Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands

Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands

22/09/2025
03/11/2025

Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?

Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferiour to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands
Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands

Host: The night was heavy with fog, the kind that makes every lamp look like it’s drowning in its own light. The street outside the harbor tavern was nearly empty, except for the distant shapes of dockworkers heading home. Inside, the air was thick with salt, smoke, and the faint echo of an old piano tune that refused to die.

At a corner table, beneath the slow sway of a broken bulb, Jack and Jeeny sat opposite each other. Between them, two half-filled glasses of whiskey caught the flickering light like captured embers.

Jack’s coat was still damp from the mist, his grey eyes unreadable. Jeeny’s hands rested around her glass, her fingers trembling slightly, not from cold, but from something that had lived in her heart too long.

Host: The quote had been spoken by Jeeny — quietly, yet with the kind of force that made even the silence afterward feel alive: “Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands, goods, or houses, among possessions. It is necessary that all property should be inferior to its possessor. But how does the slave differ from his master, but by chance?”

Jack: (leaning back, voice low) “Chance, huh? That’s an old comfort. Makes inequality sound like a lottery instead of a system.”

Jeeny: (raising her eyes) “You think it’s just chance that divides them, Jack? That the slave and the master are born into roles written by some invisible law of the world?”

Host: Her voice trembled with restrained anger, yet her gaze stayed soft — like someone trying to understand rather than accuse.

Jack: “I think it’s not chance, Jeeny. It’s structure. Power, wealth, history — they make the world what it is. Men didn’t wake up one morning and decide to be masters. They built systems. And they keep them alive.”

Jeeny: “But that’s exactly the horror Clarkson meant. To build a world where one man can own another and then call it order. You’re defending the machine that eats its own builders.”

Host: The wind rattled the windows, and the light flickered. Jack looked toward the harbor, where ships floated in the mist like forgotten ghosts.

Jack: “I’m not defending it. I’m describing it. Every civilization’s been built on some form of ownership. Look at Rome, or the industrial age, or even now — people still sell their time, their labor, their freedom, just to survive. We changed the word, not the meaning.”

Jeeny: “Then you believe every man is still a slave, only this time with a prettier collar.”

Jack: (smirking) “You said it, not me. Maybe Clarkson was right, but he lived in a time where you could still point at the chains. Now the chains are invisible — contracts, debts, salaries, dependency. It’s all the same bargain.”

Host: A pause settled between them. The piano outside stopped. The sound of the sea pressed against the tavern walls — a low, eternal heartbeat of the earth.

Jeeny: “You sound like you’ve given up on the idea that men can ever be equal.”

Jack: “Because equality’s a dream, not a state. Look at the history books — every time someone tries to level the world, it ends in chaos. The French Revolution burned through ideals faster than torches through paper. Power just changed hands — new masters, new slaves.”

Jeeny: “Yet that’s no reason to stop fighting. Without those revolutions, we’d still be living under kings who believed their blood was divine. Every step forward was written by those who refused to accept the hierarchy as natural.”

Host: Jeeny’s eyes glowed with the kind of light that only conviction gives. She leaned forward, her voice soft but sharp, like steel hidden under velvet.

Jeeny: “Don’t you see, Jack? Clarkson wasn’t talking about ownership in the legal sense. He meant something deeper — that no human soul can belong to another. That even when the world pretends it can measure people like property, the soul remains free.”

Jack: “That’s beautiful, Jeeny. But try telling that to a man who’s starving in a factory or to a migrant working fifteen hours a day. His soul may be free, but his life isn’t.”

Jeeny: “Then you’re saying freedom doesn’t exist at all.”

Jack: “I’m saying it’s a story we tell ourselves to sleep better at night.”

Host: Jack’s hands tightened around his glass, his knuckles white. Jeeny’s breath quickened; the flame of her belief burned brighter in the dim light.

Jeeny: “That’s cruel. Even cynical for you. If freedom’s just a story, then what’s the point of living?”

Jack: “To endure. To survive long enough to make sense of the absurdity.”

Host: For a moment, their eyes locked — one filled with defiance, the other with quiet despair. The air between them felt charged, like a storm waiting to break.

Jeeny: “Clarkson fought against slavery when it was considered normal, Jack. He faced ridicule, danger, exile. And he did it because he believed no accident of birth or circumstance can make one life worth less than another. Tell me — where’s your line? When does endurance become complicity?”

Jack: (voice roughening) “When you have something left to lose. It’s easy to talk about ideals when you’re not the one on the edge.”

Jeeny: “And yet it’s the people on the edge who’ve always changed the world.”

Host: The lamp flickered again, throwing brief shadows across Jack’s face. For a second, he looked older — not by years, but by memories. The kind that carry both guilt and exhaustion.

Jack: (quieter) “You think I don’t know what it’s like to feel owned? To sell your time, your mind, just to stay alive? We all wear our chains differently.”

Jeeny: “Then why not break them?”

Jack: “Because breaking them means breaking everything — order, comfort, security. And maybe people don’t really want freedom. Maybe they just want safety dressed as choice.”

Jeeny: (shaking her head) “No, Jack. People want dignity. Even when they can’t define it. They want to believe their life belongs to them — not to a company, a government, a master, or even fate.”

Host: Her voice softened, the anger now dissolving into sadness. Jack looked down, his reflection rippling in the amber whiskey.

Jack: “You sound like you still have faith in humanity.”

Jeeny: “Maybe I do. Because every time someone chooses to act against injustice, no matter how small — that’s proof enough. When a worker stands up for another, when a stranger gives bread to the hungry — that’s freedom. That’s defiance.”

Host: Outside, the fog began to thin, and the harbor lights shone clearer. The air carried a faint hint of dawn.

Jack: “You think compassion is enough to rebuild the world?”

Jeeny: “It’s the only thing that ever has.”

Host: The tension eased. The storm between them had passed, leaving behind the quiet truth of shared understanding. Jack leaned forward, his voice low, almost tender.

Jack: “Maybe chance does separate us — the master, the slave, the rich, the poor. But maybe what matters is how we respond to that chance. Whether we become tyrants or healers.”

Jeeny: (smiling faintly) “Then perhaps we agree more than we thought.”

Host: The first light of morning slipped through the window, painting their faces in pale gold. The world outside stirred awake, but for a moment, inside the tavern, there was only silence — the kind that follows revelation.

Jeeny: “Maybe the difference between master and slave was never chance, Jack. Maybe it was conscience.”

Jack: (after a pause) “And maybe that’s the one thing we still own.”

Host: The sun rose higher, scattering the fog, and the sea glistened like a field of molten silver. Jack and Jeeny sat quietly, their glasses empty, but their hearts heavy with something richer than whiskey — the fragile, enduring belief that even in a world built on possession, the human spirit remains unclaimed.

Thomas Clarkson
Thomas Clarkson

English - Activist March 28, 1760 - September 26, 1846

Have 0 Comment Neither can men, by the same principles, be considered as lands

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender