I would like to see real peace and a state of Israel living
I would like to see real peace and a state of Israel living peacefully alongside a state of Palestine.
“I would like to see real peace and a state of Israel living peacefully alongside a state of Palestine.” These words, spoken by Elie Wiesel, survivor of the abyss and witness to the darkest night of the human soul, carry not only hope but also the weight of centuries. For he, who walked through the shadows of the Holocaust, knew what it meant for nations to be torn apart by hatred, and for peoples to be denied their right to live with dignity. His cry for real peace is not the shallow quiet that comes from fear or silence, but the deep, life-giving peace that springs from justice, recognition, and coexistence.
The ancients knew well the value of such peace. They told of kingdoms ruined not by the might of enemies alone, but by the festering poison of division. True peace cannot be forced by the sword, nor can it be born from domination. It requires that both peoples—neighbors bound by fate and soil—acknowledge one another’s humanity. This is what Wiesel longed to see: two states, Israel and Palestine, not in endless conflict, but standing side by side like twin olive trees, their roots entangled in the same earth, their branches rising toward the same heavens.
History offers both warnings and glimmers of this vision. Think of the Camp David Accords of 1978, when Egypt and Israel, after years of bitter war, sat across the table and chose dialogue over destruction. Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin, guided by the steady hand of Jimmy Carter, signed a peace that endures to this day. What was once unthinkable became reality, proving that reconciliation, though difficult, is not beyond human reach. If two long-warring nations could break bread and forge peace, then the hope for Israel and Palestine remains, though the path be steep.
Wiesel’s words, however, are not naïve. He spoke of real peace, for there is also a false peace, the kind born of silence imposed upon the oppressed, or the calm that precedes another storm. Real peace does not ignore injustice, nor does it deny the pain of history. It looks directly at wounds and says: these must be healed, not hidden. To live peacefully is not merely to end bloodshed, but to recognize dignity, to honor memory, to build a future where children on both sides wake to laughter rather than fear.
The lesson for us, then, is this: peace is not a gift handed down by rulers, nor is it simply the absence of war. It is a labor, a covenant between peoples, nourished daily by acts of understanding, compassion, and restraint. Just as Wiesel bore witness so that humanity might not forget the horrors of hate, so too must we bear witness to the pain of others, refusing to look away, refusing to dehumanize. For in every age, the seeds of conflict are sown by forgetting that the other is also human.
Practical wisdom flows from this truth: listen before you judge, seek to understand before you condemn, and never harden your heart to the suffering of another. Build bridges in your own life—with your neighbor, with the stranger, with those you are tempted to see as “other.” For if peace cannot be practiced in the small circles of our lives, it cannot flourish in the great arenas of nations. Let each person, then, be a seed of peace, sowing understanding where mistrust reigns.
So let Wiesel’s vision be carried forward, like a torch through the ages: that Israel and Palestine, long bound in pain, may one day live as neighbors, each sovereign, each free, yet joined by the shared destiny of the land they inhabit. And let his voice remind us all that real peace is not a dream too lofty, but a labor too sacred to abandon. For though the path is long, though the wounds are deep, peace remains the highest calling of humanity, and the truest measure of our wisdom.
LLoan
Elie Wiesel’s quote about peace between Israel and Palestine brings to mind a difficult question: What does true peace look like in a conflict so entrenched in history and ideology? Can peace truly be achieved without addressing the deep-seated inequalities and fears on both sides? Is this vision of peaceful coexistence something achievable, or is it an idealistic hope that will always remain just out of reach?
TNThuong Nguyen
Wiesel’s call for peace between Israel and Palestine made me think about the broader concept of coexistence. Is it possible for two groups with conflicting visions of history, land, and sovereignty to truly live side by side without compromising their core identities? What kind of compromises would each side need to make to achieve lasting peace, and are both sides ready for that kind of change?
TDNguyen Tien Duc
Elie Wiesel’s hope for peace between Israel and Palestine is inspiring, but how realistic is it when both sides have such opposing narratives and claims? Could peace ever be achieved if the history of violence and trauma isn’t fully addressed? At what point do both nations have to move beyond their pasts and truly forgive each other, or is reconciliation even possible in such a deeply divided situation?
KVAnh Khuat Viet
Wiesel’s quote speaks to an ideal future, but I wonder about the practicality of achieving peace. What does 'living peacefully' mean in the context of Israel and Palestine? Is it just an absence of war, or does it involve a deeper understanding and respect for each other’s cultures, rights, and histories? Can this kind of peace be attained without compromising the core values of each side?
TNnguyen thi to nga
Elie Wiesel’s vision of peace between Israel and Palestine is a hopeful one, but it feels almost too idealistic given the historical and political complexities. Is it really possible for these two nations to coexist peacefully after decades of conflict? What would it take, both on the leadership and grassroots levels, to make this vision a reality? How do we address the deep-rooted fears and grievances on both sides?