If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the

If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the

22/09/2025
23/10/2025

If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.

If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the
If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the

Host: The evening fog rolled in over the harbor, thick as memory, soft as dust. The old warehouse had been converted into a writer’s co-op — all exposed brick, half-burned candles, and the smell of ink and paper trying to outlive time. A single lamp glowed in the corner, spilling a warm circle of gold over a table strewn with manuscripts, coffee cups, and failed metaphors.

Host: Jack sat there, jacket off, sleeves rolled, a pen clenched between his fingers like a weapon. Pages lay scattered before him — words scratched out, sentences revised, whole paragraphs bleeding in red ink. Jeeny entered quietly, her steps soft on the wooden floor, holding two cups of black coffee.

Jeeny: “You’re at it again.”

Jack: “Yeah.” He didn’t look up. “I’m trying to find the heartbeat in a corpse.”

Jeeny: “That bad?”

Jack: “Worse. It’s clean.”

Host: Jeeny raised an eyebrow, setting his cup down beside him.

Jeeny: “Clean?”

Jack: “Yeah. Grammatically perfect. Emotionally dead.”

Host: She smiled faintly, the kind of smile that knew too much about the ache of creation.

Jeeny: “Marianne Moore would’ve loved that line.”

Jack: Glances up. “Oh?”

Jeeny: “She once said, ‘If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the writer is an artist.’

Jack: “Ah, yes. The poet of precision. Figures you’d bring her up tonight.”

Jeeny: “Why not? You’ve been chasing form all week. Maybe she’s whispering to you.”

Jack: “Form’s all I’ve got left. Emotion’s gone dry. I keep thinking if I get the rhythm right, the truth will come back.”

Jeeny: “And does it?”

Jack: Pauses. “Sometimes. For a moment. But then it feels fake again. Like I’m painting passion with numbers.”

Host: The lamp flickered, and the faint sound of rain began to tap against the windows — the kind of rhythm that invites reflection.

Jeeny: “You think technique kills emotion?”

Jack: “I think it sedates it. Makes it behave.”

Jeeny: “Or maybe it lets it live longer. Technique is how emotion survives its first draft.”

Jack: “You make it sound noble.”

Jeeny: “It is. Art without structure is just a cry in the dark. It might be real, but it doesn’t echo.”

Host: Jack leaned back, his chair creaking, his eyes tired but curious.

Jack: “So you think technique is the soul of art?”

Jeeny: “No. I think it’s the skeleton. You still need blood, heart, breath — but without the bones, everything collapses.”

Host: The rain thickened, streaking the glass. A gust of wind crept through the old building, shivering the candle flame.

Jack: “Funny. When I started writing, I didn’t care about commas or cadence. I just wrote. Words poured out. They were messy, alive. Now, all I do is measure the rhythm of every line, and somehow the music’s gone.”

Jeeny: “Because you’re listening too hard for perfection, not truth.”

Jack: “But Moore said—”

Jeeny: “She said technique matters. Not perfection. Technique is curiosity about craft. It’s devotion, not obsession.”

Host: Jack’s eyes narrowed, thoughtful, the way they used to when an argument cut deeper than he expected.

Jack: “So what’s the difference between devotion and obsession?”

Jeeny: “Love and fear.”

Host: The rain softened, beating in time with her words. She sipped her coffee, her gaze steady, her voice gentle, but unflinching.

Jeeny: “You work because you’re afraid of losing control. Moore worked because she loved the control — because she saw the art inside the discipline. That’s the difference.”

Jack: “You’re saying I’ve stopped loving it.”

Jeeny: “No. I’m saying you’re trying to control what can’t be controlled — inspiration. You can’t choke the muse into staying. You can only build a space where it wants to return.”

Host: The room fell quiet, filled only with the sound of rain, pen scratches, and the low hum of the lamp.

Jack: “You ever wonder if maybe she was wrong? Maybe technique is the death of impulse. Maybe artists are born, not built.”

Jeeny: “Then why do we study music, painting, film? Why rehearse? Why edit?”

Jack: “Because the world demands polish.”

Jeeny: “No, Jack. Because the heart demands clarity. Technique doesn’t polish emotion — it gives it voice.”

Host: He leaned forward, elbows on the table, pen tapping against paper like a heartbeat trying to return to rhythm.

Jack: “You sound like you actually believe mastery is love.”

Jeeny: “It is. You master something because you care about it enough to refine it. Technique is what separates passion from impulse.”

Jack: “And yet, some of the greatest works were accidents.”

Jeeny: “And most of the forgotten ones were, too.”

Host: A small smile crossed his face — reluctant, but real. The kind of smile that belongs to someone who just lost an argument and found peace in it.

Jack: “You really think an artist who ignores technique isn’t an artist?”

Jeeny: “I think they’re still an artist — just an incomplete one. Talent gives you the song. Technique teaches you how to sing it without losing your voice.”

Jack: “Then what’s left of the soul in all that discipline?”

Jeeny: “Everything. Because discipline isn’t the opposite of soul. It’s what allows the soul to be understood.”

Host: Her words fell like soft footsteps across the page. Jack looked down at his manuscript — the lines still red with edits, still bleeding from his frustration.

He picked up the pen again, not to fix, but to listen.

Jack: “You know… maybe Moore wasn’t defending technique. Maybe she was defending care — the kind of care that refuses to treat words like tools.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. She wasn’t saying ‘write perfectly.’ She was saying ‘love your craft enough to struggle for it.’”

Host: The rain had stopped now. The fog outside lifted slightly, the harbor lights flickering like forgotten memories trying to be remembered.

Jack: “You think she ever doubted herself?”

Jeeny: “All artists do. But doubt’s the shadow of devotion. You can’t care deeply without questioning deeply.”

Host: He nodded slowly, setting the pen down, looking not at the page — but at her.

Jack: “You know, I started writing to make sense of the world. Now I think I write to make sense of myself.”

Jeeny: “Then technique is your mirror. It forces you to see what’s real, and what’s just noise.”

Host: The lamp flickered again, then steadied. The candle burned low, its flame small but unyielding.

Jeeny: “Moore was right, Jack. Technique isn’t about showing off skill. It’s about respect — for language, for truth, for the act itself.”

Jack: “Respect.” He said it softly, tasting the word like a prayer.

Jeeny: “Yes. Art dies when it stops respecting its own craft.”

Host: He smiled again — this time lighter, freer. His hand moved to the page, no longer as a surgeon but as a listener. He began to write, slowly, rhythmically, as though rediscovering his own pulse.

Jeeny watched, silent, knowing something sacred had begun to move again.

Host: Outside, the fog thinned, revealing faint stars reflected on the water’s surface. The city hummed, low and far away, like the steady breathing of a world that keeps creating despite itself.

Host: And as the night deepened, and the ink flowed — imperfect, alive — the words took root again. Not out of perfection, but devotion.

Host: Marianne Moore’s echo lingered in the air, not as command, but as truth:

That technique is not the enemy of art
it is its discipline, its devotion,
its proof of love for the unseen shape of beauty.

Host: And there, between ink and silence, Jack and Jeeny found what every artist searches for —
not perfection,
but presence.

Marianne Moore
Marianne Moore

American - Poet November 15, 1887 - February 5, 1972

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment If technique is of no interest to a writer, I doubt that the

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender