Poetry is a natural energy resource of our country. It has no
Poetry is a natural energy resource of our country. It has no energy crisis, possessing a potential that will last as long as the country. Its power is equal to that of any country in the world.
Hear the stirring words of Richard Eberhart, the American poet of vision, who proclaimed: “Poetry is a natural energy resource of our country. It has no energy crisis, possessing a potential that will last as long as the country. Its power is equal to that of any country in the world.” In this bold declaration, Eberhart elevates poetry beyond art, beyond entertainment, and names it as a force equal to the engines of industry or the armaments of war. He declares that a nation’s true wealth is not only in its oil, its steel, or its armies, but in the inexhaustible well of spirit, imagination, and language.
The meaning is heroic: unlike coal, oil, or gas, which deplete with use, poetry is a resource that grows the more it is shared. The more a nation sings, writes, and speaks, the richer it becomes in soul. No embargo can choke it, no scarcity can starve it. Its fuel is human experience—sorrow, joy, hope, despair—and as long as life endures, poetry will endure. In this sense, Eberhart reminds us that the deepest strength of a people is not measured in factories or armies, but in their ability to tell their story, to shape meaning, to inspire through the power of words.
History itself confirms this truth. When Greece was small in territory and resources, it still gave the world Homer, Sophocles, and Sappho. These voices outlasted empires, carrying Greek culture across millennia. Rome conquered lands, but it is through Virgil and Horace that its spirit continues to breathe. In modern times, nations devastated by war—Poland, Ireland, Vietnam—kept their flame alive through poets who gave voice to suffering and hope. In every case, the power of poetry proved greater than the power of armies, for it outlasted destruction and carried identity through the ages.
Eberhart spoke as one who lived through wars and upheaval. He saw that a nation could face scarcity of oil, or hunger for resources, but never need suffer an “energy crisis” in the realm of poetry. For so long as people live and breathe, they carry within them stories, rhythms, and visions. This inexhaustible energy not only sustains the spirit of a people but also projects their voice to the world. Thus he declares that American poetry has a power equal to any country in the world—not because of wealth, but because of the boundless resource of its imagination.
The teaching is also motivational. It calls us not to neglect this resource, not to treat it as trivial. Just as nations invest in preserving their oil and forests, so too must they nurture their poets and artists. For if the wells of imagination are left untended, the nation may find itself spiritually barren, rich in material wealth but poor in soul. The true greatness of a country lies in its poetry—the power of its voice, the depth of its vision, the ability of its words to endure across time.
The lesson is plain: every citizen is a keeper of this energy. Each poem written, each verse read, each song sung is an act of preservation, a spark added to the collective fire. Do not imagine that only famous poets sustain this power; every schoolchild reciting a verse, every mother whispering a lullaby, every worker singing a song contributes to the inexhaustible reservoir. The nation’s poetry is its people’s poetry, and its energy will endure as long as they speak.
Practical actions follow. Read the poets of your country, old and new, and carry their words as torches. Encourage young voices to write, to sing, to find their rhythm. Support art and education, for these are the wells that keep the energy flowing. And in your own life, turn to poetry not as luxury but as necessity, as vital as bread and water, for it strengthens the soul and links you to the great chorus of humanity.
Thus Richard Eberhart’s words endure as prophecy: “Poetry is a natural energy resource of our country… its power is equal to that of any country in the world.” Let us remember that while material power fades, the spirit’s power is eternal. A nation that keeps its poetry alive will never fall into darkness, for it carries within it a light that no crisis can extinguish, a resource that no age can exhaust.
AVNGOC ANH Vu
This statement makes me reflect on the intangible ways a nation can demonstrate strength. Could the ‘power’ of poetry be measured in creativity, empathy, or cultural cohesion rather than economics or military might? I’m curious if the author believes that nurturing poetry could be as strategically important as cultivating physical resources. How might policymakers or educators treat poetry as a vital asset rather than a luxury, ensuring its potential contributes to the country’s long-term vitality?
TDDang Thi Thuy Duong
I can’t stop thinking about the comparison to energy crises. While physical resources can deplete, poetry is presented as endless, yet does this mean it can sustain societal change indefinitely? Are there historical examples where poetry has directly influenced political or cultural power, making this claim tangible? I also wonder if some countries’ poetry is more influential than others, or if its potency is universally equal, as suggested here.
DANguyen Duy Anh
Reading this, I feel both awe and skepticism. On one hand, imagining poetry as a force that rivals any country’s power is inspiring. On the other hand, I question whether the general population truly recognizes this potential. Does the metaphor risk exaggerating poetry’s impact, or does it highlight a neglected resource in national identity? How can a society harness this creative energy in practical ways, beyond mere admiration or academic study?
GDGold D.dragon
I’m intrigued by the metaphor of poetry as an inexhaustible energy source. Does this imply that poetry has a practical influence on society, or is it purely about moral and intellectual energy? Could there be a point where poetry’s potential is underutilized because society undervalues it? I’m also curious whether this statement reflects a hope for future generations to continue engaging deeply with poetry, ensuring the cultural ‘power’ remains vibrant and relevant.
TANguyen Thi Tam An
This idea fascinates me because it frames poetry as a form of national strength, almost like a renewable resource that sustains culture and identity. I wonder, though, how measurable this power really is—can the influence of poetry on a country’s vitality be quantified, or is it purely symbolic? Could investing more in the arts truly elevate a nation’s standing, or is this more about inspiring a sense of pride and unity among its people?