If poetry should address itself to the same needs and

If poetry should address itself to the same needs and

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.

If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and
If poetry should address itself to the same needs and

Hear, O seekers of wisdom and wonder, the voice of Wallace Stevens, who proclaimed: “If poetry should address itself to the same needs and aspirations, the same hopes and fears, to which the Bible addresses itself, it might rival it in distribution.” These words are not spoken lightly, but with the weight of one who understood the power of words to move nations and shape civilizations. Stevens, that modern prophet of imagination, suggests that poetry, when it dares to speak to the deepest human longings, could carry the same universality as scripture itself.

For what is the Bible, if not a vast library of human struggle and divine encounter? It speaks to hunger and thirst, to exile and homecoming, to guilt and forgiveness, to life and death. It is read not because it is old, but because it speaks eternally to the hopes and fears of the human soul. Its distribution has circled the earth not through clever marketing, but because its words touch the places where humanity is most vulnerable and most exalted. Stevens, in his boldness, imagines a poetry that could do the same.

Consider that in ancient times, Homer’s epics were more than entertainment; they were sacred repositories of meaning for the Greek people. In his verses they found courage, grief, longing, and fate. For centuries, they served as scripture of a kind, guiding identity and culture. Likewise, the Vedas in India or the Tao Te Ching in China were poetic works that transcended literature, speaking to the fundamental rhythm of existence. Thus, history itself confirms Stevens’s insight: poetry, when aligned with the elemental needs of the human soul, becomes scripture.

But he also implies a critique: that much of modern poetry has withdrawn into obscurity, content to speak only to itself or to the learned few, rather than to the multitude. If it fails to address the raw needs of the human heart, then it cannot rival scripture in scope. For people do not hunger after cleverness; they hunger after meaning. They do not thirst for riddles; they thirst for hope. The poet, therefore, must decide whether to remain in the tower of self or to descend into the marketplace of humanity, bearing words that heal, uplift, and reveal.

We see this truth in the life of Langston Hughes, whose poetry reached beyond bookshelves into the lives of ordinary men and women. He wrote not for scholars but for the people, giving voice to the sorrows and aspirations of African Americans. His words were read and recited because they addressed real fears and genuine hopes. In them, people found themselves mirrored and dignified. Hughes’s poetry traveled widely, not unlike scripture, because it fulfilled a spiritual and emotional hunger.

Thus, Stevens points toward a possibility: that poetry, by embracing universality, might again walk hand in hand with sacred texts in guiding humanity. Imagine a verse that speaks to a widow’s grief, a prisoner’s despair, a child’s wonder, a lover’s devotion, a worker’s fatigue. Imagine a poetry that consoles as the Psalms, that questions as Job, that inspires as the Gospels. Such poetry would not be confined to classrooms but would live in the mouths of millions, passed from heart to heart like bread in times of famine.

Therefore, O children of tomorrow, the lesson is clear: if you are a poet, write not only for yourself but for the world. Let your words be rooted in the shared needs, hopes, and fears of humanity. And if you are a reader, seek poetry that speaks beyond ornament, that awakens the soul and gives strength for living. For Stevens has shown us that poetry can aspire to more than beauty—it can aspire to universality, to distribution, to becoming the shared language of the human heart.

So remember: poetry, when it speaks to what the Bible has always spoken to—the eternal questions of life, death, love, faith, despair, and hope—ceases to be mere art and becomes sustenance. It becomes light for the weary, song for the broken, fire for the cold. This is the destiny of great poetry: to rival scripture in its reach, because it dares to touch the eternal in every soul.

Wallace Stevens
Wallace Stevens

American - Poet October 2, 1879 - August 2, 1955

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment If poetry should address itself to the same needs and

TSTommy Shelby

This quote fascinates me because it frames poetry as a kind of secular scripture—a mirror of human experience rather than divine revelation. It makes me ask: what would poetry look like if it truly aimed to guide souls, not just impress minds? Perhaps Stevens is reminding us that the power of words doesn’t depend on doctrine, but on empathy and the courage to speak to what hurts and hopes inside us.

Reply.
Information sender

THDu Thanh Huyen

I think Stevens is touching on the idea that poetry once played a moral or emotional role in human culture, similar to religion. It gave voice to fear, longing, and awe. Maybe that’s why people once memorized and shared poems like prayers. Today, we treat poetry as an art form, not a source of wisdom. I wonder what would happen if that changed again.

Reply.
Information sender

TBDong thi bac

Stevens’s comparison between poetry and the Bible feels provocative, even a little rebellious. He seems to be asking whether poetry could become a new scripture for the modern age—a source of meaning when religion fades. I like that idea, but I also question whether poetry can bear that weight. Unlike religion, it doesn’t promise truth, only interpretation. Would people still turn to it for guidance?

Reply.
Information sender

VLDau Viet Long

This statement challenges me to think about what poetry is for. If it addressed deeper human concerns—the search for love, justice, belonging—could it reach as many people as religion does? Or has poetry become too private to serve collective needs? I admire Stevens’s faith in poetry’s potential, but I also wonder if it can ever rival something as deeply ingrained as spiritual belief.

Reply.
Information sender

HNHa Nguyen

I find this idea both daring and beautiful. Stevens implies that poetry once had, or could have, the same moral and emotional weight as sacred texts. It makes me wonder whether art and faith fulfill similar roles—both giving people meaning, comfort, and purpose. Maybe the problem isn’t poetry itself, but the way modern society has replaced contemplation with distraction.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender