reminder that even without words, motion, presence, and silence still spoke.

Host: And so, in that moment, between the said and the unsaid, between what could be known and what could only be felt, the world itself seemed to whisper Polanyi’s truth —

Host: “That all communication, at its heart, is the art of revealing the invisible — of knowing what we cannot tell.”

Michael Polanyi
Michael Polanyi

Hungarian - Scientist March 11, 1891 - February 22, 1976

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment I shall suggest, on the contrary, that all communication relies

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender