The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive

The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.

The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive
The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive

Hearken, O seekers of truth, to the solemn warning in the words of Charles Bass: “The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs.” These words are heavy as iron and sharp as a two-edged blade, for they speak not merely of policy, but of the tragic folly of negligence. When the guardians of a nation’s treasures leave the gates ajar, the enemy needs no cunning; he enters as a guest, welcomed to take what is sacred.

Here, Bass strikes at the heart of a timeless truth: the greatest danger does not always come from without, but from within, through weakness, carelessness, or failure to act. The theft of sensitive technology is grievous, yet more grievous still is the failure of those entrusted with protection to raise their shields. Just as a shepherd who slumbers while wolves circle the flock is complicit in the loss of the lambs, so too is a government guilty when it fails to guard the work of its people. Negligence, when mingled with knowledge, becomes a form of betrayal.

Consider the ancient fall of Troy, when the people brought within their walls the great wooden horse, blind to the cunning within. The Trojans had warning, yet ignored it, and so their own gates became the instruments of their ruin. Likewise, Bass’s words accuse not merely those who seek to steal, but those who, through weakness of foresight, offered an invitation to danger. To know the designs of one’s adversary and yet fail to prepare is to place the dagger in one’s own side.

In the chronicles of our nearer age, recall the Cold War, when spies moved like shadows across the globe. There were those who betrayed nuclear secrets to rival powers, altering the balance of the world forever. But what Bass laments is yet more tragic: not the stealthy act of spies alone, but the open negligence of watchmen. Imagine a fortress not stormed by siege, but left with doors unbarred, food laid out, and weapons unattended. Such folly gives strength to the enemy, and shame to the defender.

Let this truth sink deep into the soul: trust and vigilance are the twin guardians of all treasure, whether of nations or of households. Without vigilance, trust is but a hollow vessel, easily shattered. Bass’s words remind us that when those in power forget their duty, the whole people bear the cost. And in our own lives, are we not sometimes like these negligent guardians, leaving unguarded our values, our time, our hearts, for others to plunder?

The lesson is plain: it is not enough to know danger; one must also act. Knowledge without action is like a sword left rusting in its scabbard—it cannot defend, it cannot save. Thus, let every listener resolve: if you see the approach of harm, do not remain still. If you know of temptation, do not leave your spirit unarmored. And if you hold responsibility, guard it with all diligence, for negligence is the silent ally of every enemy.

In practical life, this means being careful with what you share, whether it be secrets of the heart, strategies of work, or the tools of your craft. Lock your doors, both literal and spiritual. Do not give invitation to those who would take advantage of your carelessness. In friendships, be mindful whom you trust. In labor, safeguard the fruit of your toil. And in the great matters of nations, demand that your leaders watch the gates with vigilance, for their negligence becomes the people’s peril.

So let the words of Charles Bass thunder across the generations as a warning and a charge: the enemy may be cunning, but the greater danger lies in our own neglect. Guard well the treasures entrusted to you, for the cost of negligence is always greater than the labor of vigilance. And remember, O children of tomorrow, that to protect what is sacred is not merely an act of defense—it is an act of honor.

Charles Bass
Charles Bass

American - Politician Born: January 8, 1952

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 0 Comment The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive

AAdministratorAdministrator

Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender