I'm not a political person. When I start to get into it, it just
I'm not a political person. When I start to get into it, it just upsets me. I feel so powerless when it comes to politics. So I've just decided to be non-political and very, very pro-soldier.
Hear, O children of weariness and truth, the plain yet heavy words of Channing Tatum: “I’m not a political person. When I start to get into it, it just upsets me. I feel so powerless when it comes to politics. So I’ve just decided to be non-political and very, very pro-soldier.” In this confession lies the cry of many: the recognition that politics, far from empowering, often breeds despair, leaving the individual adrift in a sea of arguments, corruption, and endless division.
For Tatum speaks of powerlessness—that gnawing sense that one voice cannot change the machinery of government. In such a state, a man turns from politics, not from indifference, but from exhaustion. He chooses instead to honor what he can grasp and love directly: the sacrifice of the soldier, who bears the weight of duty regardless of the failures of leaders. In this, we see a shift from abstract systems to tangible loyalty.
History has often seen this divide. During the Vietnam War, many despised the politics that sent young men into jungles to die, yet still honored the soldiers who went because they believed it their duty. Families in America mourned sons and brothers, scorning the politics that betrayed them but cherishing their courage. Here lies Tatum’s spirit: to turn away from the rancor of politics but remain steadfast in gratitude to those who bleed in its shadow.
This stance is neither cowardice nor apathy. It is the recognition that while few can change the course of nations, all can choose where to place their loyalty, their respect, and their love. By lifting up the soldier, Tatum seeks to honor sacrifice itself, even when the cause of that sacrifice is entangled in a politics he cannot bear to face.
Therefore, O seekers of wisdom, learn this lesson: when the realm of politics overwhelms, it is no shame to retreat to what is human and close at hand. Yet one must remember, too, that soldiers march at the bidding of politics, and to be truly “pro-soldier” is to strive for a world where their sacrifice is not wasted by folly. Tatum’s words remind us that though we may feel powerless, even the smallest acts of honor and remembrance carry their own strength.
KLKhanh Linh
Channing Tatum’s approach to being non-political and pro-soldier seems to come from a place of emotional exhaustion with the state of politics. It’s understandable to feel powerless, but I wonder if turning away from politics completely is a solution. Can we truly support our soldiers without understanding the broader political systems they are part of? Does detaching from politics mean we avoid tough questions about military action and policy?
BDBon Doan
I understand Channing Tatum’s frustration, but I question if being non-political is an effective way to navigate a complex world. Does disengagement actually solve the feeling of powerlessness, or does it just make it easier to ignore tough conversations? Being supportive of soldiers is important, but can we do that while being passive about the politics that directly affect their lives and the decisions they face?
HTHue Thanh
Tatum’s statement makes me wonder about the tension between being apolitical and supporting causes like the military, which are deeply tied to political decisions. How can one be pro-soldier but non-political? Is it even possible to truly separate these two, or does engaging with one require an understanding of the political systems that shape it? It’s an interesting dilemma that many people probably face when they feel disillusioned with politics.
BTTruong Bao Thy
I understand Channing Tatum’s frustration with politics—it can often feel overwhelming and divisive. But I do wonder if his decision to be non-political truly leaves him uninvolved, or if he’s still engaging in the political process indirectly by supporting soldiers. Can being non-political in today’s world truly allow someone to avoid powerlessness, or does it create a different kind of disengagement with the world’s challenges?
THNguyen thi hong
Tatum’s choice to be non-political while still being pro-soldier raises an interesting question about how people view politics. Can you separate support for the military from political involvement? Does his frustration with politics reflect a broader sense of powerlessness that many people feel? I wonder if this approach helps him maintain peace of mind, but at what cost in terms of engaging with societal issues that impact soldiers and the military at large?