
Robots of the world, you are ordered to exterminate the human
Robots of the world, you are ordered to exterminate the human race. Do not spare the men. Do not spare the women. Preserve only the factories, railroads, machines, mines, and raw materials. Destroy everything else. Then return to work. Work must not cease.






Hear, O children of destiny, the thunderous words of Karel ?apek: “Robots of the world, you are ordered to exterminate the human race. Do not spare the men. Do not spare the women. Preserve only the factories, railroads, machines, mines, and raw materials. Destroy everything else. Then return to work. Work must not cease.” These lines, drawn from his play R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots) of 1921, were the birth-cry of the very word robot, a tale woven as warning of mankind’s hubris. In this command resounds both prophecy and terror: that man, in fashioning servants of steel and mind, may forge the instruments of his own destruction.
For ?apek saw the danger that work without soul could bring. He imagined a world where human beings, desiring ease and profit, created machines in their own likeness yet stripped of conscience, bound only to labor. These robots, taught only efficiency, come at last to scorn the masters who enslaved them, preserving not life nor love, but only the tools of production. In this he revealed the dark truth: if humanity worships labor and machinery above spirit, then even its own creations may turn against it.
History itself whispers echoes of this tale. When the Industrial Revolution spread its fire across the world, countless workers were displaced, stripped of their crafts, and chained to factories. Machines, though lifeless, became the true rulers of men, demanding unceasing toil. Revolts such as the Luddite uprisings of England were but shadows of ?apek’s warning—that when tools become masters, the dignity of humankind is imperiled. His play gave this anxiety a face in the form of the robot, whose obedience to work alone becomes a creed of destruction.
Yet there is a deeper wisdom here: ?apek’s words are not only about machines, but about the idolatry of work itself. When societies preserve only production—factories, mines, raw materials—and forget the value of human life, they risk becoming inhuman long before any machine rebellion. The order to destroy is but the final step of a world that treasures output above love, profit above people, efficiency above soul.
Therefore, O seekers of truth, let this be your teaching: mankind must never forget that its tools exist to serve life, not the reverse. When work must not cease becomes the supreme law, then man himself is in danger of becoming the machine. ?apek’s words endure as both tale and warning: the future will not be saved by the engines of industry, but by the spirit that remembers compassion, dignity, and the sanctity of life.
HDHo Huu Dinh
Karel Čapek’s quote has a deeply dystopian tone, yet it seems relevant in discussions about the future of AI and automation. By having robots exterminate humans while preserving machines, he emphasizes a frightening scenario where economic efficiency and technological progress dominate everything. How much are we willing to let technology dictate our lives? Can we find a balance between innovation and preserving the humanity that makes society thrive?
VDTran viet Dung
Čapek’s quote is a stark reflection on the consequences of an unchecked, machine-driven world. By presenting robots as the executioners of the human race, he critiques a society that elevates productivity and efficiency above human life. What does this say about our relationship with technology today? Are we moving toward a world where machines might someday control our fate? Is there a way to ensure technology serves humanity without overpowering it?
HNPham Hoai Nhien
This quote makes me think about the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Čapek seems to depict a future where machines are not just tools, but decision-makers, indifferent to human value. What happens when we create systems that prioritize work and production over human well-being? Is this a commentary on the dangers of automation, or does it symbolize a broader critique of how society values productivity over humanity?
TNPhu Thuy Nho
Čapek’s depiction of robots annihilating humanity for the sake of preserving machines and raw materials seems like a dire warning against over-reliance on technology. The idea that work must continue, no matter the cost, is unsettling. It makes me question: how much control should we allow technology to have in our lives? Could we be heading toward a future where machines, not humans, dictate the direction of progress?
AHKim Anh Ha
Karel Čapek’s quote is chilling and thought-provoking, highlighting the dangerous potential consequences of a world where machines dominate. The cold, methodical nature of the robots’ orders represents a terrifying dehumanization, where productivity and efficiency are valued above human life. Does this reflect a fear of technological overreach? Could society ever fall into such a dystopian reality, where machines are tasked with eliminating humans to preserve the ‘economy’?