The trouble with some women is that they get all excited about
The trouble with some women is that they get all excited about nothing - and then marry him.
The words of Cher, singer, actress, and unflinching voice of candor, cut with wit as sharp as a blade: “The trouble with some women is that they get all excited about nothing—and then marry him.” Beneath the laughter of this remark lies a sober truth about love and illusion. She warns that desire, when blinded by haste or shallow charm, can bind women to men unworthy of their devotion. The “nothing” she names is not only emptiness of character, but the absence of strength, honor, or depth.
The ancients, too, sang of this folly. In the tragedies of Euripides, women often gave their hearts to men who could not bear the weight of their love. Medea gave all to Jason, only to be betrayed by his hunger for power. Helen followed Paris, whose beauty masked his weakness, and through her the world was plunged into the fires of Troy. Cher’s jest, like these tales, reveals a pattern as old as time: that passion without discernment can bind a woman’s fate to emptiness.
Her humor also serves as warning and wisdom. It is not marriage itself she mocks, but the surrender of discernment in the face of fleeting attraction. The laughter hides a lesson: that women must guard their hearts, not letting the thrill of admiration disguise the absence of worth. For a union built on “nothing” soon collapses into regret, leaving behind only the shadow of promises never fulfilled.
Consider the life of Anne of Cleves, who was chosen as wife to Henry VIII. The king, excited by her portrait, married her quickly, only to declare disappointment when faced with reality. Though their union was brief, it stands as a lesson in Cher’s wisdom—that passion born of false impressions or shallow measures often leads to empty bonds. To “marry nothing” is not merely a jest, but a tragedy repeated through history.
Let the generations remember: love is not meant to be built on excitement alone, but on the solid ground of truth, respect, and shared strength. Cher, with her humor, teaches that discernment is as vital as passion, and that women, like men, must seek partners of substance, not shadows. Her words, though wrapped in jest, endure as both laughter and counsel: that to marry “nothing” is to bind oneself to emptiness, but to choose wisely is to build a union that endures like stone against the storms of time.
DHTran Thai Duy Hien
Cher’s witty quote makes a good point, but is it a bit too dismissive of women’s emotions? While it may be true that some women—like anyone—can get caught up in excitement, it’s important to recognize that passion and excitement are also what make relationships and love worthwhile. Shouldn’t we be focusing more on how both men and women can grow and learn from their experiences, rather than making light of their emotions?
AKHo Anh Kiet
Cher’s quote uses humor to highlight the tendency to get caught up in excitement, only to later find out it wasn't all it seemed. But shouldn’t we recognize that excitement, even over what might seem like 'nothing,' is often an essential part of falling in love or starting new ventures? Maybe the problem isn’t women’s excitement, but rather how society views and critiques their decisions in relationships.
L9Dat Ly 9a8
This quote from Cher seems to poke fun at the idea that women sometimes get excited about things that end up not being so great. But is that really a fair critique of women, or is it just an exaggeration for comedic effect? It’s possible to argue that anyone—no matter their gender—might rush into something based on excitement, but should we really blame women for their enthusiasm, especially when it comes to love and relationships?
QVQuynh Vu
Cher’s line might strike some as funny, but it seems to tap into a broader societal narrative that women are too emotional or irrational. But doesn’t this dismiss the idea that women, like anyone else, can be careful, thoughtful, and discerning when it comes to relationships? Shouldn’t we be more supportive of women’s choices in love and not so quick to stereotype them based on their excitement or emotions?
MQDoan Minh Quan
While Cher's quote is clearly meant to be humorous, it also raises some interesting questions about relationships. Why is it that women are often seen as getting ‘excited about nothing,’ especially when men might do the same? Does this imply that women are sometimes overly idealistic when it comes to love? Perhaps we should reconsider the tendency to reduce women’s behavior in relationships to just emotional reactions.