Music, first of all, is completely about abstraction, which is
Music, first of all, is completely about abstraction, which is exactly what architecture is not. In a way, it has been incredibly constructive to know what true abstraction is. So you don't fall into the trap of thinking that what you do is abstract.
Host: The evening had settled into a deep quiet, the room bathed in a gentle light from a lamp in the corner. Outside, the city was alive, but the sounds were muffled by the thick curtains drawn across the windows. Jack sat in his usual spot by the window, his gaze lost in the soft movement of the world outside. Jeeny sat across from him, her sketchbook open, but her attention seemed drawn to the stillness of the room. The moment was pregnant with thought, each of them holding onto their own quiet observations.
Host: Rafael Vinoly’s words floated in the air between them: "Music, first of all, is completely about abstraction, which is exactly what architecture is not. In a way, it has been incredibly constructive to know what true abstraction is. So you don't fall into the trap of thinking that what you do is abstract." The idea of abstraction—something that was so inherent to music but so foreign to architecture—felt like a challenge, a question of boundaries, perspectives, and how we approach creation itself.
Jeeny: Her voice was soft but curious, like a gentle opening door: “What do you think about what Vinoly said? That music is all about abstraction, but architecture is the opposite—grounded, real, tangible. He’s saying that understanding true abstraction in one field can help prevent us from thinking we’re doing something abstract when we’re not. I find that idea fascinating.”
Jack: He took a slow breath, his fingers tapping against the arm of the chair, his mind clearly working through the layers of the thought: “I get what he’s saying. Music is about the intangible, the emotional essence that doesn’t need to be explained. You can’t touch music. It’s felt. Architecture, though—it’s built. It’s meant to serve a purpose, to exist in the real world. You can walk into a building, feel its walls, see its structure. It’s practical in a way that music will never be. But does understanding the abstract nature of music really help in understanding architecture?”
Jeeny: She nodded, her voice thoughtful, but with a spark of something deeper: “I think it does. Because, in a way, it’s a reminder not to mistake form for substance. Architecture, despite being grounded in the physical world, carries a kind of emotional resonance, doesn’t it? A building can evoke a feeling, even if it’s not abstract in the way music is. The structure itself holds meaning, creates atmosphere, and can stir emotions, just like a piece of music. Maybe Vinoly’s point is that while architecture may not be abstract in form, it should never lose its ability to transcend the practical and reach something more invisible—something that can connect with people in a deeper way.”
Host: The room seemed to grow quieter, as if the words Jeeny had spoken had unraveled something inside them both. The world outside, with all its chaos, felt far away in that moment. What they were discussing wasn’t just architecture or music—it was about creation itself, about the boundaries of what is tangible and intangible, and how the two could intersect.
Jack: His voice was now quieter, almost reflective: “So, you’re saying that architecture can’t just be about functionality. It has to reach beyond that, tap into something deeper, something abstract, even if it’s not abstract in the way we traditionally think of it?”
Jeeny: Her gaze softened, her voice steady, as if she were speaking to a truth she had already known for a long time: “Exactly. Architecture is about space, but it’s also about experience. It’s not just about building a structure—it’s about creating an environment that resonates with people on an emotional level. Music is a more obvious form of abstraction, yes, but both music and architecture can exist in the same realm of creating something that speaks to us beyond just the physical.”
Host: There was a quiet shift in the air, as if the very essence of creation was beginning to unfold between them. The conversation had gone from being about the technicalities of architecture and music to something more philosophical. The idea that the two, though seemingly worlds apart, shared a core idea—emotion, feeling, and the importance of connection—was something that felt more profound with each passing word.
Jack: His voice, now quieter, almost reverent, seemed to carry the weight of a realization: “I see now. It’s not about whether it’s abstract or not. It’s about the impact it has. Music is meant to touch the soul directly. Architecture can do that too, if it goes beyond the physical—if it becomes more than just the sum of its parts.”
Jeeny: She smiled softly, her eyes filled with the quiet satisfaction of someone who had shared a new way of seeing the world: “Exactly. When architecture reaches beyond what’s visible, when it connects with the person experiencing it, that’s when it becomes truly meaningful. That’s when it taps into something abstract, something that can’t always be explained, but can always be felt.”
Host: The conversation settled into a peaceful stillness as they both reflected on what had been uncovered. The boundaries between music and architecture, between the abstract and the concrete, no longer seemed so separate. They were both forms of creation, both meant to speak to the soul, to evoke something beyond what could be seen or touched. In that moment, Jack and Jeeny sat together, the weight of their conversation settling gently between them, a shared understanding that transcended the confines of words.
Jack: His voice, now calm, carried the weight of a new perspective: “Maybe it’s not about the form—it’s about the feeling. That’s where the true creativity lies, whether it’s in music, architecture, or anything else.”
Jeeny: She nodded, her voice warm with the understanding they had found together: “Exactly. It’s not just about the structure, it’s about what it makes us feel. That’s the essence of creation.”
Host: The night settled around them, and the world outside continued in its quiet rhythm. Inside, however, the conversation had opened up something deeper—something that spoke to the very nature of creativity itself. Jack and Jeeny sat in the quiet of the room, knowing that sometimes, the most powerful creations were those that transcended the tangible, that reached out and touched something deeper, more abstract, and ultimately more human.
AAdministratorAdministrator
Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon