My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such

My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such

22/09/2025
20/10/2025

My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.

My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such
My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such

Host: The city night was a restless one — all neon hum and taxi horns, all talk and smoke and motion. On the corner of 5th Avenue, the rain had just stopped, leaving the streets slick, the lights doubled in their reflections. Inside a hotel lobby, polished floors gleamed like glass, the faint sound of a piano weaving through the murmur of strangers.

At the far end of the lobby bar, Jack sat with his usual detached composure, his grey eyes half-lidded behind a thin haze of cigarette smoke. Across from him, Jeeny was leaning back in her chair, her hands wrapped around a half-empty glass, her expression alive, curious, challenging — as always.

Host: The bartender wiped the counter with mechanical indifference, and somewhere near the revolving door, two tourists argued about directions. The city was alive, noisy, and unapologetic.

Jeeny: “Fran Lebowitz once said,” she began, tracing the rim of her glass, “‘My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such public areas as restaurants, airports, streets, hotel lobbies, parks, and department stores. Verbal exchanges between consenting adults in private are as of little interest to me as they probably are to them.’

Jack: “Ah,” he said, with a wry smirk. “The gospel according to Fran. Sharp as ever — the only woman who could turn irritation into art.”

Jeeny: “She wasn’t wrong, though,” she said. “There’s a difference between conversation and noise. The world’s gotten too fond of broadcasting every stray thought. Sometimes, silence feels like the last form of good manners.”

Jack: “Or cowardice,” he countered. “You call it manners; I call it restraint born of fear. People are too scared to be wrong, too polite to be interesting.”

Host: The lights flickered softly over their heads, the golden glow turning the air thick and cinematic. A bellhop passed, whistling tunelessly, the faint echo of wheels rolling behind him.

Jeeny: “Interesting?” she repeated, arching a brow. “You think shouting into the public void makes someone interesting? Airports, parks, streets — they’re loud enough without everyone trying to make their echo last.”

Jack: “You can’t smother chaos, Jeeny,” he said. “Freedom of speech is messy by design. That’s the point. The same voices that irritate you are the ones that keep the world from going stale.”

Jeeny: “No, Jack. Some voices don’t keep it alive — they just drown it.”

Host: Her tone sharpened, and the rain outside began again, softly drumming against the glass. The piano player in the corner shifted to a slower tune, as though the night itself was eavesdropping.

Jack: “You sound like an aristocrat of conversation,” he said, leaning closer. “Wanting to curate discourse like a gallery wall.”

Jeeny: “I just think public spaces deserve dignity,” she replied. “Every dinner, every airport terminal — everyone shouting opinions, recording themselves, demanding to be heard. It’s exhausting. Lebowitz wasn’t trying to silence the world, Jack — she was trying to civilize it.”

Jack: “Civilize it?” He laughed. “You can’t civilize democracy, Jeeny. The right to speak means the right to annoy. The right to offend. The right to make noise. That’s the deal.”

Jeeny: “And the right to think before you speak?”

Jack: “Optional,” he said dryly.

Host: The bartender chuckled quietly, pretending not to listen, but clearly entertained. Outside, a car horn wailed; inside, a glass clinked.

Jeeny: “You defend chaos like it’s noble,” she said. “But freedom without discernment isn’t democracy — it’s disorder. Lebowitz was pointing out that not everything deserves an audience.”

Jack: “And yet, she said it in public. On television, in essays, in interviews. The irony’s delicious, don’t you think?”

Jeeny: “She wasn’t trying to be silent,” Jeeny said. “She was trying to restore proportion — to remind people that public speech should serve thought, not vanity.”

Host: Jack leaned back, his jaw tightening, his eyes narrowing with amusement.

Jack: “You know, Jeeny, I think that’s what bothers me about that argument. It assumes people need to be worthy of expression. Who decides that? You? Fran? The ones who speak prettiest?”

Jeeny: “No,” she said calmly. “The ones who listen.”

Jack: “Listen?” he scoffed. “Listening’s a lost art. People don’t want silence anymore — they want confirmation. Even you.”

Jeeny: “You’re wrong,” she said, her voice quieter now. “I don’t want confirmation. I want clarity. There’s a difference.”

Host: The rain picked up, streaking down the windows, turning the world outside into a watercolor of blurred lights and motion. Inside, the air between them grew denser — not angry, but alive with tension, like static before lightning.

Jack: “You think the world needs fewer voices?” he asked.

Jeeny: “No. Just better ones. Or quieter ones. We’ve mistaken volume for truth. Lebowitz wasn’t calling for censorship — she was calling for taste.”

Jack: “Taste is just privilege with better vocabulary.”

Jeeny: “Maybe,” she admitted. “But without it, everything turns to noise.”

Host: Her words settled in the air like cigarette smoke — slow, curling, inescapable. Jack didn’t reply at once. He looked out toward the rain, his reflection warped in the glass.

Jack: “When I was young,” he said finally, “I thought speaking my mind was bravery. I said whatever I wanted, wherever I wanted. And one day, I watched my words break someone I loved. That’s when I realized — freedom isn’t measured by what you can say. It’s measured by what you choose not to.”

Jeeny: “So you agree with her.”

Jack: “No,” he said. “I just understand her.”

Host: The piano player hit a minor key, and for a brief moment, the lobby’s noise folded into harmony — footsteps, whispers, laughter, rain.

Jeeny: “Maybe that’s all she wanted,” she said. “Understanding, not agreement. The sense that we owe each other a little silence in the public square.”

Jack: “A little silence,” he repeated. “In this city? You’d have better luck teaching pigeons philosophy.”

Jeeny: “Maybe that’s why she made sarcasm her art form. It’s the only language noise can understand.”

Host: Jack laughed softly — a real laugh, weary but warm. He stubbed out his cigarette, the ember glowing one last time before dying.

Jack: “So, what’s your rule, then?” he asked. “When to speak and when to shut up?”

Jeeny: “When words add warmth — speak. When they add weight — stop.”

Jack: “Simple enough.”

Jeeny: “Rarely practiced.”

Host: They sat there a moment longer, letting the city breathe around them — the hum of conversation, the rain’s rhythm, the pianist’s slow grace. It was the kind of silence that didn’t demand — it invited.

Jeeny: “You know,” she said finally, “Fran would’ve hated us right now. Two people talking philosophy in a hotel lobby.”

Jack: “Then we’ll dedicate it to her.”

Jeeny: “As long as we don’t post it online.”

Jack: “Deal.”

Host: The rain lightened, the streets below glimmering like rivers of light. The world, for all its noise, seemed briefly at peace.

And as they finished their drinks in the soft hum of the lobby, something about the night — the rain, the laughter, the restraint — began to sound almost symphonic.

Host: Because perhaps Fran was right after all:
It isn’t speech that defines civilization — it’s the spaces between it.
The silences that remind us that listening, too, is a form of freedom.

Fran Lebowitz
Fran Lebowitz

American - Journalist Born: October 27, 1950

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment My desire to curtail undue freedom of speech extends only to such

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender