Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my

Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my

22/09/2025
09/10/2025

Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.

Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my
Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my

The words of Terence Stamp—“Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my career. He was real and he bore witness to it. The things he said to you, he lived them.”—resound like a testimony of discipleship, the remembrance of one soul lifted by another’s example. They tell us that the greatest teachers are not those whose words glitter with cleverness, but those whose lives embody their counsel. To be a positive influence is not to charm, nor to flatter, but to stand as a living witness of one’s truth.

The origin of this wisdom lies deep in the human heart. From the dawn of civilization, the elders who shaped generations were not merely speakers, but doers. In the schools of Athens, young men gathered not just to hear Socrates, but to see how he lived—how he questioned, how he stood before trial, how he accepted death rather than betray his principles. His life was his greatest lesson. So too, Stamp recalls Ustinov not for theatrical brilliance alone, but for being real, for embodying the very truths he imparted.

Consider the story of Mahatma Gandhi. He spoke of nonviolence, of truth, of simplicity. But his greatness lay not in his words alone; it lay in the fact that he spun his own cloth, fasted for peace, and chose poverty over comfort. His followers knew that “the things he said, he lived them.” That authenticity made him unbreakable, a man whose influence spread across continents. His life bears the same lesson that Stamp drew from Ustinov: true leadership is lived, not declared.

We may also recall Florence Nightingale, who was not only a reformer in words but in action. When she urged others to tend to the sick with compassion and cleanliness, she herself walked the wards at night, lamp in hand, caring for the wounded. Her presence bore witness to her teaching, and so she inspired a generation of nurses. Had she spoken without living her truth, her influence would have been forgotten. But because she embodied her words, her light still shines across centuries.

The meaning of Stamp’s reflection is clear: the greatest influence upon us comes not from those who advise from afar, but from those who stand close, living examples of the ideals they proclaim. Words may stir for a moment, but lives lived with integrity transform forever. To be real, to align word and deed, is the surest path to leaving a legacy of good.

Practical wisdom calls us to act in the same way. Do not tell your children honesty is important unless you yourself are honest. Do not tell your friends to be brave if you shrink from truth. Do not counsel others to endure hardship if you flee from your own trials. Instead, let your life be your teaching. Even the smallest consistency between what you say and what you do becomes a beacon to those around you.

Thus, let Terence Stamp’s remembrance of Peter Ustinov be carried as eternal counsel: to be a positive influence is not to speak much, but to live well. To be real is to let no gap lie between your words and your actions. To bear witness is to show others, through your life, that what you believe is possible. And when you live in this way, your influence will echo across generations, for it will not be tied to words that fade, but to deeds that endure.

Terence Stamp
Terence Stamp

British - Actor Born: July 22, 1939

Have 5 Comment Peter Ustinov was the first really positive influence in my

CCChi Chi

I really admire the idea that a person’s actions are what give weight to their words. Peter Ustinov’s approach to life seems like a rare quality, where what he taught others wasn’t just theory but something lived. How often do we come across people like this in our own lives? Does having a role model like Ustinov raise the bar for what we expect from those we look up to?

Reply.
Information sender

CM10CT2-24- Tran Ngoc Chuc My

Terence Stamp’s words about Peter Ustinov being a true influence resonate deeply. It’s fascinating that Ustinov’s authenticity was a guiding light in Stamp’s career. Do you think being 'real' and living by your values is something all successful people should aspire to? Or is it okay for mentors and role models to be more about ideals rather than practices?

Reply.
Information sender

PNLe tran phuong Nhi

This quote speaks to the importance of authenticity in leadership. Peter Ustinov wasn’t just a figure giving advice; he embodied it. In a world full of influencers who may not always practice what they preach, this makes me wonder—how important is it for those who mentor or inspire to truly walk the walk? Can people still be effective without this level of integrity?

Reply.
Information sender

THTran Huynh

It’s inspiring to hear about Peter Ustinov's impact on Terence Stamp’s career. There’s something deeply powerful about role models who lead by example rather than just offering advice. But I wonder—how often do we meet people who live their principles so openly? Could this kind of integrity be the reason Ustinov was so influential to Terence Stamp, or is it just a rare personality trait?

Reply.
Information sender

HPHoang Phong

I find it powerful that Terence Stamp highlights Peter Ustinov as a role model who didn’t just speak positivity but truly lived it. This makes me wonder—how often do we see figures who not only preach but also practice what they say? Is it rare for influential people to be so genuine, or are we just too quick to overlook the authenticity behind their words?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender