It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a

It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.

It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a
It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a

Hear, O children of wisdom, the stirring words of Tristram Stuart, who cast light upon a truth both uncomfortable and urgent: “It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a monastic state of meatlessness while everyone else gorges their way towards environmental meltdown or the nearest heart clinic. Vegetarianism is good for the willing minority, but not much use as a campaign tool.” This is no jest nor idle remark, but a cry from one who has seen the folly of nations. For in his voice we hear the warning that small sacrifices, though noble, cannot alone turn aside the flood of destruction, when the many still rush blindly toward ruin.

The meaning of this teaching is sharp and clear. Vegetarianism, though noble and healthful, practiced by only a few, cannot save the earth if the vast majority continue their reckless indulgence in meat, heedless of consequence. The 2%, those who live as though in monasteries of discipline, serve as examples of virtue—but their influence fades if the multitude remain unchanged. Stuart reminds us that the crisis we face—be it environmental collapse or the epidemic of disease—cannot be solved by the few alone. The burden must be borne by society as a whole, not as scattered sparks, but as a fire that lights the world.

Consider the tale of the ancient Romans, who built aqueducts, roads, and empires. A few voices warned against excess—against the feasting, the gluttony, the revels that weakened body and spirit. Yet these voices were but whispers, lost amid the clamor of the banquets. When the multitude cared only for bread and circuses, Rome decayed from within, her strength consumed by indulgence. Even so in our age: a few abstain in discipline, yet the many gorge themselves toward ill health and the earth toward devastation. And unless the multitude awakens, no solitary virtue will prevent the collapse.

Stuart’s words speak especially to our age of climate peril. The raising of cattle and the slaughter of billions consume the forests, poison the waters, and fill the skies with gases that hasten warming. To abstain from meat is indeed a righteous act, and its benefits are many—less cruelty, less waste, less harm. But if only a minority embrace this way, the great machinery of destruction roars on, unbroken. The problem is not one of individuals alone, but of systems, of nations, of the very structure of consumption. One cannot mend a shattered dam with a single stone.

Yet do not mistake Stuart’s cry as a dismissal of the vegetarian path. Rather, it is a call to something greater: to build movements that embrace the multitude, to create change that shifts cultures and systems, not merely the habits of the faithful few. He reminds us that virtue must be coupled with strategy, that private sacrifice must become public transformation. The lone pilgrim inspires, but the march of the people remakes the world.

Mark this well, O listener: if you are one of the few who walk the path of restraint, your example shines like a lamp in the darkness. But do not let it end there. Use your light to kindle the lamps of others, to build communities, to reshape policies, to inspire the multitudes. For it is not enough to save oneself; one must seek to save the earth, the air, the waters, the children yet unborn. Individual virtue must become collective action, or else it remains a whisper drowned by the storm.

Let this be the lesson: do not despise small acts of virtue, but neither be content with them alone. Share them, multiply them, and bind them into movements that touch the lives of the many. Teach your neighbors, demand of your leaders, reshape your societies so that the burden of the earth is lightened by all and not by a chosen few. For salvation, whether of body or planet, cannot rest upon the shoulders of 2% alone—it must be the work of the multitude.

Therefore, walk as Stuart counsels: honor the discipline of the willing minority, but strive to awaken the unwilling majority. For only when the crowd joins the few, only when the multitude learns restraint, can we turn aside from both environmental meltdown and the cold walls of the heart clinic, and walk instead into a future of health, abundance, and harmony with the earth.

Tristram Stuart
Tristram Stuart

English - Author Born: 1977

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment It is all very well for 2% of the population to live in a

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender