It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that
It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power.
“It is said that power corrupts, but actually it's more true that power attracts the corruptible. The sane are usually attracted by other things than power.” These words from David Brin unveil a profound truth that resonates through the corridors of history: power does not, in itself, corrupt the soul, but instead, it draws to it those whose hearts are already bent toward greed, ambition, and self-interest. The wise, the sane, and the humble, are rarely captivated by the allure of power, for they seek fulfillment in higher things — love, wisdom, virtue, and peace. The corruptible are the ones who are most drawn to the glittering promise of control and domination.
In the ancient world, the great philosophers warned of the dangers of power. Plato, in his Republic, spoke of the philosopher-king, a ruler who would only seek power because of his deep understanding of truth and justice. He believed that only the sane could wield power responsibly, and that those who sought it for its own sake were often driven by motives that led to tyranny. For when power is sought for personal gain, it becomes a corrupting force — one that leads to the downfall of the individual and the state alike.
Consider the rise of the Roman Emperor Julius Caesar, a man of extraordinary power, whose ambition led him to cross the Rubicon and march on Rome. He did not seek power for the sake of justice or wisdom, but to fulfill his own ambitions. His rise to dominance was not merely a result of his strength, but of the corruptible nature of those around him, drawn to his vision of control and authority. In the end, his quest for power led to his assassination, showing that those who are most attracted to power are often those least equipped to wield it.
In contrast, we have the example of Socrates, who cared not for power, but for the search for truth. He did not seek the approval of the powerful nor did he seek to amass followers. Instead, he was devoted to the pursuit of wisdom and understanding, often challenging the established power structures of his time. His focus was on the inner life, the cultivation of virtue, and the improvement of the soul, not on the fleeting allure of power. His example shows us that the sane are attracted to higher pursuits, and it is only those who seek control over others who are drawn to the world of power.
This principle holds true in the story of the philosopher-king in ancient India, Ashoka the Great. After a brutal war of conquest, Ashoka had a profound transformation, abandoning his pursuit of power for the sake of conquest and turning instead toward peace and compassion. His story stands as a testament to the fact that true power is not in dominion over others, but in the wisdom to seek harmony and justice. Ashoka’s shift in focus away from power towards personal transformation illustrates that those who are truly sane will seek higher paths, not the trappings of power.
Thus, let us remember Brin’s words and reflect upon the nature of power. It is not the power itself that corrupts, but the soul that is already inclined toward corruption. True greatness is not found in the quest for dominance but in the pursuit of wisdom, justice, and love. Let us, like the ancients, seek a higher calling — one that transcends the temptations of power and leads us toward a life of virtue and service.
LLDuong Tran Luu Ly
David Brin’s statement got me thinking about why some people are so drawn to power. Could it be that the corruptible are motivated by a need for validation, or is it the fear of being powerless that drives them? It’s curious that Brin suggests that those who are sane are attracted to other things. What might those things be? Could the pursuit of knowledge, creativity, or compassion be healthier alternatives to seeking power?
VKPham van khoa
Brin’s interpretation of power is fascinating, but it also makes me question the relationship between power and responsibility. If power attracts corruptible individuals, how can we ensure that those in power are held accountable for their actions? Can checks and balances truly safeguard against this dynamic, or is it inevitable that power will always attract those who seek to exploit it for their own gain? What structures can we put in place to prevent this?
KKohgvbjih
This perspective changes how we view leadership. If power attracts the corruptible, does it mean that truly effective leaders are those who are not primarily motivated by the pursuit of power? Could we be better off if we focused on individuals who have the desire to serve and help others rather than those who are driven by ambition and control? How do we identify such leaders in a world so focused on power and status?
OSofficial saubi
Brin’s point about power attracting the corruptible rather than corrupting them is thought-provoking. It makes me wonder—if the ‘sane’ are typically not drawn to power, what exactly motivates them? Do those who avoid power have a different kind of fulfillment, or do they just lack the desire to impose influence on others? I wonder if avoiding power is actually a form of wisdom or a missed opportunity for positive change.
NBNghi Bui
I agree with Brin's idea that power attracts the corruptible, but this also raises a deeper question: why do people with questionable values gravitate toward power in the first place? Is it because they believe they can use power to their advantage, or is it more about the ability to control others? Does this dynamic explain why some people seem so driven by ambition, even at the cost of others' well-being?