Then there is the further question of what is the relationship

Then there is the further question of what is the relationship

22/09/2025
22/09/2025

Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.

Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship

The words of David Bohm—“Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement”—resound like the voice of a philosopher-scientist standing at the crossroads of reason and wonder. They remind us that the human mind is not a still mirror, passively reflecting the world, but a living current that flows, shifts, and transforms in its encounter with existence.

The ancients often pondered the bond between mind and cosmos. Plato spoke of eternal forms, Aristotle of the union of thought and being, Heraclitus of flux and ceaseless change. Bohm, walking in their tradition yet armed with the insights of modern physics, declares that thought is not fixed—it is a movement, a living process that evolves alongside the unfolding of reality. To understand the world, one must recognize this dynamic dance between perceiver and perceived.

This truth is profound: for if thinking is in motion, then reality as we know it is never final, never fully captured. Each idea, each reflection, is but a step in an endless unfolding. The mind does not stand outside the world; it participates in it, shaping and being shaped. Thus, the relationship of thought to reality is not one of static representation, but of living interplay, where each influences the other like partners in a great cosmic rhythm.

To see thought as movement is also to embrace humility. No single doctrine, no fixed certainty, can claim to capture the whole of truth. Just as rivers flow and winds shift, so must our minds remain supple, open, and attentive. The ancients would have called this wisdom: not the clinging to rigid dogma, but the patient openness to the flow of life and the mystery that cannot be contained.

So let this teaching endure: do not imagine that thinking stands apart from reality like a detached observer. Know instead that both are woven together in movement, a ceaseless dance of discovery and transformation. Attend to this flow with care, for in recognizing the living nature of thought, we come nearer to the living truth of the cosmos itself.

David Bohm
David Bohm

American - Scientist December 20, 1917 - October 27, 1992

Same category

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 6 Comment Then there is the further question of what is the relationship

NAKhoi Nguyen Anh

David Bohm’s perspective on thought and reality challenges the conventional notion of thought as a static process. It suggests that our minds are always in motion, constantly shifting. I wonder, though, how this impacts the way we interact with the world. If our thoughts are always evolving, does it mean that our actions are just as fluid and open to change, or are there deeper truths we need to find amidst this constant movement?

Reply.
Information sender

NT11a8-37 Ho Ngoc Tien

Bohm's quote makes me wonder if our thoughts and perceptions of reality are intertwined in ways we don't fully understand. If thought is constantly moving, does it mean that our connection to reality is always in flux too? Can we ever fully understand reality, or are we destined to live in a cycle of constantly adjusting our understanding based on the flow of our thoughts?

Reply.
Information sender

STtruong son tran

The idea that thought itself is in motion brings up some interesting philosophical questions. If our thoughts are not fixed, then how do we know that our understanding of reality is accurate? Does this mean we should constantly question our perceptions, or is there a way to cultivate a deeper, more grounded understanding amidst this ever-shifting process of thought?

Reply.
Information sender

KKTruong Huynh Kha Ky

Bohm’s statement suggests that thinking is not just a passive act but an active, dynamic process. This idea makes me think about how our thoughts influence our actions and, in turn, shape our reality. If thoughts are constantly in motion, how do we manage the noise and uncertainty that come with it? Is it possible to find clarity in a world where our thinking is always fluid and changing?

Reply.
Information sender

TLTran Thanh Lam

Bohm’s reflection on thought’s relationship to reality is intriguing. He suggests that thought is not static, but a continuous process, which leads me to wonder—how does this affect our perception of 'truth'? If our thoughts are always evolving, can we ever reach a final understanding of reality? Or are we always on a journey of reinterpreting it based on new thoughts and experiences?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender