Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep

Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep

22/09/2025
18/10/2025

Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.

Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it's the home of the extraordinary, the only home.
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep
Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep

Hear, O seekers of meaning, the words of Philip Levine: “Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep writing about the ordinary because for me it’s the home of the extraordinary, the only home.” In this confession, the poet speaks with both humility and reverence. He admits that poetry cannot halt the tides of time, cannot rescue all from forgetting, cannot stop the march of death. Yet he still writes, for he has found that the ordinary, the plain fabric of daily life, is the dwelling place of wonder, of revelation, of the eternal disguised in humble clothes.

The origin of this wisdom lies in Levine’s life itself. Born in Detroit, he labored in factories, breathing smoke, handling metal, enduring the grind of labor. He saw firsthand the lives of workers—men and women whose names history would not record, whose stories might vanish into silence. And yet, in their faces, in their toil, in their endurance, he found sparks of the extraordinary. He wrote poems not of kings and generals, but of machinists and mothers, of lunch breaks and long nights, of sweat and stubbornness. In this way, he became the voice of the unseen, discovering the sacred hidden in the common.

History offers us another example in William Blake, who wandered the streets of London and declared that he could see heaven in a wildflower and eternity in a grain of sand. Like Levine, Blake knew that the ordinary is not to be despised. The small, the overlooked, the familiar—these are the vessels of mystery. Greatness is not always found in monuments and victories; often it hides in kitchens, alleys, fields, and factories. To look upon these with reverence is the task of the poet, and Levine took it as his life’s mission.

Levine’s statement that poetry “will save nothing from oblivion” is not despair but honesty. Time swallows all—empires crumble, names fade, works of art are forgotten. Yet poetry’s gift is not immortality but revelation in the moment. A poem may not rescue a life from being forgotten by history, but it can honor that life, bear witness to its truth, and in doing so, give meaning to the present. This is why Levine continued: not to defy oblivion, but to celebrate the fleeting, to say, “This moment mattered, this person mattered, this ordinary life shone.”

There is a heroic humility in this vision. Some poets chase immortality, seeking to carve their names into eternity. Levine sought instead to listen. He understood that greatness is not something distant, but something near at hand—hidden in the laugh of a child, in the rhythm of a machine, in the weary walk home at sunset. His poetry teaches us that the extraordinary is not rare, but everywhere, waiting for eyes that can see and words that can honor it.

The lesson, then, is clear: do not wait for glory to find beauty. Do not think that only the monumental or the celebrated deserve your attention. The ordinary life, the unnoticed moment, the small kindness, the daily struggle—these are the true treasures. Poetry may not conquer oblivion, but it can awaken you to the eternity hidden in each passing day. The act of noticing, of naming, of honoring the simple, is itself a victory against meaninglessness.

In practice, let us act. Keep a journal, not only of grand events, but of daily sights: the sound of rain on the roof, the smile of a stranger, the taste of bread. Write verses not only of stars and battles, but of kitchens and sidewalks. Read the poets who honor the humble, and let their vision train your eyes. Most of all, live attentive to the ordinary, for in it you will find the extraordinary—and though oblivion may come, your days will not have been lived in blindness.

Thus Levine’s teaching endures: poetry cannot save the world from oblivion, but it can save us from indifference. It can teach us to see, to honor, to love the ordinary as the only home of the extraordinary. If you embrace this vision, your life itself will become a poem—not eternal in time, but eternal in depth, alive to the wonder of the present moment.

Philip Levine
Philip Levine

American - Poet January 10, 1928 - February 14, 2015

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment Now I think poetry will save nothing from oblivion, but I keep

CHcong hau

I’m fascinated by the juxtaposition of oblivion and the extraordinary in Levine’s statement. How does acknowledging poetry’s limitations enhance its significance? It seems that the act of writing becomes a meditation on ordinary life, making readers reconsider what is remarkable in their own experiences. I also wonder whether this philosophy encourages a particular kind of attention to detail, empathy, or aesthetic sensitivity. Could Levine’s approach inspire others to see their everyday world as a repository of meaning, prompting reflection, appreciation, and perhaps even a shift in perspective on what truly matters?

Reply.
Information sender

LABui lan anh

Levine’s acceptance that poetry won’t preserve everything challenges traditional notions of art as immortalizing human experience. It makes me think about the role of poetry: is it a record, a reflection, or an act of personal discovery? I also question how this perspective shapes his voice and style—is it more grounded, intimate, and observational? By finding the extraordinary within the ordinary, Levine seems to elevate everyday life, suggesting that the true value of poetry may lie in its ability to uncover hidden dimensions and emotional depth, rather than in achieving historical or cultural permanence.

Reply.
Information sender

NCNguyen Ngoc Chau

This quote raises questions about the nature of the extraordinary. How does Levine define it, and why does he locate it within ordinary experiences? Could it be that our attention and interpretation transform the mundane into something exceptional? I also wonder how this philosophy influences his imagery, language, and choice of subjects in poetry. Does it encourage readers to slow down, observe more carefully, and find beauty in their own surroundings? His approach seems to advocate for mindfulness and a deeper connection to daily life as a source of inspiration.

Reply.
Information sender

TTThoa Trieu

Levine’s words evoke a sense of quiet defiance. Even if poetry cannot save from oblivion, he persists in writing, suggesting that the act itself has value. I wonder whether this viewpoint reflects a broader philosophy of life—that meaning exists in our engagement with ordinary moments rather than in lasting legacy. How might this influence the tone, subject matter, and accessibility of his poetry? It also prompts reflection on whether contemporary poets feel pressured to achieve immortality through their work, or whether focusing on the ordinary can be equally, if not more, rewarding.

Reply.
Information sender

TMNguyen Truong Minh

I’m intrigued by the idea that the ordinary is a ‘home of the extraordinary.’ Does this mean that Levine sees poetry as a lens for revealing hidden beauty, rather than a tool for recording history or achieving immortality? It also makes me question how readers engage with such work: do we appreciate poetry most when it illuminates our everyday surroundings in ways we hadn’t noticed? This approach seems both humble and profound, emphasizing connection, empathy, and awareness over grandiose ambitions or societal impact.

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender