
We've switched from a culture that was interested in
We've switched from a culture that was interested in manufacturing, economics, politics - trying to play a serious part in the world - to a culture that's really entertainment-based.






The words of Stephen King lament a great turning of the ages: a shift from a culture rooted in manufacturing, economics, and politics, toward one consumed by entertainment. Once, nations measured their strength by the goods they forged, the ideas they debated, and the role they played in the affairs of the world. Now, he warns, we measure our strength by the spectacles that amuse us, by the flickering images on a screen, by the idols of fleeting fame. This transformation is not merely a change of interest—it is a change of spirit, a redirection of the soul of a people.
For in the past, to labor in factories, to study the science of trade, or to wrestle with politics was to take part in the building of civilization itself. Such efforts demanded seriousness, sacrifice, and vision. But in the present age, King observes, attention bends toward the theater of distraction. The laughter of sitcoms, the roar of stadiums, and the endless scroll of entertainment begin to drown out the deeper voices of duty and responsibility. The people, hungering for diversion, forget that nations cannot stand upon amusement alone.
History warns us of such decline. The glory of Rome was not lost in battle alone, but also in the decay of its seriousness. Once a republic of farmers, soldiers, and statesmen, Rome became a city of games and spectacles. The emperors, knowing the people’s hunger, gave them bread and circuses, until the citizens cared more for the outcome of a chariot race than for the fate of the empire. So too does King’s warning echo across time: a culture that forgets its foundations will one day find them crumbling.
Yet his words are not without hope. For just as cultures can descend into distraction, they can also awaken. The fire of seriousness need not be lost—it can be rekindled. Every generation is offered a choice: to seek only amusement, or to once more take up the harder tasks of economics, politics, and creation. Entertainment need not be the enemy, but when it becomes the master, the deeper pillars of society are left unattended, and the roof of civilization begins to sag.
So let this be remembered: amusement is sweet, but it is not sustenance. A people that wishes to endure must return again and again to the fields of labor, the halls of learning, and the councils of governance. For without these, no culture can remain strong. King’s words, spoken in our time, echo the ancient truth: a society that lives only to be entertained may glitter for a moment, but it will not stand the test of ages.
TLNguyen Thi Thuy Linh
King’s comment about the change in cultural priorities brings up an important issue—are we really focused on the things that matter, like politics and economics, or are we just filling our time with entertainment? Can we still be engaged with the world while also enjoying entertainment, or has this focus on media left us apathetic toward the real work that needs to be done? How can we shift the culture back to valuing meaningful contributions while still appreciating the role of entertainment?
草青草 青
Stephen King’s point about our society’s shift from seriousness to entertainment culture strikes a chord, especially when you think about how much time people spend on social media or consuming content. Is this an inevitable evolution of technology and culture, or have we actively chosen to focus on entertainment at the expense of things that matter? Are we losing something important by valuing entertainment over critical issues like politics and economics?
TMLe Nguyen Thuy Minh
I agree with Stephen King’s observation about the shift towards an entertainment-based culture, but I wonder if this is entirely negative. Is entertainment simply a reflection of our desires, or does it actively shape the way we engage with the world? Can we say that entertainment itself doesn’t have value, or should we just aim to balance it with a deeper focus on serious global issues? How do we find that balance in a world so saturated with media?
HNHung Nong
Stephen King’s comment about the cultural shift towards entertainment makes me wonder: what are the long-term effects of this change on society? Have we become a culture that’s distracted by spectacle and sensationalism, rather than being actively engaged in the world’s pressing issues? Can we still balance our need for entertainment with the responsibility to play a serious role in politics, economics, and manufacturing, or is the focus on entertainment eroding our ability to do so?
NTNguyen Dac Nhan Tam
King’s perspective on how we’ve moved from a culture of serious engagement to one obsessed with entertainment is really thought-provoking. Does this mean that our societal values have shifted in a way that undermines progress in critical areas? Are we so absorbed by entertainment that we forget the importance of contributing to things like economics, politics, and manufacturing? What happens when entertainment becomes the focal point of our culture instead of the work that drives innovation and change?