We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the

We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the

22/09/2025
25/10/2025

We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.

We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the
We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the

Howard Dean, physician, governor, and voice of populist challenge in the early years of the twenty-first century, once thundered these words: “We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the budget. You can't trust right-wing Republicans with your money. You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget. I'm much more conservative with money than George Bush is.” In this fiery declaration, he drew upon the eternal tension between promise and responsibility, between the rhetoric of governance and the hard truth of fiscal stewardship. His words were not simply partisan jabs; they were a warning about trust—that sacred currency more precious than gold in public life.

The ancients too recognized this principle. For what was the downfall of empires if not the corruption of their treasuries? In Rome, the grandeur of conquest was undone not by foreign swords alone but by extravagance, deficit, and mismanagement of public wealth. The citizen might endure war or famine, but when rulers squandered the common purse, trust was shattered and rebellion brewed. Dean’s words echo this ancient wisdom: those who lead must first prove themselves faithful keepers of the people’s resources, for money is not mere coin but the lifeblood of a nation’s stability.

History gives us vivid examples. In the United States, the great struggle of the 1990s centered around fiscal discipline. Bill Clinton, often underestimated, presided over years of budget surpluses after decades of mounting debt. By contrast, the years before and after were marked by deficits and unchecked spending, often justified by ideology but burdening the future. Dean, as governor of Vermont, claimed the mantle of one who had walked this path: balancing budgets, making painful decisions, and proving himself as a steward. Thus, when he declared himself more conservative with money than George Bush, he sought not only to boast, but to claim the moral ground of fiscal responsibility.

Yet there is also in his words a deeper lesson about trust and money that transcends party. For money is not merely numbers in ledgers—it is promise, accountability, the assurance that leaders will not spend recklessly what belongs to all. To fail to balance a budget is not only to fail in arithmetic but to fail in faithfulness. It is to tell the people, your labor, your taxes, your sacrifices—these are not enough; we must borrow from your children also. Dean’s anger, then, was not only political—it was prophetic, a cry that leaders must be judged not by their words but by their stewardship.

There is something heroic in this challenge. For it is easier for a leader to promise everything and pay nothing, to hand out gifts with borrowed coin and to hope the reckoning falls on another’s watch. It is harder—yet nobler—to cut, to discipline, to say no when no is needed. In every age, the true conservator is not the one who shouts about thrift, but the one who quietly ensures the books are balanced, the roof does not leak, and the people’s treasure is not squandered. Dean’s words, sharp though they were, call us to honor this ancient form of leadership: stewardship over spectacle.

So what lesson shall we carry from this, children of tomorrow? It is this: do not be deceived by words alone, whether shouted from podiums or whispered in campaigns. Look instead at the record: who has kept trust with the people’s wealth? Who has shown discipline in the use of resources? For promises may glitter, but the true measure of a leader is whether he has proven himself faithful with the common purse. Trust, once broken, is hard to regain; demand from your leaders not grand speeches, but honest accounts.

Practical wisdom flows. In your own life, be conservative with what is entrusted to you, whether it is money, time, or responsibility. Balance your accounts, not only in ledgers but in relationships—do not borrow endlessly from tomorrow what you cannot repay today. And when you judge leaders, judge them by their fruits, not their slogans. In this way, you honor the wisdom of the ancients and the warning of Howard Dean alike.

Thus his words endure: “You ought to hire somebody who has balanced a budget.” This is more than campaign rhetoric; it is timeless teaching. For stewardship of resources is the mark of integrity, and only those who prove themselves faithful in little can be trusted with much.

Howard Dean
Howard Dean

American - Politician Born: November 17, 1948

Tocpics Related
Notable authors
Have 5 Comment We've not had one Republican president in 34 years balance the

QTquynh trang

Dean's claim about being more conservative with money than George Bush is intriguing, but it also leaves me wondering about what specific policies he’s referring to. Does being ‘more conservative’ in financial matters mean cutting spending drastically, or does it mean investing in different priorities? How do we decide which politician is most trustworthy with finances—based on their record, or on their promises during election cycles?

Reply.
Information sender

KANguyen Thi Kim Anh

Howard Dean’s criticism of Republican presidents and their track record on balancing the budget is pointed, but it also makes me question how much of the blame lies with the president versus the broader political system. Are presidents really in control of the national budget, or are they often constrained by Congress and other factors? Can any single politician be truly ‘conservative’ with money, or does government spending always have compromises?

Reply.
Information sender

HCHelen Chiquitosen

This quote feels like a challenge to the traditional idea that right-wing Republicans are inherently better with money. If they haven’t balanced the budget in 34 years, does that mean their fiscal policies are inherently flawed, or is it just the complexity of the economy that prevents it? Should we rethink our approach to budgeting in the government, regardless of political party, or does the party affiliation really matter?

Reply.
Information sender

TMTran Thuc Mi

Dean’s remark about being ‘more conservative with money than George Bush’ seems like a strong critique of Bush’s policies, but it raises a bigger question about how ‘conservative’ we expect our leaders to be with finances. Is being conservative with money the same as being effective with it? And can a politician’s stance on budget management really define their entire approach to governance, or is it just one piece of the puzzle?

Reply.
Information sender

QTNinh Van Quoc Trung

Howard Dean’s statement brings up an interesting point about fiscal responsibility and political trust. If no Republican president has balanced the budget in 34 years, does this imply a fundamental flaw in their approach to governance? Or could it be that balancing a budget is more complex than political affiliation? It makes me wonder—should we trust politicians based solely on their party or on their specific fiscal track record?

Reply.
Information sender
Leave the question
Click here to rate
Information sender