
The untold secret driving the obstruction to Obama's economic
The untold secret driving the obstruction to Obama's economic equality agenda is this: The opposition isn't really battling Big Government. The opposition is protecting an economic system that's putting more and more of the earned income out of reach for those aspiring to better themselves.






“The untold secret driving the obstruction to Obama’s economic equality agenda is this: The opposition isn’t really battling Big Government. The opposition is protecting an economic system that’s putting more and more of the earned income out of reach for those aspiring to better themselves.” — Donna Brazile
In these penetrating and courageous words, Donna Brazile unveils one of the great deceptions of modern politics — that the struggle over government power is often a veil for something far deeper and more enduring: the defense of privilege. She calls this the untold secret, for though nations speak of liberty and freedom, too often their systems are built to favor the few over the many. Her insight cuts through the noise of ideology to reveal the true heart of conflict — not a war against Big Government, but a war to preserve an economic system that quietly widens the gulf between those who have and those who strive.
From the earliest days of civilization, the powerful have cloaked their self-interest in noble language. Kings once said they ruled by divine right; in later ages, merchants spoke of “free trade” while enslaving labor. Each generation creates new words to defend old inequalities. What Brazile exposes is the modern form of this ancient pattern: a society that praises freedom, yet binds opportunity with invisible chains. The obstruction she speaks of — the resistance to reform and equality — is not born of principle, but of fear: fear that justice might undo the comfort of those perched high upon the structures of wealth.
History offers countless mirrors to this truth. Consider the Industrial Age, when workers toiled in smoke and hunger while tycoons amassed fortunes beyond imagination. Reformers such as Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt sought to balance the scales — not to destroy enterprise, but to restore fairness. Yet even then, the cry against “Big Government” echoed through the halls of privilege. The same voices that decried regulation and taxes were often the ones who had benefited most from the absence of restraint. Like in Brazile’s time, they claimed to protect liberty, but in truth, they were guarding their own power.
Barack Obama’s economic equality agenda was, at its heart, an attempt to rekindle an ancient promise — that the rewards of labor should not be hoarded by the few, but shared through opportunity among the many. His reforms sought to lift wages, expand education, and ensure access to health care — the modern foundations of prosperity. But, as Brazile reveals, those who opposed him were not merely contesting policy; they were defending a system that had long tilted the playing field. Their battle was not against government overreach, but against any power that might disrupt the concentration of wealth.
This struggle between privilege and progress is as old as nations themselves. The ancient philosophers warned that when a society’s riches grow too concentrated, its virtues decay. Aristotle, in his study of politics, wrote that extreme inequality is the seed of revolution — that when the few grow too rich and the many too poor, freedom withers. Brazile’s words carry the same warning in a modern voice: when the earned income of honest work becomes unreachable, when effort no longer leads to advancement, the very spirit of democracy begins to die.
Her insight also speaks to the moral dimension of economics. For economics is not merely about numbers or markets — it is about justice, about the fair distribution of opportunity and reward. When the system becomes one in which the ladder of success is pulled up by those who have already climbed it, the social contract breaks. A nation cannot endure if it feeds only the appetites of the wealthy while starving the dreams of the poor. Thus, Brazile’s call is not for envy, but for equilibrium — a restoration of the sacred balance between effort and reward, labor and dignity.
So let this teaching be remembered: equality is not charity, but stability; not weakness, but strength. When governments protect the common good, they do not stifle growth — they secure it. The ancients knew that the prosperity of the city depends upon the well-being of its people, not the luxury of its elites. Let those who lead, therefore, heed Brazile’s wisdom: that progress is not found in protecting systems of greed, but in building structures of fairness. And let every citizen remember — to fight for equality is not to defy the nation’s ideals, but to fulfill them. For the truest measure of freedom is not how much one man can possess, but how much all men and women are free to become.
AAdministratorAdministrator
Welcome, honored guests. Please leave a comment, we will respond soon