If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to

If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to

22/09/2025
21/10/2025

If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.

If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to those of married couples, there is no discrimination in law, and if civil partnerships are seen as somehow 'second class' that is a social attitude which will change and cannot, in any case, be turned around by redefining the law of marriage.
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to
If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to

Host:
The rain fell steadily, its sound almost hypnotic against the old windowpanes. The city outside was bathed in the cold, pale light of streetlamps, casting long shadows that stretched like mournful fingers over the wet pavement. Inside, a small café sat quietly under the weight of the evening — the warm yellow glow of its lights offering a refuge from the chill outside. The clink of cups and the soft hum of quiet conversations filled the air, a steady rhythm that softened the stillness.

Jack sat at the back of the café, his hand wrapped around a warm mug of coffee, his gaze distant, lost in the darkened corners of his thoughts. Jeeny, across from him, was flipping through the pages of a book, the corners of her lips turning upward as she read, yet there was a softness to her expression that suggested she was lost in her own contemplation.

The world seemed to move slowly around them, as if waiting for the moment when their conversation would start — when the ideas that had been sitting heavy on their minds would finally break free.

Jack:
(he leans back, his voice quiet)
"I was reading something today by John Sentamu. It was about civil partnerships and marriage — how, in the law, there’s no discrimination between the two. He said that if civil partnerships are seen as ‘second class,’ that’s a social attitude, not something that should change the law."

(He pauses, his fingers tapping absentmindedly on his mug.)
"It got me thinking. If the law doesn’t distinguish between the two, does that mean the fight is really just a matter of perception? And if it is, can we really change it just by redefining marriage?"

Jeeny:
(she closes the book and sets it down gently, her voice steady but thoughtful)
"Sentamu’s point makes sense, in a way. The law, in its purest form, shouldn’t be swayed by social opinion. It should be about equal rights, regardless of the social attitudes that surround something like marriage or civil partnerships."

(She tilts her head slightly, looking at him with a soft, searching gaze.)
"But I think the deeper question is whether those social attitudes should be ignored or accepted as part of the process of change. It’s not just about redefining marriage legally; it’s about the shift in society that must accompany it."

(She smiles faintly, as if she knows the next words are going to be important.)
"Change doesn’t just come from rewriting the law. It comes from rewriting the hearts and minds of the people who live with it."

Host:
The warmth of the café contrasts sharply with the distance between their words — each of them thinking, feeling, and questioning something deeper than just the politics of the moment. Outside, the streetlights flicker, casting brief moments of clarity before the darkness swallows them whole again. Jack’s eyes search the window, his expression uncertain, while Jeeny looks at him as if trying to find the right way to speak, the right words to make him understand.

Jack:
(he leans forward slightly, his voice growing more intense)
"Right, but isn’t that part of the problem? We’re talking about a social attitude — a belief system that’s been ingrained for centuries. The law can be one thing, but people are what really shape society. And until people see civil partnerships and marriages as equal, isn’t it just going to be a battle of semantics?"

(He gestures around them, his hand moving across the air like a wave, trying to encompass everything.)
"It’s like saying the law says everyone is equal, but in practice, they’re treated differently because they’re not viewed that way. If we redefine marriage without changing the way people see it, we’re just masking the real issue."

Jeeny:
(she smiles softly, but there’s a hint of sadness in her eyes)
"I don’t think Sentamu meant to say that the issue of perception isn’t important. He was just acknowledging that there’s a difference between changing the law and changing how people view something."

(She takes a deep breath, her voice calm and measured.)
"Yes, people’s perceptions are slow to change. Yes, it’s uncomfortable when something we’ve believed in for so long is suddenly questioned. But I believe the law can lead that change. It may take time, but if the legal side of things shifts, society will begin to catch up. It’s like seeds being planted in soil. You don’t see the growth right away, but it’s happening."

(She leans forward, her hands folded on the table, her gaze steady and warm.)
"You’re right that it’s about perception. But we can’t wait for everyone to be comfortable with something before we make the changes that need to happen."

Host:
The conversation is a soft whisper now, the outside world seemingly holding its breath as the words linger. The warmth in the room feels more like a balm than a comfort, easing the edges of a topic that has cut too deep for too long. Jeeny’s calm demeanor is a quiet strength, while Jack’s internal battle is obvious — a tension between what is right and what he feels should be done, what society can handle and what it needs.

Jack:
(he nods slowly, his voice quieter now)
"I get what you’re saying. But do you think people will ever be ready for it? If they’ve been taught one thing for so long, how can we just expect them to change their minds when the law changes? What happens when the social system isn’t ready for it?"

(He glances at her, his gaze softening, as if opening himself to her thoughts.)
"Maybe it’s easier for me to see things in terms of law — black and white. But you’re right. It’s the hearts of people that will ultimately decide if we’re ever really equal."

Jeeny:
(she reaches across the table, her hand resting gently on his)
"I think the law can start the shift, Jack. It must start there. The rest follows. Change isn’t immediate, but it’s possible. Just because something hasn’t been accepted yet doesn’t mean it never will be."

(She smiles softly, her fingers squeezing his lightly.)
"It’s not about forcing people to change overnight. It’s about giving them a reason to. And gradually, they will. It may be slow, but real change takes time — and time is on our side."

Host:
The stillness between them is now a fragile understanding, as if the weight of their conversation has settled somewhere deeper than either of them realized. The rain has stopped outside, but the air remains heavy with possibility. They sit, side by side, connected by the weight of a future that neither can fully see, but both can feel beginning to take shape in the spaces between them.

Jack’s fingers, still resting near hers, seem to tremble slightly — a quiet acknowledgment of what he’s just begun to grasp. Jeeny’s eyes, soft and steady, hold a depth that tells him she knows the battle isn’t over, but that it’s worth fighting.

Jack:
(softly)
"Maybe the law doesn’t change the hearts of people, but it does give them something to live up to."

Jeeny:
(smiling)
"Exactly. And when the law stands for equality, society will learn to follow. Maybe not all at once, but over time. Change doesn’t need to be sudden to be real."

Host:
The conversation lingers like a song you can’t quite forget. The café, now quiet, holds the truth of their words as the final whispers of the evening slip into the night. The world will take time to adjust — it always does. But change, like rain falling gently from the sky, starts with the smallest drops. And in the silence between them, Jack and Jeeny both feel that shift beginning, not just in law, but in their own hearts.

John Sentamu
John Sentamu

Ugandan - Clergyman Born: June 10, 1949

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment If the rights of civil partners are met differently in law to

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender