Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side

Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.

Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side
Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side

Christopher Dawson, the historian of faith and culture, spoke with solemn clarity: “Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side issue in modern life, there exists a strong body of opinion that is actively hostile to Christianity and that regards the destruction of positive religion as absolutely necessary to the advance of modern culture.” In these words lies both a lament and a warning. He saw not only the apathy that relegates religion to the margins, but also the fervor of those who believe that to build a new order, the old foundations of faith must be shattered. His voice is the cry of a guardian watching the ancient temple besieged.

The essence of his message is this: societies cannot dismiss faith without consequence, for every culture is rooted in a vision of the sacred. To cast aside Christianity or any positive religion is not merely to change rituals, but to sever the roots of meaning itself. Dawson warns that when culture seeks to advance by destroying faith, it risks building towers upon sand, magnificent in height but doomed to collapse when storms arise.

History provides vivid testimony to his words. Consider the French Revolution, where the zeal to purge faith led to the desecration of altars, the enthronement of Reason as a goddess, and the suppression of the Church. Yet in tearing down the symbols of belief, the people found not freedom but terror, as the guillotine replaced the cross. Culture advanced in science and politics, but without the anchor of religion, it plunged into chaos. Dawson echoes this eternal truth: destruction of the sacred may promise progress, but often yields emptiness and despair.

Yet his words are not merely caution, but also a call to courage. For he reminds believers that they are not merely defending private rituals, but the very soul of civilization. To uphold positive religion is to uphold the idea that life has meaning, that justice flows from something greater than man, and that culture must be guided by light beyond itself. Without this, human achievements risk becoming idols—brilliant, but hollow.

Let this teaching be handed down: the world may tempt us to treat faith as trivial, or even to scorn it as an obstacle to progress. But Dawson reminds us that every age must decide whether it will build upon the eternal or upon the shifting sands. The struggle between hostility and reverence, between destruction and preservation, is as old as humanity itself. And the wisdom of the ancients is this: when religion dies, culture falters; but when faith and culture walk together, both flourish.

Christopher Dawson
Christopher Dawson

English - Writer October 12, 1889 - May 25, 1970

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment Moreover, behind this vague tendency to treat religion as a side

GGGon Gon

Christopher Dawson’s words make me question how we define cultural progress. If religion is pushed aside, what is lost in the process? Is it possible to progress culturally and socially without fundamentally altering or disregarding religion’s role? How do we balance the need for intellectual and societal growth with the importance of spiritual traditions that have long shaped human history?

Reply.
Information sender

8HNgan 8/2 Huynh

Dawson’s observation about the trend to treat religion as a side issue or even actively undermine it raises concerns about the implications for cultural cohesion. What might happen if religion is completely sidelined in the modern world? Could it lead to a moral vacuum, or are modern systems of thought able to fill this gap? Is religion truly the barrier to cultural advancement or is it misinterpreted as such?

Reply.
Information sender

SDSu Duong

The quote by Dawson seems to suggest that there is an active resistance to Christianity in the advancement of modern culture. But can a society really thrive without any form of spiritual grounding? Is it possible that the conflict between modernity and religion is overblown, or do we risk losing critical moral and ethical frameworks that religious traditions offer?

Reply.
Information sender

LLLinh Linhh

Dawson’s point about hostility toward Christianity in the context of modern culture is thought-provoking. Are we seeing a deliberate attempt to erase religious influences from public life in the name of progress? How do people justify the destruction of positive religion when, for many, faith still serves as a foundational source of meaning, moral guidance, and community strength?

Reply.
Information sender

JLjocasta la

Christopher Dawson's statement brings up an important issue regarding the role of religion in modern culture. Is it true that some view the decline of religion as necessary for cultural progress? How do we reconcile this view with the idea that spirituality and religion have historically contributed to the development of societal values, ethics, and community? Is there a way to embrace modernity without completely sidelining religion?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender