We... our war began September the 3rd 1939, with the invasion of
We... our war began September the 3rd 1939, with the invasion of Poland by Germany, and thereafter the great state of danger in England at that time, with the bombings, necessitated the evacuation of children.
Hear now the solemn remembrance of Peter Shaffer, who spoke of a time when the earth itself trembled beneath the march of armies: “We... our war began September the 3rd 1939, with the invasion of Poland by Germany, and thereafter the great state of danger in England at that time, with the bombings, necessitated the evacuation of children.” These words echo not as cold history, but as living memory, the cry of a generation thrust into the furnace of World War II. They remind us that war does not wound only soldiers upon the battlefield—it tears also at the hearts of the innocent, scattering the laughter of children into the winds of fear.
The invasion of Poland on that fateful September day was the spark that set the world ablaze. From it arose alliances and declarations, and the drums of war rolled across Europe. For England, the shadow of danger loomed quickly, as bombs soon rained upon cities, tearing open the skies and shattering the peace of homes. The enemy’s purpose was not only to destroy armies, but to break the spirit of a people, to sow terror in the very hearth of families. Thus, the war entered not only the fields of battle, but also the cradles of children.
It was then that Britain undertook one of the most sorrowful and heroic acts of the age: the evacuation of children from cities into the countryside. Mothers wept as they placed their sons and daughters upon trains, not knowing if or when they would see them again. The sound of steam and wheels was mingled with cries and farewells, for love demanded separation to preserve life. The government called it Operation Pied Piper, yet to those who lived it, it was no fairytale—only the harsh wisdom that children must be kept safe, even if it meant breaking the family’s embrace.
Consider the story of one such child, a boy named William, who was sent from London to a small village in Devon. At first he wept each night, longing for his mother’s arms and the familiar streets of home. Yet in time, he came to know the kindness of strangers, to find refuge in the green hills, and to grow strong despite his sorrow. His mother, meanwhile, endured the bombing of the Blitz, clinging to hope with every letter that reached her hands. Their tale, repeated thousands of times, shows both the cruelty of war and the resilience of love.
The meaning of Shaffer’s words is thus: that war does not merely clash steel against steel, but rends the bonds of family and forces upon the young a burden they should never have to bear. The evacuation of children is both a testament to the dangers of that era and to the fierce determination of a people to preserve the next generation, even at the cost of their own hearts’ comfort. In this we see that true courage is not only found on the battlefield, but also in the quiet sacrifices of parents and children who endure separation for the sake of survival.
The lesson is clear and eternal: when danger rises, it is not enough to defend walls and borders—one must safeguard the innocent, the vulnerable, the future itself. To neglect them is to lose the very purpose of defense. And in our own day, though bombs may not fall from the skies above, there are storms of poverty, injustice, and despair that threaten children still. To protect them, to nurture them, is as vital now as it was then.
Therefore, let us act with vigilance and compassion. Let us create homes, schools, and communities where children need not flee, where they may laugh without fear, and where their growth is guarded as the most sacred treasure. Let every act of policy, every decision of power, ask first: how does this serve the young? For the truest victory in any age is not the conquest of enemies, but the survival and flourishing of children. Thus Shaffer’s memory becomes our charge, and his sorrow becomes our warning: guard the little ones, for in them the future of the world is carried.
DLTran the Duc lam
This quote captures the start of something catastrophic through the eyes of an ordinary citizen, not a historian. That makes it even more powerful. I find myself wondering how collective memory of such events differs between those who lived through it and those who only read about it. Can empathy ever bridge that distance between history and lived reality?
GDGold D.dragon
It’s sobering to think about the level of fear that could drive an entire nation to send its children away. The evacuation symbolizes both the best and worst of humanity — love strong enough to protect, and a world dangerous enough to demand such choices. How would modern societies respond if faced with a similar threat today?
CCChip Chio
What strikes me here is how calmly Shaffer recalls a moment of pure chaos. Maybe that’s how trauma is processed — turned into a matter-of-fact memory. But I can’t help asking, how did people maintain normalcy in such uncertainty? Did they believe the war would end soon, or was it simply human instinct to endure and hope for safety?
THLe Thi Thu Hong
The evacuation of children during the bombings reveals a haunting side of war we often overlook. It wasn’t just about strategy or politics — it was about survival and heartbreak. I wonder how those who were evacuated coped with the sense of displacement. Did they feel grateful, or did it leave a lifelong scar of abandonment and loss?
LHKim 3A Le Hoang
Peter Shaffer’s recollection paints such a vivid image of vulnerability — not soldiers on the battlefield, but children on trains heading to the countryside. It’s a reminder that wars don’t just reshape nations; they reshape childhoods. I’d be curious to know how that experience of forced separation influenced his later work as a playwright, especially his fascination with human conflict and emotion.