There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money

There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money

22/09/2025
25/10/2025

There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.

There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money, either.
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money
There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money

Robert Graves, soldier, poet, and teller of myths, once uttered with both wit and solemnity: “There’s no money in poetry, but then there’s no poetry in money, either.” These words are a paradox, yet a paradox that cuts to the marrow of human life. He speaks to us of the eternal struggle between spirit and coin, between the art that gives meaning and the wealth that sustains survival. In his statement, Graves reminds us that poetry is not born from commerce, nor can wealth ever substitute for the fire of inspiration. The two belong to different kingdoms: one of necessity, the other of transcendence.

The origin of this thought lies in Graves’s own life. He was a man who fought in the First World War, who saw death on the battlefield and then sought refuge in words. His poetry was not crafted for profit but for survival of the soul. Yet he lived in a world where poets starved, where the marketplace prized material gain over spiritual depth. From this tension sprang his reflection. He had tasted both worlds: the harsh demands of money, and the liberating but unprofitable realm of verse. His words are not a complaint but a truth spoken with clarity—that poetry gives life meaning, but rarely bread; and money, though necessary, is barren of beauty when it is hoarded for its own sake.

The ancients knew this same struggle. Consider Socrates, who owned little and sought no wealth, but filled the streets of Athens with questions that burned brighter than gold. By contrast, Croesus of Lydia, famed for his vast treasures, sought to buy security with riches, only to be overthrown, his gold unable to shield him from destiny. The poets, the prophets, and the sages have always stood apart from the merchants, not because money is evil, but because it cannot nourish the deepest hunger of the soul. Graves, in his modern tongue, is but repeating the wisdom of the ages: poetry and money serve different gods.

And yet, do not mistake his meaning. He does not say one must despise money. For bread feeds the body, and without it, no poet can write. But he warns us against confusing value with price. Money may purchase paper, ink, and shelter, but it cannot purchase vision. It cannot call forth the muse or shape words that stir eternity. Just as a field of wheat must be sown and tended by love of the earth, not merely by greed, so too poetry arises from passion, suffering, and wonder, not from the promise of coin.

Consider the story of Vincent van Gogh. He sold almost nothing in his lifetime, living in poverty and despair, yet his art now speaks across centuries, priceless in its impact. Van Gogh found no money in poetry, no wealth in painting, but his vision of swirling skies and burning fields lives on as a gift to humanity. By contrast, countless wealthy men of his age, though rich beyond measure, left behind no beauty, no lasting song, no trace in the soul of the world. In their fortunes, indeed, there was no poetry.

The lesson is thus: pursue wealth only as a servant, never as a master. Let money be the tool by which life is sustained, but let poetry—the pursuit of beauty, truth, and meaning—be the master of your heart. For if you live only for money, your days will be filled but your spirit empty. But if you live for poetry, whether through words, deeds, or the simple act of seeing the world with wonder, your life will be rich beyond gold.

Practical action follows. Cultivate a craft not because it brings wealth, but because it brings life. Create something—write, paint, sing, teach, or serve—that nourishes others, even if it never fills your purse. And when you earn money, spend it in ways that serve poetry: on books, on experiences that lift the soul, on acts of generosity that make life more beautiful. In this way, wealth and art are not enemies, but allies, each in their rightful place.

So let Graves’s words echo in your heart: “There’s no money in poetry, but then there’s no poetry in money, either.” Do not seek to measure your worth by coin, nor your life by ledger. Instead, let your wealth be the poetry of your deeds, and let your poetry be the treasure you leave behind. For when the dust of time covers the golden coins, it is the poem, not the purse, that endures.

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment There's no money in poetry, but then there's no poetry in money

Mminhthu6a13

I find Graves’ view of poetry both bittersweet and true. It speaks to the sacrifices artists often make when choosing passion over profit. But does that mean that poets and other artists should always embrace poverty as part of their journey? Is it possible to have financial success and still remain true to the essence of your art, or is there a line that, once crossed, risks corrupting the creative process?

Reply.
Information sender

TTrinh

This quote makes me reflect on the broader role of art in society. While it’s true that many poets struggle financially, doesn’t poetry have a priceless impact on culture, even if it’s not directly tied to money? Can we say, then, that the true value of poetry lies in its influence on emotions, ideas, and society—things that can’t be measured by financial worth? What does this say about the value of art in our economy?

Reply.
Information sender

NTNghia Trong

Graves seems to be expressing a paradox—poetry might be financially unrewarding, but there’s also no room for the pursuit of wealth within poetry itself. I wonder, though, if this is still true today. With the rise of platforms that allow writers to monetize their work, could poetry find a way to bring together art and commerce without compromising its integrity? Or is the essence of poetry really at odds with financial success?

Reply.
Information sender

TTBui Le Thanh Truc

I can’t help but wonder if Graves is suggesting that poetry transcends materialism or that it’s simply not suited for it. If poetry has no financial rewards, but also no place for money within it, does that imply that art and commerce are fundamentally incompatible? What does this mean for modern poets who are trying to make a living while remaining true to their craft? Can art and money coexist in the current world?

Reply.
Information sender

VVy

Graves' quote seems to highlight the tension between artistic pursuits and the practical realities of life. On one hand, it’s true that poetry often doesn’t provide financial security, but on the other, isn’t there something incredibly valuable in the act of creating art for art’s sake? Does this mean that poetry, or art in general, isn’t meant to be commodified? Should we accept that creativity and monetary success often don’t go hand in hand?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender