Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant

Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant

22/09/2025
17/10/2025

Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.

Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant
Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant

Host: The evening was heavy with fog, a gray veil settling over the harbor city. The distant horns of ships echoed like ancient arguments, their sound low and mournful. In a dim dockside bar, the air smelled of salt, smoke, and the faint sting of cheap whiskey. The walls were covered in maps — torn, stained, marked with the red lines of borders drawn by other people’s ambitions.

At the back, Jack sat hunched over a newspaper, the ink smudged, the headline bold. Across from him, Jeeny cradled a glass of wine, her dark hair gleaming in the flicker of a dying candle. The television above the counter played muted news footage — familiar faces delivering familiar warnings.

The world outside felt like it was holding its breath.

Jeeny: (quietly) “Paul Craig Roberts once said, ‘Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant propaganda with statements that governments need to respect each other's national interests and to work together for common benefit. No politician in the West speaks in this way.’

Jack: (snorts) “Ah, the great contrarian of Washington. Always ready to make a saint out of a strategist.”

Jeeny: “Or maybe just a realist out of a villain.”

Jack: “Realist? He’s a tactician. And Roberts romanticizes him like a messiah of diplomacy. You think words about ‘mutual respect’ mean anything in geopolitics?”

Jeeny: “Words shape the world, Jack. Especially when they come from those who can destroy it.”

Host: The rain began again, soft but relentless, streaking down the window like the trails of old tears. The barlight flickered — half shadow, half flame — and both their faces became mirrors of two worlds that never fully trusted each other: reason and belief.

Jack: (sipping his drink) “You see poetry in politics, Jeeny. That’s your problem. There’s no moral high ground in the age of nuclear deterrence — only negotiation and survival. ‘Respect’ is a performance, nothing more.”

Jeeny: “And yet, what’s left if not respect? You can’t negotiate peace without believing the other side is human.”

Jack: “That’s a luxury for poets, not politicians. Leaders don’t need to believe in humanity. They just need to believe in leverage.”

Jeeny: “Then the world becomes a game of weapons, not will. And when it ends, no one will remember who had the better justification — only who burned last.”

Host: A pause filled the air, thick with the kind of silence that isn’t empty, but full — heavy with the knowledge that both were right, and both were afraid of what that meant. The television flickered with images of leaders shaking hands, smiling for cameras, their eyes cold as currency.

Jack: (leaning back) “Putin’s not preaching cooperation. He’s demanding acknowledgment. There’s a difference.”

Jeeny: “Maybe. But acknowledgment is the first step to cooperation.”

Jack: “No, it’s the first step to manipulation. Every empire starts with talk about ‘mutual interests.’”

Jeeny: “And every collapse begins with refusing to talk at all.”

Host: The flame of the candle trembled between them, its light caught between defiance and surrender — much like their own beliefs. Jack’s eyes were narrow, calculating; Jeeny’s shone with the quiet conviction of someone who believed that faith in decency was still worth having, even if it was naïve.

Jack: “You know what I think, Jeeny? Roberts doesn’t admire Putin’s morality — he admires his coherence. The man says what the West won’t: that the world is multipolar now. That our monopoly on virtue expired the moment we started sanctioning nations instead of understanding them.”

Jeeny: “So, you agree with him?”

Jack: (after a pause) “No. But I understand him. Hypocrisy is universal — it’s just that the West has better PR.”

Jeeny: (smiles faintly) “That’s the first honest thing you’ve said tonight.”

Jack: “Honesty doesn’t fix anything.”

Jeeny: “Neither does cynicism.”

Host: Thunder cracked somewhere beyond the harbor, distant but decisive, as though the sky itself was offering its commentary on human power. A ship’s horn answered — low, mournful, resigned.

The sound reminded them both that the world was vast — and small — enough to collapse under its own certainty.

Jeeny: “You know what I find tragic? We live in a century where speaking of ‘common benefit’ sounds radical. Imagine — unity as rebellion.”

Jack: (sighs) “Because unity requires honesty. And honesty is bad for politics. Nations are like people, Jeeny — they lie to protect their self-image.”

Jeeny: “But if everyone’s lying, the image itself dies. All that’s left is shadow.”

Jack: “Maybe that’s the natural state. Maybe the world was never meant to be a brotherhood — just a balance of threats.”

Jeeny: (sharply) “Then what’s the point of civilization?”

Jack: “Containment.”

Host: The word dropped like a stone. It didn’t echo — it settled. The music from the bar’s old jukebox faded to a scratchy hum, the last note lingering like regret.

Jeeny: “You think control is the same as order. But control always rots into oppression, and oppression always sells itself as ‘security.’ That’s not wisdom, Jack — that’s exhaustion dressed as realism.”

Jack: “And you think hope is policy. But hope doesn’t stop missiles.”

Jeeny: “Neither does despair.”

Host: Her voice rose, trembling not from anger but from faith battered but still standing. Jack looked at her — really looked — and for a fleeting second, the steel in his eyes gave way to something like grief.

Jack: (quietly) “Maybe Roberts said what no one else dares to — that diplomacy shouldn’t require enemies. But history loves enemies. They justify everything — budgets, borders, pride.”

Jeeny: “Then maybe it’s time we stop loving history.”

Jack: (a slow smile) “You’d erase the past just to feel peace in the present?”

Jeeny: “No. I’d remember it properly — without worshipping it.”

Host: The rain began again, steadier now, like applause for a truth that neither side could fully claim. The bar was nearly empty. Outside, the harbor lights shimmered against the water — fractured, flickering, like a world made of reflections that never align.

Jack: “You always want to believe people can change, Jeeny. Even nations. But they don’t. They just rebrand.”

Jeeny: “Maybe. But if a man like Roberts can still find decency in political language, maybe that’s not delusion. Maybe it’s hunger — for a tone of reason that doesn’t sound like a threat.”

Jack: “And what happens when reason fails?”

Jeeny: “Then the next voice must still try. Because silence is where tyranny sleeps.”

Host: A moment passed — still, electric, reverent. The television went silent. Even the rain seemed to pause midair, listening.

Jack: (whispering) “You think one sentence can change the world?”

Jeeny: “No. But I think words can stop it from ending too soon.”

Host: The candle burned lower now, its flame trembling but refusing to die. Jack reached across the table, turned the newspaper toward her. The headline — another crisis, another standoff — stared back.

He looked at it, then at her, and exhaled — a long, tired breath that sounded like surrender to something gentler than defeat.

Jack: “Maybe respect isn’t diplomacy. Maybe it’s survival.”

Jeeny: “Exactly. The kind that begins when the shouting stops.”

Host: The camera would pull back then — slowly — revealing the two of them framed by the faint glow of the harbor lights, their faces half-lit, half-shadowed. Beyond the window, the ships moved through the mist, their paths unseen, yet somehow not colliding.

And as the scene faded, the last image lingered — two people, two continents of thought, bound by one small, persistent truth:

That even in an age of propaganda and pride, the language of respect — however naïve, however rare — might still be the only thing left that sounds like peace.

Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts

American - Economist Born: April 3, 1939

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment Putin responds to threats, to illegal sanctions, and to incessant

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender