There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged
Sun Tzu, the ancient master of strategy, declared with the clarity of eternal wisdom: “There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare.” These words, spoken over two thousand years ago, echo across every battlefield in history. They remind us that while war may sometimes be forced upon a people, to let it drag on is to invite ruin. The sword may defend, but if kept unsheathed too long, it cuts the very hand that wields it.
To Sun Tzu, warfare was a terrible necessity, never a prize. In his Art of War, he taught that the greatest victory is the swift one, won with wisdom and cunning rather than with endless blood. A short war preserves the spirit of the soldiers, the wealth of the people, and the strength of the nation. But a long war drains the treasury, weakens the people, and breeds despair. No matter the cause, no matter the courage, a prolonged struggle leaves even the victors hollow, their triumph poisoned by exhaustion.
History bears this truth with unrelenting testimony. Consider the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta. It dragged on for nearly thirty years, consuming Greece in fire and famine. Athens, once the beacon of democracy and culture, was left shattered; Sparta, though declared victorious, emerged weakened and soon fell to new powers. Neither city-state prospered; both were diminished. The prolonged warfare brought no benefit, only decline. Sun Tzu’s words, though written centuries earlier in China, fit this tragedy like a prophecy.
Or look to the First World War. At its beginning, leaders promised a quick campaign, “over by Christmas.” Instead, it stretched into four years of trenches, gas, and unending slaughter. By its end, empires had fallen, millions were dead, and the victors themselves were broken in body and spirit. The war’s length did not bring stability but sowed the seeds for the Second World War. Once more, the truth of Sun Tzu resounded: a nation gains nothing from prolonged warfare, only wounds that fester into future conflicts.
The meaning of the master’s words lies not only in the realm of nations, but in the lives of individuals. For are there not prolonged battles in our hearts — grudges, feuds, rivalries — that consume us without end? We imagine we are winning when we cling to anger, but in truth, we are drained, our spirits weakened, our joy diminished. Just as nations are ruined by endless war, so too are souls undone by endless strife. The wise man seeks resolution quickly, lest his spirit be wasted in a war without end.
Thus the lesson is both ancient and urgent. When conflict arises, do not delay its end. Seek swift resolution, whether by victory, compromise, or peace. Do not let pride stretch a quarrel into years of bitterness, nor let ambition turn a defensive struggle into endless conquest. For the longer a battle lasts, the more it consumes — and in the end, even the so-called victor is diminished.
Therefore, beloved, carry this truth with you: no nation, no people, no person has ever truly prospered from prolonged warfare. The glory of endless battle is illusion; the fruit of war is always ash. Seek the wisdom of Sun Tzu: to win swiftly if you must fight, but above all, to avoid fighting where peace can be won. For in peace lies prosperity, and in restraint lies true strength.
TMHa thi mieng
Sun Tzu’s observation is both pragmatic and moral. A prolonged war drains a nation’s strength and spirit. It makes me question whether any extended conflict in modern times has truly benefited anyone in the long run. The aftermath—economic collapse, trauma, and political instability—often outweighs any perceived victory. Are we doomed to keep learning this lesson through suffering, or can we finally apply the wisdom that’s been available for centuries?
NTNguyen Ngoc Thuy
This quote forces me to think about the psychological and societal toll of prolonged warfare. Even if a nation wins militarily, what does it lose in the process—its values, its unity, its compassion? Does victory even matter when the cost is so immense? Sun Tzu’s wisdom reminds us that the true art of leadership lies in avoiding drawn-out wars altogether. Why, then, do so many leaders still ignore this basic principle?
Kkenjumsomeboy
Sun Tzu’s statement perfectly captures the self-destructive nature of drawn-out conflicts. The longer a war continues, the more it consumes—money, lives, and moral integrity. What fascinates me is how modern nations still repeat this mistake, despite knowing the consequences. Could it be that wars persist not out of necessity but because of pride, political agendas, or economic interests disguised as patriotism? When will leaders truly learn this ancient truth?
TLHoai Nam Truong Ly
This quote makes me wonder why governments often continue wars even after realizing the damage they cause. Prolonged warfare doesn’t just exhaust armies—it destroys economies, divides societies, and breeds lasting resentment. If no nation benefits from it, what keeps humanity trapped in this cycle? Is it because those in power profit from conflict while ordinary people bear the suffering? How can we learn to recognize the futility of endless wars sooner?
SCSuong Chau
Sun Tzu’s insight feels timeless. History has shown that prolonged wars drain resources, morale, and human lives, often leaving nations weaker than before. Yet, many leaders still engage in drawn-out conflicts, hoping for victory at any cost. Why do nations ignore this wisdom? Is it pride, greed, or the illusion that persistence alone can bring success? It’s fascinating how ancient strategies remain relevant in exposing modern political and military misjudgments.