Poetry is not a matter of feelings, it is a matter of language.
Poetry is not a matter of feelings, it is a matter of language. It is language which creates feelings.
In the words of Umberto Eco, “Poetry is not a matter of feelings, it is a matter of language. It is language which creates feelings.” These words strike with the weight of revelation, overturning the common notion that poetry flows directly from the heart. Eco reminds us that the heart alone cannot sing if the tongue is mute. Feelings may inspire, but they are like raw fire; only language gives them form, direction, and light. Without words, feelings are like thunder that never becomes rain. But through words—measured, chosen, alive—those feelings descend upon the soul of another and awaken them to beauty.
Poetry is not merely the cry of the heart; it is the shaping of that cry into something eternal. A man may feel sorrow, yet only when sorrow is clothed in words does it gain the power to move others. Consider the psalms of David. His grief, his fear, his joy—these were personal feelings. But when set into verse, into rhythm, into living language, they became the songs of nations, prayers for centuries, comfort for multitudes. The psalmist’s greatness was not only in the depth of his feeling, but in his mastery of expression. Thus Eco declares: it is language that creates the bridge, transforming private emotion into universal truth.
Look also to the tale of Homer, the blind bard who gave us the Iliad and the Odyssey. Was it mere feeling that preserved the rage of Achilles or the trials of Odysseus through thousands of years? No—it was the precision of his words, the cadence of his lines, the images he summoned. Without the discipline of language, those passions would have been lost in the winds of time. But shaped into verse, they became immortal, stirring men and women across the ages. Here we see Eco’s wisdom: language creates the feeling anew in every generation, so that the fire burns forever.
This truth speaks also to the power of the tongue in daily life. A lover’s devotion is nothing if it cannot be spoken. A leader’s resolve is powerless unless it finds words that ignite courage. A teacher’s wisdom lies dormant until it is clothed in language that awakens the minds of the young. Feelings alone are private flames, but language makes them torches to light the way for others. The gift of humanity is not that we feel, but that we can share those feelings through words.
The meaning, then, is not to diminish the importance of feelings, but to reveal their dependence upon expression. Feelings are the seed; language is the soil that nurtures, the sun that draws forth growth, the rain that gives life. Without words, feelings die unshared. With words, they live beyond the boundaries of time and self. Thus, to honor our emotions, we must also honor the craft of speaking and writing well.
The lesson for us is clear: if you would touch the hearts of others, master your words. Do not leave your feelings unshaped, for they will vanish like mist. Study the great poets, not only to feel as they felt, but to learn how they forged words into instruments of power. Let your speech be deliberate, your writing thoughtful, your tongue an ally of truth. In this way, you give your inner life a body, and your heart a voice that endures.
Practically, this means cultivating your language each day. Read aloud the works of poets and orators. Practice writing your thoughts until they shine with clarity. Speak not in haste, but with care. For words, once uttered, may pierce or heal, uplift or destroy. Recognize the sacred power entrusted to you: through language, you awaken feeling in another soul. Use that power wisely, and your words will live when you are gone.
Thus Eco’s wisdom is sealed: poetry is not feeling alone, but language that births feeling. The heart may begin the song, but the tongue completes it. And so, O listener, guard your words, cherish them, and wield them with artistry. For in every word you shape, you hold the power to stir hearts, to guide nations, and to touch eternity.
PUPhan Thi Phuong Uyen
Umberto Eco’s quote raises an intriguing point about the role of language in poetry. If language is what creates feelings, does that mean anyone can evoke emotion with the right words, regardless of their personal emotional state? How do poets learn to craft language in such a way that it stirs deep emotions? Does poetry depend more on the art of language than on the poet’s emotional state, or do both elements work together?
THNguyen Trung Hung
Eco’s assertion that language creates feelings in poetry makes me reflect on the relationship between form and emotion. Are some poetic forms more effective than others in creating a certain emotional impact? How does a poet’s manipulation of language—through rhythm, rhyme, and metaphor—affect the reader’s emotional experience? Does poetry lose its power if the language is too simple, or can simplicity itself create profound emotional resonance?
ACAnh Cao
This quote from Eco puts a fascinating spin on the nature of poetry. By emphasizing that poetry is a matter of language, it shifts the focus from personal feelings to the craftsmanship behind the words. Does this mean that a well-written poem can evoke emotion even if the poet doesn’t intend to express strong personal feelings? Can language itself create universal feelings, or is the connection between language and emotion more subjective?
Bbfvievejtbvjoervnwrt
Eco’s view on poetry as a matter of language, rather than just feelings, makes me reconsider how we interpret poetry. If language creates feelings, does this mean that the impact of poetry is more about the structure and choice of words rather than the poet’s emotions themselves? How do we analyze poetry from this angle, focusing on the language and form, rather than simply interpreting the emotions it expresses?
NNnguyen nhu ngoc
I find Eco’s perspective on poetry fascinating. It challenges the common belief that poetry is purely about expressing feelings. Instead, it positions language as the primary tool for creating emotion. Does this mean that poetry is a technical skill more than an emotional outpouring? How can poets balance the technical aspects of language with the emotional depth that readers often seek from poetry?