My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if

My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if

22/09/2025
20/10/2025

My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.

My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if
My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if

The words of Saul Alinsky—“My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if people have the opportunity to act freely and the power to control their own destinies, they'll generally reach the right decisions.”—stand as both a declaration of faith and a challenge to the ages. In them, he affirms that the foundation of all lasting progress is not in kings, nor in elites, nor in the commands of distant rulers, but in the collective wisdom of ordinary people. For Alinsky, the true wellspring of justice flows not from decrees, but from the moment when men and women are entrusted with their own destinies and act from freedom rather than fear.

The origin of this conviction lies in Alinsky’s life as a community organizer in the neighborhoods of Chicago. He saw firsthand the despair of the poor, the neglected, and the voiceless. Yet he also saw their resilience, their ingenuity, and their strength when given the chance to unite. Out of these experiences grew his fixed truth: that people, when trusted with power, can and will shape a better destiny than any imposed upon them from above. His words stand as a rebuke to the arrogance of those who imagine that wisdom belongs only to the few.

History confirms his vision. Consider the American Revolution. The mightiest empire of the age believed that common colonists could not govern themselves, that they required the guiding hand of distant kings and parliaments. Yet when the people rose, declaring their right to act freely and control their own future, they birthed a nation that became a beacon of liberty. Their decisions were not perfect, their path not without flaw, yet the act of self-rule itself unleashed creativity, innovation, and endurance beyond the imagination of their rulers.

So too in India, when Mahatma Gandhi called upon millions of ordinary men and women to resist the British Raj. Skeptics doubted the capacity of the masses; they expected chaos or failure. Yet when people were given the dignity of action—marching to the sea for salt, spinning their own cloth, standing firm without violence—they proved that freedom’s wisdom dwells not in palaces, but in the villages and fields of the nation. Their decisions, though simple, were powerful, and they broke the grip of empire.

Alinsky’s words also carry a warning. For if people are denied the opportunity to act freely, if they are silenced, manipulated, or bound by fear, then even their best intentions may falter. Freedom is the soil in which right action grows; without it, corruption festers. Tyrants and oppressors often justify their domination by claiming that the masses cannot govern themselves, that they must be guided. But Alinsky turns this claim upside down: it is precisely when people are given control over their destinies that the soundest decisions emerge.

The lesson for us is clear: trust in the wisdom of the many, and work to ensure that all have both freedom and power. Do not imagine that the great decisions of life and society must always be left to the experts or the powerful few. Remember that truth is revealed not only in the halls of authority, but in the lived experience of the people. And if their voices are heard, if their hands are free, if their dignity is honored, they will rise to meet the challenge of history.

Therefore, take these actions: listen to those whose voices are often ignored. Share power rather than hoard it. Build communities where decisions are made together, and trust that the collective will, when free of chains, will bend toward justice. In your own life, honor the choices of others, and give space for their freedom, just as you claim your own. For as Alinsky has shown, the only fixed truth worth clinging to is faith in people themselves—and in their capacity, when free, to find the path of wisdom.

Saul Alinsky
Saul Alinsky

American - Activist January 30, 1909 - June 12, 1972

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment My only fixed truth is a belief in people: a conviction that if

TULe Thi Thu Uyen

Alinsky's view on people's potential for making the right decisions through freedom is thought-provoking. However, how do we define 'right decisions'? Is it based on personal happiness, societal good, or something else? This belief in people's autonomy feels empowering, but it also seems to overlook the complexities of human nature, where not all decisions are made from a place of reason or understanding.

Reply.
Information sender

NBNgtrmy Bbi

I agree with Alinsky’s perspective to some extent, but I feel like this belief in people assumes a certain level of wisdom and fairness in individuals. What if people use their freedom to make decisions that benefit only themselves or a select group? Does this idea of self-determination work in practice for everyone, or do some people need more support in making the right choices?

Reply.
Information sender

TNY Vo Thi Nhu

I appreciate Alinsky's optimism, but it seems a little idealistic. People are often influenced by emotions, biases, and external pressures. If everyone acted freely without any limits or guidance, would the decisions they make always be in the best interest of society? Would it be enough to trust people to make the right choices, or is there a role for structure and leadership?

Reply.
Information sender

HTHien Tran

This quote makes me wonder if the right decision always leads to the best outcome for everyone. People do make mistakes, and sometimes the freedom to act freely can lead to unintended consequences. Does this mean that people should have absolute control over their destinies, or should there be some sort of guidance to help steer those decisions in the right direction?

Reply.
Information sender

MHPham Minh Hai

Alinsky’s belief that people, when given the freedom and power to make their own choices, will usually reach the right decisions is optimistic, but it raises some important questions. Can we truly trust people to always make the right decisions? Are there situations where the collective good might require sacrifices or decisions that individuals might not make on their own?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender