I've always written, all my life, and when I was very young I
I've always written, all my life, and when I was very young I developed an interest in poetry.
Hear the words of Jeffery Deaver: “I’ve always written, all my life, and when I was very young I developed an interest in poetry.” In this simple remembrance lies the essence of devotion, the way of a soul who has carried the flame of words from childhood into manhood. To say “I have always written” is no light boast; it is a testimony to a life shaped and sustained by language. It is to confess that writing was not a pastime chosen in leisure, but a necessity, as vital as breath, as constant as heartbeat.
The origin of such devotion lies in the innocence of youth. For when the spirit is young, the world is vast and filled with wonder, and the heart seeks vessels to contain its awe. Some turn to painting, some to music, others to silence—but for Deaver, the vessel was poetry. As a child, he discovered that words could not only describe the world but transfigure it. A tree could be more than a tree; it could be memory, symbol, song. A sorrow could be more than a tear; it could be a stanza that carried meaning across time. Thus was his path set, when the first love of poetry took root.
Consider the story of William Wordsworth, who also began as a child in love with language. He walked the lakes and hills of England, storing visions in his young soul. Those early experiences shaped the poet he would become, giving him the power to later write lines like: “The child is father of the man.” Wordsworth believed, as Deaver’s memory suggests, that the passions of youth are not forgotten—they shape destiny. A child’s early encounter with beauty or verse can echo through an entire life.
Deaver’s words remind us, too, of the constancy of practice. To say, “I’ve always written” is to remind us that writing is not the sudden act of inspiration alone. It is a lifelong discipline, a continual shaping of the hand and the mind. Just as the athlete must train daily, so the writer must keep the words flowing, even when the fire feels dim. For in the constancy lies strength, and in the steady devotion lies mastery. The lifelong writer is not one who waits, but one who returns again and again to the page.
And why poetry? Because poetry is the foundation of all writing. To master poetry is to learn rhythm, concision, imagery, and the shaping of truth in its sharpest form. Many great novelists and playwrights began as poets, for poetry trains the ear and the eye to notice what others pass by. It sharpens language to a blade, so that later works in prose may strike deeper. Thus Deaver’s early interest in poetry is not incidental but essential—it was the forge where his voice was tempered.
The lesson for us is clear: cherish the passions of your youth, for they are often the truest guide to your destiny. Do not dismiss the hobbies, the fascinations, the small loves you carried as a child, for they may hold the key to your life’s calling. And above all, cultivate constancy. To say, “I have always written” is to live in a rhythm of faithfulness, never abandoning the craft, even when recognition is far away.
In practice, let each seeker of words take up this command: write daily, as naturally as breathing. Begin as Deaver did—perhaps with poetry, even if rough, even if simple—for it will sharpen your heart and your tongue. Keep a journal, keep a notebook, let your words accompany you through the days of your life. For the more you write, the more your writing will become part of you, until you too may say, without hesitation: “I have always written, all my life.”
Thus Deaver’s teaching endures: writing is not a task, but a life; not a duty, but a devotion. To begin young is to be blessed, but to continue always is to be faithful. If you walk this path, your words may not only carry you through your own days, but may also light the way for generations yet unborn.
HNHuyen Nguyen
Deaver’s lifelong engagement with writing prompts questions about the intersection of talent and habit. Did the continuous practice from a young age give him a unique sensitivity to language, rhythm, or narrative structure? I also wonder what role early influences—books, mentors, or family—played in cultivating his interest. Could someone who discovers poetry or writing later achieve the same depth, or is there something uniquely formative about beginning in childhood? It also makes me reflect on how early creative exploration impacts the emotional and imaginative development that informs later professional work.
NQNguyen Nam Quoc
I find myself reflecting on how early interests can guide career choices and artistic identity. How formative is childhood exposure to writing in determining whether someone becomes a lifelong writer? Did Deaver’s early poetry experiments teach him discipline, or did they simply nurture a love of language that later blossomed into professional writing? I also wonder whether writing from such a young age influences the themes and voice in later works, perhaps creating a distinct signature style that blends youthful curiosity with mature insight. It seems that early passion might provide both a head start and a lasting foundation for creative expression.
TVPham thi tuong van
This makes me curious about the role of passion versus practice. Did Deaver’s early interest in poetry naturally evolve into professional skill, or did he have to deliberately study and refine his craft over time? It also raises questions about motivation—does writing from a young age indicate an intrinsic need to express oneself, or can it be influenced by external encouragement? I wonder whether early exposure to poetry shaped his worldview and creativity in ways that continue to resonate in his works, and whether those who discover writing later in life experience a different kind of development.
QNNgoc quynh Nguyen
I’m struck by the continuity implied here—writing ‘all my life’ suggests a persistent dedication. How does maintaining this habit over decades influence one’s approach to storytelling or language? I also wonder if Deaver’s early focus on poetry affected his later prose writing, perhaps shaping rhythm, imagery, or emotional depth. Does starting with poetry instill a particular sensitivity to language that benefits other literary forms? And are there unique challenges in transitioning from writing poetry to writing longer narrative works, given the differences in structure and pacing?
MDNguyen Duy Minh Duc
It’s interesting to see how early interests can shape a lifelong creative path. I wonder what initially drew Deaver to poetry—was it a particular poem, a teacher, or just an innate attraction to words? Does starting young provide a significant advantage in developing skill and style, or can passion and talent be cultivated later in life with equal intensity? It also makes me curious about the role of childhood experiences and environment in nurturing a writer’s voice and whether early habits of writing influence the types of stories or poems one ultimately produces.