It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports

It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports

22/09/2025
20/10/2025

It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?

It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn't support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats. When I put it like that, it sounds like, 'Well, yeah,' but you start to think, 'Why not, though?' What makes one more valuable than another?
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports
It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports

Host: The city was humming like a restless instrument—its rhythms born of traffic, screens, and breathing neon. Outside the window, the skyline throbbed in electric color, as if each tower was another note in a song too loud to ignore. Inside, the studio was dim, its walls lined with old vinyls, cables, and the soft glow of blinking soundboards.

Host: Jack sat in front of the mixing console, his hands moving across the sliders like a conductor controlling both chaos and order. Across from him, Jeeny leaned against a stack of speakers, her arms crossed, her eyes alive with a mixture of curiosity and fire. The air was warm, filled with the faint hum of electricity—and something unspoken.

Host: A quote hung in the room like a challenge left on the table. David Byrne’s words: “It’s a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports symphonies and operas and doesn’t support Johnny learning to program hip-hop beats… What makes one more valuable than another?”

Jeeny: “That’s it, isn’t it? The great hypocrisy of culture. We call art sacred—but only when it’s expensive, exclusive, and endorsed by the people who can afford to love it.”

Jack: (adjusting the volume knob) “Maybe that’s because art isn’t about truth, Jeeny. It’s about taste—and taste has always been the currency of the elite. A symphony tells the world, ‘I understand refinement.’ A beat tells the world, ‘I understand survival.’ And no one wants to be reminded they’re just surviving.”

Host: The bassline from the nearby speaker throbbed softly, like the heartbeat of the city itself. Jeeny’s eyes followed the rhythm, her foot tapping, unconsciously, to something raw, alive, and true.

Jeeny: “But isn’t that the point, Jack? Survival is the real symphony. It’s what drives the heart, what creates meaning. The kid in the basement, programming beats on a second-hand laptop, is closer to the truth of our time than a millionaire in a velvet box seat.”

Jack: “You’re romanticizing the underdog again. The 1% supports operas because they’re timeless, structured, elegant. They’re an ideal of order. Hip-hop, street art, graffiti—those are moments. They burn hot, but they fade. One’s built to last, the other to shout.”

Jeeny: “Or maybe the shout is what lasts. People remember fire, not polish. The Renaissance had patrons, but the streets had revolution. Mozart needed the palace, but Marley needed the people.”

Host: Her words struck like a drumbeat, echoing in the small space. The lights of the mixer flickered in time with her passion.

Jack: “Still, you can’t ignore structure. The world needs systems, not just sentiment. It’s easy to praise Johnny’s beats, but it takes an entire orchestra to play Beethoven. Maybe the 1% supports what requires discipline, training, sacrifice.”

Jeeny: “And who can afford that training, Jack? Who decides which discipline gets to be called art and which gets dismissed as noise? You talk about structure, but the structure itself is rigged. The system celebrates exclusivity, not expression.”

Host: The soundboard lights pulsed again, as if the machine itself was listening. Outside, the rain began to fall, a syncopated rhythm against the windowpane—an urban symphony of its own.

Jack: “You think the system is evil. But without it, how would art survive? Patrons have always funded it—the church, the court, the corporation. Without money, even rebellion goes silent.”

Jeeny: “But what if money is the silencer? What if art doesn’t need the system, only the space to exist? When a child creates a beat in their room, they’re not asking for permission. They’re speaking the language of their time. That’s art in its purest form—unauthorized truth.”

Host: The rain grew heavier, and the room’s hum seemed to deepen, as though the weather itself were joining the debate. The neon outside the window cast a shifting blue glow across their faces—one half shadow, one half light.

Jack: “So what, Jeeny? Do we throw out tradition? Cancel Mozart because Johnny has a new beat? Culture isn’t a zero-sum game. The opera and the 808 can both exist.”

Jeeny: “They can, but they don’t—not equally. The opera house gets funded, the community center gets shut down. The rich build museums, but they won’t step into a cypher or fund a public art class. The hierarchy of art is the hierarchy of power—disguised as taste.”

Host: Her voice trembled, not with anger, but with conviction. It was the sound of someone who had seen too many voices ignored because they didn’t fit the score.

Jack: “But don’t you see? Without that hierarchy, we’d drown in mediocrity. Not every sound deserves to be symphonic. Not every expression is art.”

Jeeny: “And who decides that, Jack? You? The critics? The donors in tuxedos who’ve never felt a kick drum in their chest? The beauty of art is that it’s democratic, not decorated. It belongs to whoever feels it—not whoever funds it.”

Host: The thunder rumbled faintly in the distance, the storm now a low pulse beneath their words. Jack rubbed his temple, his expression softening.

Jack: “Maybe you’re right. Maybe I’ve mistaken preservation for preference. Maybe the symphony endures because it’s been protected, not because it’s inherently better.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. The violin was once a folk instrument. The piano was a luxury. What’s considered high art today was once called vulgar. The difference isn’t talent, Jack—it’s who’s listening.”

Host: A long silence fell between them, filled only by the beat of the rain and the faint loop of a rhythm still playing in the background—something simple, modern, and strangely beautiful.

Jack: “Maybe that’s the point, Jeeny. Maybe the world needs both—the discipline of the symphony, and the freedom of the beat. One teaches us structure, the other reminds us we’re alive.”

Jeeny: “Yes. But until we fund both with the same faith, we’re not a civilization—we’re just a curated playlist.”

Host: Her smile was faint, but it carried a light of quiet truth. The storm began to fade, the city’s rhythm returning—cars, sirens, music, all blending into one vast, imperfect composition.

Jack: “You know what I’d love to see?”

Jeeny: “What?”

Jack: “A symphony opening with a trap beat. A kid from the Bronx conducting strings at Carnegie Hall. A world where no one asks which kind of music is more valuable.”

Jeeny: (smiling) “Then maybe the next revolution won’t happen in the streets or the markets—but in the sound of us finally listening to each other.”

Host: The camera of the night slowly pulled back, showing the city below—thousands of lights, each a different rhythm, each a voice. The music of the world—imperfect, mixed, human—played on.

Host: And in that sound, between the violin and the kick drum, the symphony and the beat, there was finally no hierarchy, no 1%, no other—only the pulse of what it means to create.

David Byrne
David Byrne

Scottish - Musician Born: May 14, 1952

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment It's a fundamental, social attitude that the 1% supports

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender