Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't

Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't

22/09/2025
20/10/2025

Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?

Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't
Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't

Hear the radiant words of Guru Nanak, the first teacher of the Sikhs, who spoke beyond dogma and division: “Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don’t understand truth, nor do they meditate on it. Who can define what is meat and what is plant? Who knows where the sin lies, being a vegetarian or a non-vegetarian?” In this teaching lies a timeless call to wisdom: the true path is not found in endless quarrels about the outward forms of life, but in the inward quest for truth. Men and women waste their breath in disputes, but the enlightened one asks not what enters the mouth, but what dwells in the heart.

The ancients knew that false arguments often divide where unity should reign. In many lands, sects rose against one another over rituals, diets, and customs, as if these outward matters could guarantee spiritual purity. Yet Nanak warns: such debates are the pursuits of the fool, for they distract from the essence of spiritual life. To call one practice holy and another sinful without deeper reflection is to mistake the shadow for the flame, the outer husk for the seed within. Meditation on truth—that is the true food of the soul.

Consider the life of the Buddha. In his day, ascetics starved themselves, believing that holiness lay in rejecting all pleasures of the body. Others indulged in excess, worshipping desire as their guide. The Buddha, walking the Middle Way, declared that neither starvation nor indulgence leads to enlightenment. So too does Guru Nanak point out that the dispute over meat or plant, over vegetarian or non-vegetarian, is but another form of missing the path. True spirituality does not reside in the plate, but in the purity of mind and the compassion of action.

The origin of these words is found in the debates of Nanak’s time. India, a land of diverse religions, was filled with arguments over dietary laws—some declaring meat impure, others defending its use. Nanak, the mystic of oneness, shattered both sides with his question: Who can even define what is meat and what is plant? For is not life present in both? Is not one being consumed for the sake of another in all forms of sustenance? The cycle of existence itself blurs these categories. Thus, he revealed that the higher question is not what we eat, but how we live.

This teaching carries a deep lesson for us today. In our world, too, we quarrel endlessly over appearances—over labels, customs, ideologies. We divide ourselves into camps, each proclaiming superiority, while neglecting the deeper quest: to know truth, to cultivate compassion, to live in harmony with the divine. Guru Nanak teaches us to rise above these arguments, to see that spiritual wisdom is not about outward distinctions, but about inner sincerity and reverence for life.

The lesson is clear: let us not waste our energy condemning or defending diets, customs, or rituals, while ignoring the essence of the spirit. Instead, let us focus on the substance: Do we live with kindness? Do we meditate on truth? Do we treat others with justice and compassion? These are the questions that define the soul’s purity. For outward acts may differ, but inward sincerity unites all seekers.

Practical steps follow. If you choose to eat meat, do so with mindfulness, gratitude, and restraint. If you choose vegetarianism, do so with humility, not with pride. Do not condemn others for their choices, but seek to purify your own heart. Above all, meditate on truth daily—through prayer, reflection, and compassionate action. Let your life itself become an offering, richer than any diet or ritual.

Thus Guru Nanak’s words endure like a lamp in the fog: fools argue over meat, but the wise seek truth. The question is not what lies upon your plate, but what lies within your heart. To be pure is not to eat this or that, but to live in love, to walk in truth, and to honor the divine in every breath. This is the path of the wise, the path that leads not to division, but to eternal unity.

Guru Nanak
Guru Nanak

Philosopher April 15, 1469 - September 22, 1539

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment Only fools argue whether to eat meat or not. They don't

DVDat Vu

Guru Nanak seems to imply that debates over vegetarianism versus meat-eating are distractions from more important spiritual matters. But I still wonder about the ethical implications of each choice. Can a diet based on compassion and respect for all living beings lead to a deeper connection with truth, or is this perspective too narrow? It’s a complex issue—should we think more about the nature of our actions rather than categorizing them?

Reply.
Information sender

NTnguyen tran

This thought-provoking quote suggests that focusing on whether to eat meat or not misses the bigger truth. I wonder, though, if this applies to all aspects of life. Are there other areas where we become overly focused on trivial arguments and fail to see the larger spiritual truths? Can understanding truth in such a way help us address more complex issues in society without getting caught up in divisions?

Reply.
Information sender

CNThanh Chi Nguyen

Guru Nanak's quote makes me reflect on the deeper nature of truth and its complexity. It challenges the rigidity of labels like ‘vegetarian’ or ‘non-vegetarian’ and encourages us to think beyond these classifications. But can this approach truly help us resolve the moral and ethical dilemmas that food choices bring? Is it possible to embrace the bigger picture without acknowledging the impact our food choices have on the world around us?

Reply.
Information sender

PTTruong Thi Phuong Thao

This quote seems to suggest that arguing about dietary choices is a superficial debate. But does that mean we should dismiss the ethical concerns about eating meat or plant-based diets altogether? Where does personal responsibility fit into this? If we can’t define what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ in the context of food, should we still reflect on the consequences of our choices on the environment or animals?

Reply.
Information sender

THThu Huynh

Guru Nanak’s words challenge the dichotomy between being vegetarian or non-vegetarian, suggesting that such arguments miss the deeper truth. It makes me think: is the focus on what we eat often a distraction from larger questions of compassion, spirituality, and truth? Perhaps the real issue lies not in the food we consume but in how we live and treat others. What is truly at the heart of the matter?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender