We want peace and development in all 10 states of South Sudan -
We want peace and development in all 10 states of South Sudan - we don't want military backing.
“We want peace and development in all 10 states of South Sudan – we don’t want military backing.” Thus spoke Ger Duany, actor, activist, and one-time child of war, whose life itself is a testimony of struggle and survival. In his words resounds the voice of a people who have known too much suffering, too much displacement, too much hunger, and yet still dare to dream of peace. His declaration is not only a cry for his homeland, but also a lesson for all humanity: that true progress is not born of guns, but of development; not of soldiers, but of schools and farms; not of military power, but of dignity restored.
The meaning of this saying lies in the choice between two futures. On one hand stands the path of military backing, a road South Sudan has walked for decades—rebellion, civil war, massacres, endless cycles of blood. On the other hand lies the road of peace and development, where resources are spent not on weapons, but on hospitals, roads, and education. Ger Duany’s wisdom is to remind us that the strength of a nation does not lie in the size of its army, but in the well-being of its people. Peace is the soil in which every harvest grows; without it, no development can take root.
The ancients taught the same lesson. The prophet Isaiah once cried, “They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks.” He spoke to a world obsessed with war, reminding it that only when weapons are transformed into tools of creation can nations flourish. Ger Duany’s words echo this ancient prophecy: South Sudan, and indeed all nations, must turn from the fire of war toward the light of building and renewal.
History, too, bears witness. After the devastation of World War II, Europe lay in ruins. Its cities bombed, its people starving, its faith broken. Yet instead of clinging to military solutions, leaders chose development—the Marshall Plan, the rebuilding of industry, the creation of shared institutions. Within a generation, enemies became allies, and Europe rose from ashes to prosperity. What was possible for Europe is possible for South Sudan: the transformation of swords into plowshares, of warriors into builders.
Yet Duany’s words come from a place of deep experience. As one of the “Lost Boys of Sudan,” he fled violence as a child, walked hundreds of miles, survived refugee camps, and carried with him the scars of war. He knows what military backing truly means: not stability, but more orphans; not safety, but endless trauma. His voice carries the authority of suffering, but also the authority of hope. For he returned not to wage war, but to call for healing, for education, for development in all the 10 states of his fragile homeland.
The lesson for us is not limited to South Sudan. In every nation, in every community, there is the same temptation: to trust in force instead of reconciliation, to choose the quick answer of arms instead of the patient labor of peace. But Duany reminds us that the lasting victory is not to dominate an enemy, but to create a society where children may grow without fear, where families may flourish, where opportunity replaces despair. Development is the true fortress of a people; peace is its strongest shield.
Therefore, children of tomorrow, remember Ger Duany’s wisdom: refuse the false promise of war. Let your leaders know that guns cannot feed the hungry, that soldiers cannot build roads, that armies cannot heal the wounded heart of a nation. Choose instead the harder path—the path of peace, of rebuilding, of development. For though this path is long, it is the only one that leads to lasting freedom. And when all 10 states of South Sudan, and all nations of the earth, commit themselves to this path, then humanity will finally dwell in the security it has long sought—not by the sword, but by the plow.
KLDo Khanh Ly
Ger Duany’s statement strikes me as a hopeful and aspirational vision, but I wonder if the reality of South Sudan’s situation allows for peace to be achieved without any form of military support. Can the government and international organizations truly focus on development when security concerns still loom large? How do you ensure the safety of civilians and aid workers while focusing on peacebuilding and development?
DTNhu Nguyen Duong Tam
This quote reflects a yearning for peace through development rather than force, which I find very compelling. But considering the geopolitical realities of South Sudan, how feasible is it to avoid military involvement in the peace process? Can development be prioritized if the country is still grappling with internal conflict? What steps need to be taken to ensure that peace can be achieved through peaceful methods rather than military intervention?
NHNguyen Hien
Ger Duany’s message is clear in its desire for peace and development, but it raises a question: how do you achieve peace without military backing in a country with such a complex history of conflict? Is it possible to create lasting stability through non-military means? How much does external assistance, whether through financial aid or peacekeeping forces, play a role in fostering peace in fragile states like South Sudan?
PHBui Gia Phuc Hoai
I admire the vision of peace and development in South Sudan without relying on military support. It’s refreshing to hear a focus on long-term solutions rather than short-term security measures. But can peace really be achieved without some level of external involvement, especially in such a volatile region? What role should the international community play in supporting peace efforts without resorting to military intervention?
CTNGUYEN cHIM tO
Ger Duany's statement about wanting peace and development without military backing is powerful. It speaks to a desire for sovereignty and the belief that true peace comes from development and diplomacy, not force. But how realistic is it to expect peace in South Sudan without some form of security support? Can development truly flourish without a stable environment? How do you balance peace efforts with the need for protection during turbulent times?