The scene of independent cinema is already a large scene in

In the grand unfolding of human creativity, there are moments when the world seems to be full of voices, all clamoring for attention. Xavier Dolan, in his reflection on the state of independent cinema, captures the essence of this cluttered landscape when he says, "The scene of independent cinema is already a large scene in America, and not in a negative way, but it's cluttered. It's very populated with just American films, so the room left for foreign movies is not extremely vast. The American public also does not really read. They don't read subtitles. But we're like that in Canada, too." Dolan’s words speak to the inherent challenge that foreign films face in a world dominated by one voice—the powerful, often singular influence of the American cinematic industry. Yet, within his words lies not only a description of the current state of cinema, but a deeper exploration of the nature of culture, identity, and the tensions between the local and the global.

In the ancient world, the city-states of Greece were home to vibrant artistic communities, yet each polis—whether it be Athens, Sparta, or Corinth—sought to elevate its own voice above the rest. Athens, in particular, with its theatrical traditions, was a dominant force in the ancient world of drama. Playwrights like Sophocles and Euripides created masterpieces that would echo for generations, yet their influence was confined largely to the world of Greek-speaking audiences. As much as their works were revolutionary, they existed within the limits of language and cultural norms—not everyone in the world was able to understand, let alone appreciate, the subtleties of these plays. Just as Dolan remarks on the dominance of American films today, so too did the ancient Greeks, despite their greatness, face the limitations of their influence, their language, and their cultural context.

The very nature of storytelling has always been bound by language, culture, and the capacity of the audience to engage. Xavier Dolan points to the fact that while independent cinema has a strong presence, it is still outshined by the global power of American cinema—a juggernaut that dominates the modern artistic landscape. Much like Rome, which spread its influence across the known world, pushing aside many local traditions and voices, Hollywood has become a universal language, absorbing the majority of the global audience. But just as the Romans encountered cultures that resisted their dominance, so too do foreign films fight to carve out a space for themselves, a space that is continually shrinking as the American market continues to expand. In both the ancient world and today, the question arises: How does one maintain the integrity of local artistic expression in the face of overwhelming external influence?

Consider the rise of cinema in Europe, particularly in countries like France, where filmmakers like François Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard revolutionized the art form with the French New Wave. These filmmakers did not seek to imitate the American style of filmmaking, but instead embraced their own cultural identities and experiences. In doing so, they carved a path for foreign cinema that was recognized globally. Yet, as Dolan notes, the room for these voices was always limited, constrained by the overwhelming dominance of Hollywood. Even today, while the French, Italian, and Spanish cinemas have made significant strides, the global audience continues to flock to the familiar allure of American blockbusters. Dolan’s reflection on this issue highlights the delicate balance between preserving the unique voices of cinema and navigating the reality of globalization.

At the heart of Dolan’s observation lies a powerful truth: that art, in all its forms, must continually strive to be heard despite the clutter of competing voices. In the face of overwhelming dominance by one culture, the artist is tasked with finding new ways to connect, to speak, and to remain authentic to their own roots. This struggle is not new. Consider the philosophers of ancient times, such as Diogenes of Sinope, who rejected the materialism of Athenian society and embraced a life of simplicity and self-sufficiency. Diogenes was a man who, despite the vast cultural forces around him, chose to remain true to his vision of truth and individual freedom. Similarly, Dolan’s films, though they exist in a world dominated by American cinema, must still speak with a unique voice—one that challenges and transforms, rather than succumbing to the pressures of the global cinematic monolith.

The lesson here is clear: as artists and creators, we must always remain true to our roots—to the stories we have to tell and the unique perspectives we bring. Just as Dolan strives to preserve the integrity of his foreign films, we must fight to ensure that our own voices are not drowned out by the dominant forces that seek to define us. Art, whether it is cinema, music, or literature, is a reflection of culture, and in the face of overwhelming influence, it is our duty to preserve and celebrate the diversity of human experience. Just as ancient civilizations clung to their identities while embracing outside influences, so too must we navigate the tensions between globalism and localism, between the loudest voices and the quietest, but most essential, truths.

So, as you move forward in your own life, take heed of Dolan's wisdom. Recognize the challenges that come with a crowded marketplace, but do not allow it to stifle your creativity. Whether in your art, your work, or your relationships, stay true to your voice. Like the great artists and philosophers of the past, seek not just to fit in but to stand out, to carve a space where your unique expression can thrive. The world may be cluttered, but in the end, it is those who dare to speak their own truth who shape the future of human culture. Let your voice be one of authenticity, not imitation, and may it resonate far beyond the boundaries of today’s moment.