War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in

War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in

22/09/2025
19/10/2025

War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.

War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in
War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in

The French sage Anatole France, with eyes sharpened by the sorrows of his age, gave forth a saying as hard as steel and yet as gentle as the dove: War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in violence and shall be ready to suffer every persecution that their abstention will bring them. It is the only way to abolish war.” In these words lies a teaching that demands courage greater than the battlefield, for it is the courage not to strike back, to bear injustice without vengeance, and to answer hatred with steadfast refusal to destroy.

France lived in a Europe still trembling from the echoes of bloody conflict, and his words are born from the memory of fields soaked with the blood of nations. He looked upon humanity and saw that each war was but the child of the war before, a chain of vengeance and pride stretching back through centuries. To break the chain, he said, men must do the unthinkable: renounce violence utterly, and bear with patience the scourge that such renunciation would bring. For the world does not smile upon those who refuse to fight; it mocks them, imprisons them, even slays them. Yet it is only through such sacrifice that the cycle can end.

Think of Mahatma Gandhi, who centuries after Anatole France gave life to this very teaching. When the mighty empire of Britain held India in its grasp, Gandhi called not for guns, but for peaceful defiance. He and his followers endured imprisonment, beatings, even death, but they would not raise the sword. The salt march, the boycotts, the silent protests—all were acts of nonviolent resistance. And though the struggle was long, it bore fruit: the chains of empire were broken without the sword of retribution. This is the living proof of France’s vision, the triumph of endurance over bloodshed.

Yet such a path is not easy. The armies of the world scorn the unarmed man, and even his neighbors may call him coward. To abstain from violence when the world clamors for battle is to walk alone upon a narrow path. But the ancients knew that the strongest warrior is not he who conquers cities, but he who conquers himself. To master the fury within and to stand unyielding before persecution—that is a victory greater than any battlefield could yield.

France’s teaching is not the way of nations intoxicated with power, nor of rulers who glory in conquest. It is the way of the few who see beyond their own age into the heart of eternity. It calls us to ask: what if the multitudes laid down their arms, and no man would march to the sound of the trumpet? The engines of war, however mighty, would lie useless, for they are but shells without the hands of men to wield them. The true battlefield, then, is not in the fields of Europe or the deserts of Asia, but in the soul of each man, where he must decide whether to take part in the machinery of destruction.

For us who live in quieter times, the lesson remains. We may not face the call of conscription, but each day we are tempted to answer insult with insult, injury with injury, hate with hate. The spirit of war begins in small acts of vengeance, in the refusal to forgive, in the eagerness to strike back. To walk the path of France’s vision is to choose another way: to meet cruelty with steadfast patience, to endure wrong without multiplying it, and to labor always for peace.

Therefore, let the teaching be written upon your hearts: if war is to vanish, it must begin with you. Be ready to endure loss rather than inflict it, to bear suffering rather than cause it. Train your soul in patience, restrain your hand in anger, and remember always that every blow withheld is a step toward peace. Though the world may persecute, mock, or despise you, you will stand as a light to the generations that follow. For the day will come when war is no more, and it will be because some, in faith and courage, chose to suffer rather than destroy.

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment War will disappear only when men shall take no part whatever in

THTan Hung

Is it even possible to envision a society where war no longer exists? While France’s words are certainly profound, they seem to ignore the human tendency to retaliate in the face of aggression. Would it really be possible for individuals to bear the weight of persecution without falling back into violence, or does this ideal ultimately place an impossible burden on those who would prefer peace over conflict?

Reply.
Information sender

QAVuong Quoc Anh

The idea that war can only disappear if men are ready to endure persecution in its absence challenges me to reconsider the human condition. How many people would actually be willing to suffer, perhaps losing everything, in the name of peace? How does that compare to the justifications many people make for war? What does true peace look like, and how do we balance the ideals of no violence with the realities of human nature?

Reply.
Information sender

HTMinh Hieu Tran

France’s perspective is deeply philosophical, yet I find myself questioning whether it’s fair or even realistic to expect such a drastic change in human behavior. Can humanity genuinely give up all forms of violence, especially in the face of potential threats? Is this idealistic or an attempt to urge people toward non-violent means of resolving conflict, even when pushed to the edge? It raises some important ethical questions about the nature of peace.

Reply.
Information sender

ALAnh Le

I wonder if Anatole France's suggestion is practical in the modern world. Is it possible for humanity to abandon all forms of violence? What about self-defense or protecting others? Can peace truly exist without the willingness to resist when necessary? His vision of suffering as a price for peace seems noble, but is it fair to ask for such sacrifice from individuals who may be forced into violent situations by circumstances beyond their control?

Reply.
Information sender

NTNguyen Thuy

This quote makes me think about how unrealistic it might seem for humans to completely abstain from violence. While the idea of complete peace sounds beautiful, is it truly achievable in a world where survival instincts and territorial disputes are so deeply embedded in our nature? Would we even be able to handle the persecution that might come with such abstention, or would it lead to further suffering and conflict?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender