Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the

Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.

Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the
Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the

Host: The rain had stopped, but the sky still glowed with the residue of storm light — that eerie, electric haze that lingers between thunder and silence. A city skyline shimmered in the distance, its glass towers blinking like constellations of ambition. Down below, in a quiet riverside café, two figures sat across from each other — Jack and Jeeny — their reflections swimming together in the darkened windowpane.

The steam from Jeeny’s tea rose in fragile spirals, while Jack’s black coffee sat untouched, its surface reflecting the neon sign above them that read simply: Tomorrow.

Jack: “Neil deGrasse Tyson said, ‘Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the 21st-century economy; if you care about the wealth and health of your nation tomorrow, then you'd better rethink how you allocate taxes to fund science. The federal budget needs to recognize this.’

He leaned forward, his grey eyes sharp beneath the low light. “And he’s right — but the irony is, people only realize it when the engine stalls.”

Jeeny: “Or when the engine leaves people behind. You talk about innovation like it’s salvation. But what good is a machine that moves faster than the souls it carries?”

Host: A gust of wind brushed against the window, and for a moment, the reflection of the city lights fractured across the glass — a digital heartbeat pulsing against the night.

Jack: “You’re romanticizing stagnation. Science isn’t cold — it’s survival. Look at vaccines, satellites, AI — these aren’t luxuries, they’re lifelines. Without investment, the whole structure collapses.”

Jeeny: “And yet, the structure already excludes most of the world. We pour billions into machines that reach Mars while children starve on Earth. Tell me, Jack — is that the ‘health of a nation’ Tyson was talking about?”

Jack: “You can’t fix poverty by rejecting progress. You fix it by expanding it. Science creates tools — it’s society’s job to use them wisely.”

Jeeny: “Then why doesn’t it? Why do we fund billionaires to colonize space while hospitals can’t afford clean water filters? Don’t tell me that’s wisdom — that’s worshipping the wrong god.”

Host: The light flickered, and a passing train rumbled in the distance, its echo trembling through the floorboards. Jack’s hands tightened around his cup, the sound of ceramic scraping wood punctuating the air.

Jack: “You’re mistaking greed for science. The problem isn’t discovery — it’s distribution. Tyson’s right. The budget doesn’t fail science; politics does. If nations funded research like they fund wars, we’d cure half the world’s suffering before breakfast.”

Jeeny: “And yet science itself often fuels those wars. The same labs that invent vaccines design drones. The same equations that heal are used to kill. You want funding — fine. But where’s the conscience that should guide it?”

Jack: “Conscience is the luxury of stability. When your infrastructure’s crumbling, when disease spreads, when economies collapse — you don’t philosophize; you innovate or die.”

Jeeny: “And what happens when you innovate without conscience? You survive — but lose what makes survival worth it.”

Host: The silence thickened, filled only by the sound of rain dripping from the roof’s edge. The city outside pulsed with muted life — cars sliding through puddles, distant voices blurring into an electric murmur.

Jeeny: “Do you remember the Manhattan Project, Jack? Science saved the world — and doomed it. One discovery, two bombs, hundreds of thousands dead. That’s the shadow of unchecked innovation.”

Jack: “And yet it ended a war that might’ve killed millions more. That’s the paradox, Jeeny — progress always casts a shadow. You can’t reject the light because it burns.”

Jeeny: “No. But you can aim it better. You can choose to illuminate rather than incinerate.”

Host: Jeeny’s voice softened, but her eyes blazed — two dark fires flickering in the dim light. Jack exhaled, the sound half sigh, half surrender.

Jack: “You know, Tyson’s point wasn’t about morality. It was about momentum. Science is the economy now. Nations that starve research starve themselves. Look at history — the countries that funded curiosity built the future. The ones that didn’t are still digging for yesterday.”

Jeeny: “And yet, Jack, look closer — every great technological leap came with human cost. The Industrial Revolution brought both progress and exploitation. Silicon Valley gave us global connection — and isolation. Progress without compassion is just evolution without empathy.”

Jack: “Maybe empathy is a privilege of the well-fed. When your country’s drowning in debt, compassion doesn’t keep the lights on. Innovation does.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe the lights aren’t worth keeping on if they only shine for a few.”

Host: The tension tightened, vibrating through the air like the final note of a struck chord. Outside, the river reflected the city’s glow — a perfect mirror, trembling with the wind.

Jack: “You really think emotion can power a nation? That belief can replace budgets?”

Jeeny: “No. But I think budgets without belief build machines, not civilizations.”

Jack: “Machines are civilization. The printing press, the steam engine, the computer — each one reshaped what it meant to be human.”

Jeeny: “And each time, we nearly lost our humanity trying to catch up. Don’t you see? Every invention changes us faster than we can understand it. Maybe the question isn’t how much we fund science — but how much of ourselves we’re willing to lose in the process.”

Jack: “We lose more by standing still. Nature doesn’t wait. Neither does history.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe progress should slow down enough to remember who it’s running over.”

Host: The storm clouds parted, and a thin blade of moonlight cut across the table, striking the empty cups. It turned the coffee blacker, the tea golden, as though light itself was choosing sides.

Jack: “So what, we fund feelings now?”

Jeeny: “No. We fund foresight. We teach ethics alongside engineering. We remember that technology isn’t destiny — it’s direction.”

Jack: “Direction needs fuel.”

Jeeny: “And purpose needs steering.”

Host: A moment passed, and the sound of a clock ticking filled the room — slow, deliberate, like the heartbeat of something ancient.

Jack: “Maybe that’s what Tyson meant. Not just that science drives the economy — but that the economy decides what kind of science survives.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. Fund the science that heals, not the kind that harms. The wealth and health of a nation aren’t separate — they’re siblings. One grows sick, the other dies.”

Jack: “Then what would you do? Rewrite the budget? Preach compassion to politicians?”

Jeeny: “I’d start smaller. Teach a child to wonder, not to profit. Fund curiosity, not just commerce. If science is the engine, wonder is the spark.”

Host: The wind softened, the city lights steadied, and for a moment the world outside seemed to pause — suspended between circuitry and soul. Jack leaned back, rubbing his temples, the weight of her words settling like dust on old convictions.

Jack: “You know, I used to believe technology would save us. But maybe it’s only half the equation.”

Jeeny: “Then you’re halfway to wisdom.”

Jack: “And what’s the other half?”

Jeeny: “Remembering who it’s for.”

Host: Jeeny smiled faintly, her eyes catching the shimmer of the city skyline, where innovation glowed in every window, every pulse of light — a symphony of creation and consequence.

Jack followed her gaze, his expression softening, as if realizing that progress itself could be both prayer and peril.

Outside, the river carried reflections of the city’s towers — a quiet metaphor drifting on dark water: the dream of humanity rising above its own shadow.

And as they sat in that stillness, the night whispered the truth behind Tyson’s warning —

That the engines of progress can power both wealth and ruin,
That science is only as moral as the hands that fund it,
And that the true measure of a nation’s health lies not in how far its machines can reach —
but in how deeply its people remember why they were built to begin with.

The moonlight dimmed. The city hummed on. And the engine of the 21st century — both brilliant and broken — kept turning beneath them, waiting to see which direction humanity would steer next.

Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil deGrasse Tyson

American - Scientist Born: October 5, 1958

With the author

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment Innovations in science and technology are the engines of the

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender