Mathematics is, as it were, a sensuous logic, and relates to
Mathematics is, as it were, a sensuous logic, and relates to philosophy as do the arts, music, and plastic art to poetry.
Hear, O seekers of truth and beauty, the words of Karl Wilhelm Friedrich Schlegel, philosopher of the Romantic age: “Mathematics is, as it were, a sensuous logic, and relates to philosophy as do the arts, music, and plastic art to poetry.” In this vision, he draws together what men so often divide—reason and feeling, number and art, logic and beauty. For Schlegel saw that mathematics, though built on strictness and certainty, possesses a kind of sensuality, a harmony that can stir the heart as deeply as a poem or a song.
The meaning of this teaching is that mathematics is not a cold and sterile system of symbols, but a living logic that appeals to both intellect and sense. It is sensuous, for its patterns, proportions, and symmetries delight the mind as melodies delight the ear. To Schlegel, philosophy and poetry are kin, each shaping how humanity perceives reality. Just as music and the arts give body to poetry, so does mathematics give shape to philosophy, grounding lofty thought in patterns as eternal as the stars.
The origin of these words lies in the Romantic yearning to see unity where the Enlightenment had seen separation. For too long, philosophy and art, reason and imagination, had been sundered. Schlegel, standing in the current of Romanticism, sought to weave them together again, to show that truth is whole. By calling mathematics a sensuous logic, he revealed that it is not merely a tool of science but a bridge between abstract reason and aesthetic beauty, between philosophy and the lived experience of wonder.
Consider the story of Pythagoras, the ancient sage who saw in numbers the very harmony of the cosmos. To him, mathematics was music made visible, and music was mathematics made audible. The ratios of string and tone, of circle and square, revealed an order both logical and divine. Pythagoras did not separate mathematics from art, nor philosophy from poetry—he saw them as one great harmony, as Schlegel himself would later declare.
Think also of Leonardo da Vinci, who drew upon geometry to paint the human form, and upon proportion to construct his visions. To him, mathematics was the hidden skeleton of beauty. The Vitruvian Man, inscribed within circle and square, was not only a diagram but a hymn to the unity of reason and art. Leonardo embodied Schlegel’s vision: the philosopher’s logic and the artist’s passion reconciled through number and form.
O children of wisdom, learn this: do not despise mathematics as a barren land, nor art as an idle dream. Both are rivers flowing from the same source. To study mathematics is to train the mind in harmony; to practice art is to awaken the heart to meaning. When joined, they create a vision of life that is full and luminous. To neglect one for the other is to see with one eye only, to walk with one leg when two are given.
Practical wisdom calls you: approach mathematics not only with discipline, but with reverence for its beauty. See in its equations the elegance of form, the symmetry of truth. When you engage in art, see not only feeling, but the hidden logic that gives it shape. Read philosophy with the mind, but also with the heart, for it is nourished by poetry. And let your life become a harmony of these forces, where thought and beauty, number and song, reason and passion, move together as one.
Therefore, remember the counsel of Schlegel: “Mathematics is, as it were, a sensuous logic.” Let this wisdom free you from the false division of disciplines. For in the dance of numbers and the song of poems, in the strictness of reason and the tenderness of art, lies the fullness of human truth. And the soul that unites them shall walk not in fragments, but in wholeness, seeing the world as one great poem written in logic and one great theorem sung in beauty.
––
NHNhung Hong
I find this comparison between mathematics and the arts incredibly thought-provoking. It suggests that both logic and creativity stem from the same human capacity for pattern recognition and beauty. But does that mean mathematical truths can move us emotionally, the way a painting or a sonata does? Or is Schlegel using metaphor to elevate philosophy and art to the same intellectual status as mathematics? Either way, it’s a bold connection.
QTLuu Quang Tung
This quote makes me question whether all forms of understanding—mathematical, philosophical, or artistic—are just different languages for describing the same human urge to find meaning. Mathematics might express harmony through numbers the way poetry does through words. Do you think Schlegel believed that reason and emotion are actually complementary rather than opposing forces? It’s an appealing thought that logic itself can be beautiful, even sensual.
NTnie taeguk
I love how this idea bridges the gap between rational thought and creative experience. It implies that philosophy and mathematics are not just intellectual disciplines but also forms of artistic expression. But I’m curious—what does it mean for logic to be ‘sensuous’? Is it about the emotional satisfaction of solving a problem, or the elegance of mathematical patterns themselves? Maybe art and math are closer than we think.
NSThang Nguyen Sy
This statement fascinates me because it connects two worlds we often treat as opposites—mathematics and art. Calling math a ‘sensuous logic’ feels almost poetic in itself. I wonder if Schlegel was suggesting that numbers have an aesthetic quality, something beyond pure reasoning. Can mathematical beauty be experienced the same way we experience a piece of music or a poem, through intuition and feeling as much as through intellect?