If I became a philosopher, if I have so keenly sought this fame
If I became a philosopher, if I have so keenly sought this fame for which I'm still waiting, it's all been to seduce women basically.
Hear the startling confession of Jean-Paul Sartre, the philosopher of freedom and absurdity, who once declared with mischievous candor: “If I became a philosopher, if I have so keenly sought this fame for which I’m still waiting, it’s all been to seduce women basically.” At first these words may seem playful, even scandalous, as though they belong to the tavern more than to the lecture hall. Yet in them lies a deeper truth: the recognition that much of human striving, however exalted in appearance, springs from the soil of desire. Sartre, with irony, unveils the hidden flame that drives men not only to seek knowledge, but to cloak themselves in brilliance, so that they might be admired, desired, and remembered.
The origin of this saying lies in Sartre’s own life, a man who lived restlessly in the cafés of Paris, smoking, debating, and weaving thoughts that shook the 20th century. Though he clothed his philosophy in the grave garments of existentialism, he did not disguise the raw impulses of the flesh that stirred beneath. He admitted, as the ancients often did, that the pursuit of wisdom is never purely detached—it is entangled with ego, with longing, with the hunger to be seen. In this confession, he speaks not only for himself, but for countless thinkers, poets, and artists whose lofty creations were born also from a yearning for love, admiration, or even conquest.
Consider, for example, the tale of Lord Byron, the poet who set Europe aflame with his verses. His words soared with the grandeur of the eternal, yet his life was driven by desire, his fame intertwined with his pursuit of countless women. Was his poetry diminished by this mingling of longing and artistry? Perhaps not. For beauty and desire have ever been companions, shaping both the poet’s muse and the philosopher’s search. In Sartre’s jest lies the echo of Byron’s truth: even greatness may be born from the passions of the flesh.
Yet let us not mistake Sartre’s words for mere cynicism. There is also here a mirror held before humanity: that much of what we call noble may be rooted in the simple hunger to be loved. This does not shame the work, but humanizes it. For what is philosophy without the human heart beating behind it? What is truth if it is not embodied in longing creatures of flesh and blood? Sartre strips away pretense, reminding us that the pursuit of glory is often a pursuit of intimacy, and that the robe of wisdom may also be a garment woven to attract the eyes of others.
But this confession also carries a warning. For if the pursuit of fame is driven only by the desire to seduce, it may become shallow, unworthy of its higher calling. Desire may spark the fire, but without discipline and depth, the flame consumes rather than illuminates. The ancients knew this: Socrates courted wisdom itself, not women, and through that devotion won disciples whose souls he awakened. The lesson is that one may begin with earthly longing, but must rise toward a greater purpose, lest the philosopher’s crown become a hollow ornament of vanity.
The lesson for us is clear: know your motives, and be honest with them. If ambition springs from desire, admit it, but do not let it remain there. Transform it into something higher. Let the longing to be admired push you first toward achievement, but then toward truth, justice, and wisdom. Do not despise the passions that drive you, for they are part of your humanity. Instead, refine them, as iron is forged into steel, so that what begins in weakness may end in strength.
Practically, this means reflecting on your own pursuits. Ask yourself: why do I seek success? Why do I hunger for recognition? Is it only for applause, for beauty, for the fleeting caress of admiration? If so, take courage, for you are human. But then, go further—let that hunger become the seed of discipline, of creation, of service. Build not only to be admired, but to contribute. Seek not only to be desired, but to be remembered for the depth of your truth and the integrity of your life.
Thus, when Sartre quips, “it’s all been to seduce women basically,” let us hear both the jest and the wisdom. It is a reminder that beneath our lofty endeavors lies the pulse of desire, and that this pulse can either enslave or ennoble us. The path of the wise is to take even the most earthly longing and, without denying it, transform it into something eternal. For in this way, even weakness becomes the seed of greatness, and desire becomes the beginning of wisdom.
TANguyen Hai Thien An
This quote brings up an interesting contradiction between the intellectual pursuit of philosophy and the deeply personal motivations behind it. Sartre’s acknowledgment of seduction as a driving factor opens up a discussion about the intersection of personal desires and intellectual ambitions. Does acknowledging such motivations make his philosophy less credible, or does it humanize him, making his work more relatable?
ATTran Anh Thu
Sartre’s quote gives an interesting glimpse into the personal motivations behind intellectual achievement. Is it possible that many philosophers and intellectuals, though they may claim to seek knowledge for its own sake, are also driven by more human and personal reasons, like desire or recognition? Does this diminish their intellectual work, or is it a natural part of being human?
BTLE bao thy
Sartre’s comment makes me think about the role of personal desire in shaping one's career or intellectual pursuits. It’s interesting to consider whether intellectualism, or fame for that matter, is often intertwined with human desires that aren't necessarily ‘pure’ or academic. Can we separate ambition from personal relationships, or do they often feed into each other in unexpected ways?
HPDo Nguyen Hoang Phuc
Jean-Paul Sartre's statement is quite provocative and playful, revealing a vulnerability that makes him seem almost self-deprecating. Is this a sincere admission of his motivations, or a tongue-in-cheek reflection on the often absurd reasons behind intellectual pursuits? How much of our professional or creative lives are driven by desires that go beyond the surface, even if they aren’t always acknowledged openly?