Not everyone can be successful selling fashion at $25,000 for a
Not everyone can be successful selling fashion at $25,000 for a wedding outfit. Certain designers are able to do that. And there is only a certain amount of consumers who can do that. The real opportunity is in that $25 garment.
The words of Imran Amed—“Not everyone can be successful selling fashion at $25,000 for a wedding outfit. Certain designers are able to do that. And there is only a certain amount of consumers who can do that. The real opportunity is in that $25 garment.”—shine like a lamp for those blinded by the dazzle of excess. He reminds us that though the world marvels at the grandeur of a wedding outfit stitched in jewels and silk, true power lies not in serving the few who can reach such heights, but in creating beauty and dignity for the many. For the masses will not live in castles, yet they too deserve garments that carry grace.
The vision he offers is one of humility and wisdom. The $25,000 gown is a monument to aspiration, but it is fleeting and rare. The $25 garment, though simple, has the power to clothe multitudes, to shape daily lives, and to bring joy within reach of ordinary souls. Thus, the opportunity Amed points to is not in the isolated splendor of luxury, but in the shared abundance of accessibility. Greatness is not found in exclusivity, but in service to the many.
History recalls the example of Mahatma Gandhi, who spun his own khadi cloth as both symbol and practice. He rejected the imported luxuries of empire and lifted up the humble garment of the people as an emblem of strength and independence. Though plain compared to the robes of kings, the khadi carried more power than silk, for it was woven into the hearts of millions. So too does Amed’s wisdom point us toward a fashion that empowers rather than excludes, a beauty available to all.
The contrast between designer exclusivity and mass opportunity is not merely about commerce—it is about justice. When beauty is reserved only for the wealthy, it becomes a weapon of division, deepening the chasm between rich and poor. But when beauty enters the lives of the many, it elevates, it inspires, it affirms dignity. The simple garment, worn by workers, students, mothers, and children, carries the weight of shared humanity far more than the jeweled gown displayed once beneath chandeliers.
Therefore, O listener, take this lesson: the worth of creation is not measured by its price but by its reach. To serve the few may bring glory, but to serve the many brings legacy. The real opportunity in life is not to dazzle kings but to uplift the common heart. For just as the humblest seed can feed nations while the rarest fruit feeds only a king, so too can the $25 garment shape the destiny of more lives than the most elaborate gown. In this truth lies the nobility of creation.
TANguyen Tu Anh
I find this quote quite thought-provoking, especially in the context of how consumer behavior has evolved. In a world where everyone is trying to get 'luxury' at a fraction of the cost, is there still a market for those $25 garments? It also makes me question the psychology behind fashion purchasing. Do people still equate a higher price tag with better quality, or is there a shift towards practicality and value? I would love to hear how others see the future of accessible fashion.
MSnguyen minh son
This idea of focusing on the lower price points makes me think about how fashion has democratized over the years. Everyone can wear something fashionable now, regardless of their budget. But at what cost? I do appreciate the notion that the real opportunity could lie in making quality fashion accessible to more people, but what about the impact on the workers who make those clothes? Can we truly have affordable fashion without compromising on fair wages and working conditions?
MHHuynh Thi My Huyen
I get the point about the $25 garment being where the real opportunity lies, but I can't help but wonder if that's sustainable in the long run. Can fashion at that price really be profitable without cutting corners? Plus, we know the fast-fashion industry has significant environmental consequences. Shouldn't the fashion industry rethink how it balances affordability with ethical production? Maybe the future of fashion lies in more conscious consumerism and more responsible pricing.
NANhung Alice
This quote highlights the sharp divide between luxury and mass-market fashion. I feel like it's true that high-end designs often cater to the wealthy elite, but there's so much potential in tapping into the lower price range. The challenge is maintaining quality while keeping costs low. Is it even possible to strike that balance, or does cheaper fashion often sacrifice quality? Maybe this is where innovation in fabric or manufacturing can make a difference.
0AV3012 09-Ngoc Anh
It's interesting how Imran Amed brings up the exclusivity of high-end fashion and how it caters to a niche market. But I wonder, in today's market with increasing access to global fashion, is there still room for such luxury brands to thrive? Or is the real opportunity in making fashion more affordable and accessible for a larger audience? The idea of the $25 garment is appealing, especially as consumer behavior shifts towards more sustainable and affordable choices.